Steph Sinclair's Reviews > Grave Mercy

Grave Mercy by R.L. LaFevers

by
4642710
Actual rating 2.5 stars

Grave Mercy started out very strong for me with its historical roots. I instantly loved Ismae and could empathize with her bleak outlook on life. The novel had strong characters, a good plot, and political intrigue. I mean, c'mon! An assassin nun?! A badass premise like that is just begging to be read and loved. So what in heaven's name went wrong for me? Why am I only giving this book 2.5 stars?

Well, I'll start with what I actually liked first. I did like all the characters, especially Ismae. It's a big deal for me to like the heroine since I usually hate them due to their inability to use their brains. But not Ismae, she's a smart cookie. This isn't shocking since I'd wager it does require a certain amount of neurons to assassinate someone. And while she does carry prejudices against men due to her harsh childhood, there is a good amount of character growth for her. So, gold star for her. Duval, the love interest, while initially not appealing to my co-blogger, won me over fairly easily. And for all those wondering, the "His" in "His Fair Assassin" is not referring to Duval. It refers to Ismae's god, Mortain. At least, I'm pretty sure. Lol.

I also really liked the plot and the historic features. I can tell LaFevers did lot of research and it truly does show. Many of the characters in the novel are real people and the events occurring, real events. I felt it was a nice change in pace to the usual YA books I've read.

But the good points just weren't enough for me to love this book. Unfortunately, the negatives outweigh the positives. *sigh* Another book falls short of badassery.

First of all, I probably would never have picked up this book on my own if Kennedy hadn't suggested a read-a-long. I choose to avoid historic fiction for a myriad of reasons, the most important being: It's just not my cup of tea. When I have to sit down and think about the setting, time period, a huge cast of characters I have to keep up with, political talk, yada, yada, yada... it just turns me right off. It's too much. And I don't like having to concentrate while reading for enjoyment. In this case, I liked it, but then, I didn't like it. For the first portion of the novel, I was unsure of *when* in history this book took place. Personally, I cannot sit back and enjoy a novel if it feels like I'm missing a crucial part of the story. And the time period was important for me. European history is just not my forte, so I took to Wikipedia looking for answers. Unfortunately for me, I now knew how the story would eventually end unless Levers decided to deviate from history. But at least I knew the time period is the late 1480s. Yay for me. Boo that I had to work so hard to find the answer.

Anyway, that was the first strike. The second? Boredom. Right around 40% the high from the strong beginning began to fade and along with it, my eyelids closed more often then I'd like them too. Ismae is a trained killer, but there wasn't much killing going on. In fact, there was mostly too much talking about the political plans being made to ward of the French from invasion. Honestly, I couldn't care less about any of that. I WANTED BLOOD. Then it got boring. Ismae spent more time talking about all her cool weapons, than using them. She'd go on and on about her poisons and how she could kill someone with this weapon or that poison. I wanted her to take a page from Nike.

Photobucket Pictures, Images and Photos
No excuses, Ismae!

*FRUSTRATION* What good is an assassin nun that just wanders the castle?! Do something! Anything. Do the Macarena. Sing a Ke$ha song!

Photobucket Pictures, Images and Photos

But, I was still interested enough to continue on and I'm glad I did, because it started getting interesting. However, that leads me to my forth point...

This book was entirely too predictable. Could the bad guy be anymore obvious? LaFevers pretty much dangled him in front of us the entire novel like a carrot, so by the time the main characters goes, "It was you!" you're thinking, "It's about time." And that really made me sad because I thought, "There was no way it can be who I think it is. It's just too easy. There has to be one last plot twist." Sadly, there wasn't one and because of that, I think the ending suffered greatly.

Speaking of the ending, it felt incredibly rushed to me. All conflicts came to a more or less, hurried happy ending. As soon as the baddie is caught the book has nothing more to do then fall back on its underdeveloped romance between Ismae and Duval. That's not to say I disliked Duval and Ismae. I actually liked both characters a great deal, but together? Not so much. Grave Mercy spent entirely too much time revolving around the mystery and not much time developing the relationship. I think the book needed to make its mind up: Romance or plot. It couldn't have both believably, in this case.

*mild spoilers* But the part I really disliked about the book was the scene where Ismae had to purge poison from Duval's body by having sex with him. I was relatively enjoying the book up until that point. When I read that scene I rolled my eyes so hard. I mean, really?! REALLY?! She is a nun assassin and the biggest gift Mortain gives her involves her sexuality? She becomes a human bezoar! Would ya look at that? A woman's body really can be objectified in almost any profession! Awesome. \(-_-)/

The next book appears to be about Sybella, who I thought would have had a bigger role in this installment. The mystery surrounding the girl was thrown at the reader several times and we are given no information about her assignment. Same goes for Annith's story. I found that incredibly frustrating. I realize this is supposed to be a series and perhaps their stories will be told in the sequels, but leaving those gaps made Grave Mercy seem incomplete. I can't help to think the book would have been stronger as a stand alone novel instead of stretching their stories out over three books.

So, will I continue on with this series? At this time, probably not. But I would still recommend it to others looking for a change-up in their usual YA readings, especially those who enjoy historic fiction with romance and a pleasant splash of paranormal.

More reviews and other fantastically awesome things at Cuddlebuggery Book Blog

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Grave Mercy.
sign in »

Quotes Steph Liked

R.L. LaFevers
“When one consorts with assassins, one must expect to dance along the edge of a knife once or twice.”
R.L. LaFevers, Grave Mercy

R.L. LaFevers
“I stare at him coldly. "I do not care for needlework." I pause. "Unless it involves the base of the skull.”
R.L. LaFevers, Grave Mercy


Reading Progress

03/24/2012
26.0% 5 comments
03/25/2012
28.0% "Whoa. I didn't see that one coming." 2 comments
03/27/2012
47.0% "Interesting! I'm enjoying this so far, but my co-blogger? Not so much. http://cuddlebuggery.com/2012/03/read..."
04/01/2012
54.0% "I'm getting a little bored right now, but I'm hoping it will pick back up soon. Read-a-long part 2: http://cuddlebuggery.com/2012/04/grav..." 1 comment

Comments (showing 1-50 of 51) (51 new)


Experiment BL626 Awesome. I hope you like this.


Steph Sinclair Experiment BL626 wrote: "Awesome. I hope you like this."

Really? Well, now I'm really interested. I hope I love it too!


Sierra The premise sounds quite interesting! (Also I just love female assassins :P)
I hope this book is good :)


rameau Premise was interesting but the execution just wasn't for me. I'm morbidly curious what others think.


message 5: by Mika (new)

Mika Koga i cant wait for your review on this one :)


message 6: by Lyndz (new) - added it

Lyndz I will keep an eye out for your review on this one, I think it looks like it has some promise.


Steph Sinclair I just started today, but I'm enjoying the writing style so far.


Sandra Does your copy have the same issues with capitalizing names and the first word of a sentence? Mine does and it's driving me BONKERS!!


Steph Sinclair Sandra wrote: "Does your copy have the same issues with capitalizing names and the first word of a sentence? Mine does and it's driving me BONKERS!!"

Omg! Yes! I thought it was just me! I just want to break out my red pen! Lol.


message 10: by Blythe (new) - added it

Blythe How are you liking this?


Steph Sinclair Blythe wrote: "How are you liking this?"

I'm liking it a lot right now. I love the voice of the MC.


message 12: by Blythe (new) - added it

Blythe Good to know, thanks. I've heard great things about it, and then not so great things.


Steph Sinclair Blythe wrote: "Good to know, thanks. I've heard great things about it, and then not so great things."

I know, people seem to either really live it or hate it. I wonder where I will fall? Lol.


message 14: by [deleted user] (new)

I'm about to start this myself. It sounds fairly bad ass so hopefully um...it is.


Steph Sinclair Janice wrote: "I'm about to start this myself. It sounds fairly bad ass so hopefully um...it is."

I really like it so far!


☆Jessie☆  (Ageless Pages Reviews) I seem to be the odd one out with my love for the ending. That's cool. I'm not totally intimidated, or anything I'm glad it was at least a 3-star read for you.


message 17: by Elena (last edited Apr 05, 2012 08:15am) (new) - added it

Elena The ending was a disappointment for me too! My reaction was, "that's it?"


message 18: by [deleted user] (last edited Apr 02, 2012 02:49pm) (new)

I was hoping this would be good! :( Can't wait for your review. :P At least it's 3 stars...


rameau Now I definitely want to see this review.


Steph Sinclair Should be up in a day. Kat and I are planning a special joint review for the blog. :)


message 21: by Aphrodite (new)

Aphrodite Wow nd I wanted to get it


Steph Sinclair Aphrodite wrote: "Wow nd I wanted to get it"

A lot of people really like it! I'd still go ahead and get it if I were you. :)


message 23: by Aphrodite (new)

Aphrodite ya lol hahaha:)


rameau You say the relationship was underdeveloped, whereas I thought the book was nothing but that relationship. Everything––plot, mystery, assassiny, characterisations––was sacrificed at the altar of that "romance." Oh, well, I couldn't get to the 40% mark, but I'm still morbidly curious what others thought of it.


message 25: by Steph (last edited Apr 05, 2012 10:36am) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Steph Sinclair rameau wrote: "You say the relationship was underdeveloped, whereas I thought the book was nothing but that relationship. Everything––plot, mystery, assassiny, characterisations––was sacrificed at the altar of th..."

It was there, flailing in the wind. I think Kat said it best when she mentioned how she could see they had mutual respect, but an actual "Zomg, I wuv youuuuu!" wasn't working. This book was trying to be a YA historic romance and Historic Fiction at the same time and because of that it lacked in both areas. I wish it would have been just one or the other.


message 26: by Jillian -always aspiring- (last edited Apr 05, 2012 10:44am) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Jillian -always aspiring- Stephanie wrote: "But the part I really disliked about the book was the scene where Ismae had to purge poison from Duval's body by having sex with him. I was relatively enjoying the book up until that point. When I read that scene I rolled my eyes so hard. I mean, really?! REALLY?! She is a nun assassin and the biggest gift Mortain gives her involves her sexuality? She becomes a human bezoar! Would ya look at that? A woman's body really can be objectified in almost any profession! Awesome. \(-_-)/"

You, Stephanie, are awesome for making this analogy, and I was thinking something similar myself when this resolution came up.


Megan (Book Brats) I agree with you about Sybella. I liked this book more than you did, but Sybella was just a random throwaway character there to serve as a convenient plot point and object of discussion, nothing more.


rameau Stephanie wrote: "rameau wrote: "You say the relationship was underdeveloped, whereas I thought the book was nothing but that relationship. Everything––plot, mystery, assassiny, characterisations––was sacrificed at ..."

The historical aspects didn't bother me--and it's been years since I studied anything older than the Second World War in school--neither did the politics. I was actually looking forward to reading those, but the plot failed me, utterly.

I think Marg's review said something about all the wasted possibilities of the Catholic school aspect (haven't read Kat's yet), but I couldn't understand why the five chapters were there at all. Apart from Ismae's marriage scene and introduction to the nunnery, all that schooling was superficial information and could have been buried as details in the actual plot of assassiny and political intrigue. I think the fact that it wasn't turned me against this book pretty quick. Now those five chapters make more sense if the author is planning on creating separate books for the two other girl-assassins, but I still think their character introductions could have been handled better. Make them somehow essential to the plot and not to the vague learning period (I wanted names for the poisons and more than one scene with anonymous seeds).

That's the part that's so aggravating to me. The plot premise promises a lot, but it's all handled in such a superficial way. The author might have spent a great deal of time researching the historical facts, but those should have remained as garnish, something to add depth to the story she wanted to tell.

If I understood correctly, LaFevers has written for younger children before and this is her YA debut. To me, it looks like she's underestimated her audience, because I've come to expect more from YA authors and the actual young adult audience certainly deserves more than this book is giving them.

(Sorry about the epic.)


Steph Sinclair @Jillian, thanks. I was surprised at that scene. It was a huge "wait a minute" moment for me. I didn't understand why the poison had to be purged via sex. If she's going to be a bezoar, why can't it just be through skin contact? Or why can't she have sex with him just because she *wanted* to instead of it needing a life threatening reason? *sigh*

@Megan, I was looking forward to finding out about Sybella. She was wasted potential.


Steph Sinclair rameau wrote: "Stephanie wrote: "rameau wrote: "You say the relationship was underdeveloped, whereas I thought the book was nothing but that relationship. Everything––plot, mystery, assassiny, characterisations––..."

Yes, yes, yes. I completely agree. I was initially drawn to these chapters, but they start to seem out of place as you get further into the book. And BIG yes to the other girls. I would have liked to have seen more from them. LaFevers made them seem essential to the plot and I kept waiting for something from them. Then the book ended. -_-


Alexa I generally liked the book (though I had the same problem with the draggy first part), but I didn't know what to think about about the whole sexual healing thing. On the one hand, I was pleased that the romance actually went somewhere (I found all the tension and ogling really irritating and cumbersome to the rest of the plot), and that Ismae seemed confident in her sexuality. To me it was clear that if she had liked Duval even a smidgen less, she wouldn't have gone through with it, which is a good sign. However, like you said, human bezoar. That's pretty icky.


Kelly *ooooh! gurl....* Sexual healing? Really? I've not seen that since I read some LKH stuff. I have this on my TBR pile, but I might move it down a bit and read some other stuff first.


Giselle Did they actually have sex? I thought she just lay on him nakes. Which I thought was kind of bizarre. Sex makes much more sense but it's still... wrong. Eww. Wasn't he like, unconscious? Anyways. I was bored of the politics for the most part too. Glad I'm not the only black sheep >.<


message 34: by Steph (last edited Apr 05, 2012 09:56pm) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Steph Sinclair @Alexa, the sexual healing came out of nowhere for me. I was not expecting that at all!

@Kelly, yes! It was a little strange, but it doesn't seem to bother other readers at all. So you never know!

@Giselle, I had to read that part twice and I still am not 100% sure. Right before she laid on top of him she mentioned that she wasn't entirely sure of what happens when a woman lies with a man. I took that to mean she was planning on sex. Then she took her clothes off. All the while, I'm thinking how does he have the strength for that activity?! Then they slept there?? So, I don't know. Your guess is as good as mine. Lol.


Nafiza I actually started off quite unimpressed but then I ended up really liking it. Heh.


Lauren I actually enjoyed this book and for whatever reason wasn't bored by it, but you definitely make some really good points that I can't argue with. Especially the sexual healing thing. WTH? lol Does not compute. I did not understand how she went from meeting the god of death to suddenly understanding she needed to ride her man to save him. I mean who would WANT to have sex with a man on his death bed? It just does not hold up to scrutiny. If LaFevers had applied that kind of thinking when she was deciding who the villain was going to be, I'm sure I would have been taken totally by surprise. Great review!


Stephanie **spoiler comment**

wait, does she actually have sex with him? i thought she just cuddled :P


Steph Sinclair Lauren wrote: "I actually enjoyed this book and for whatever reason wasn't bored by it, but you definitely make some really good points that I can't argue with. Especially the sexual healing thing. WTH? lol Does ..."

Thanks! I completely agree with you, of course!

Stephanie wrote: "**spoiler comment**

wait, does she actually have sex with him? i thought she just cuddled :P"


They ended up naked. Unless they were just cuddling naked? It's not very clear.


Amanda The Book Slayer This one disappointed me quite a bit. I was really hoping for more. *shrugs shoulders* I am not sure if I will read the next book or not.


Stephanie yeah, that's what I thought. naked cuddling. I don't think anything sexual actually had to happen.


Steph Sinclair Stephanie wrote: "yeah, that's what I thought. naked cuddling. I don't think anything sexual actually had to happen."

Maybe that is what happened. It's still a really odd scene and I don't like how her sexuality was used.

Amanda wrote: "This one disappointed me quite a bit. I was really hoping for more. *shrugs shoulders* I am not sure if I will read the next book or not."

Yeah, it's not a high priority for me. Maybe I will depending on other reviews.


message 42: by Pricky (new)

Pricky Wow. Great Review. Historical Fiction isn't my cup of tea either so I'm glad I read this before trying to delve into the madness. Although I am curious now about purging the poison part while naked. Sounds very odd...


Oksana  *Bookaholic* Wow... I love your reviews!


Steph Sinclair Thank you!


Dione Sage I was wondering about this book. I saw it again on Libboo Grave Mercy glad I saw your review


Oksana  *Bookaholic* Yeah, it's really good to be able to read a honest review :)


Steph Sinclair Glad you found it helpful. :)


Sarah Marie I wanted a bloodbath too. I also thought the sex part with Duval was really bad. If you're going to have sex in YA at least make it interesting. I found this book to be incredibly boring. All my expectations were killed by page 60.


message 49: by Dee (new) - rated it 3 stars

Dee Great review! I totally agree with you. At first, it was really good and then it became horribly boring and predictable. I wanted more action scenes as well, but all Ismae did was talk halfway through the end :(


Steph Sinclair Dannah wrote: "Great review! I totally agree with you. At first, it was really good and then it became horribly boring and predictable. I wanted more action scenes as well, but all Ismae did was talk halfway thro..."

Thanks! Are you going to read the second one?


« previous 1
back to top