false 0 6 false false Mon Aug 11 04:33:35 -0700 2008 Sat Sep 06 14:04:50 -0700 2008 A last question remains: In the name of what can this fundamental language be regarded as a delirium? Granting that it is the truth of madness, what makes it true madness and the originating form of insanity? Why should it be in this discourse, whose forms we have seen to be so faithful to the rules of reason, that we find all those signs which will most manifestly declare the very absence of reason?

A central question, but one to which the classical age has not formulated a direct answer. We must approach it obliquely....

Er -- must we, though? Really, Mickey? Must we really approach it that way?

Dude, this guy's got some interesting stuff to say, for sure, but I'm not a girl renowned for my patience or fortitude, nor for my grasp of oblique philosophy. And let's face it, Mike, la vie est trop courte! Je suis très désolée, mais.... je ne peux pas. I mean, I could, but come on.... wouldn't that be just a little bit, um, well.... crazy?

What I mean by all this is: Oh, Foucault, what the hell are you ever talking about.... Beats me!]]>