David Fleming's Reviews > Love Me
Love Me
by Danger Slater (Goodreads Author)
by Danger Slater (Goodreads Author)
To be perfectly honest I usually stick to the classics or books that are at least twenty or so years old. But, secretly, I've been looking for a book that honestly reflected more modern sentiments. I wasn't let down with "Love Me!"
There are a lot of clever little things going on in this novel so I'll name a few that most impressed me: the false histories (mismatched technology and references throughout create a unique and fun world), the modern pop-culture allusions, the alliterative prose style and the Freudian type symbolism. Freudian type symbolism? Yes. Look: He's lonely. He lives in a really tall tower (phallic symbol) and he talks to the Moon (the symbol for woman). And there are a bunch of things like that going on in the text. It's like another novel going on simultaneously.
This novel did have it's difficult moments for me at times. Danger_Slater's sense of play is so carefree and experimental that, at times, I did lose track of what was happening and have to reread a sentence or two. But is that really such a fault? Shouldn't novels be novel and strain our ability to comprehend a bit? At times the protagonist was a bit too powerful for my liking. The hero did struggle in this story but for my liking he could have sweated his obstacles more.
I would describe the over-arching theme of this work as "the malaise of modern life." That might sound like a downer but it's handled with plenty of humor.
If you enjoy irreverent, satirical modern stories like those of Kurt Vonnegut there's a very good chance you'll enjoy "Love Me."
There are a lot of clever little things going on in this novel so I'll name a few that most impressed me: the false histories (mismatched technology and references throughout create a unique and fun world), the modern pop-culture allusions, the alliterative prose style and the Freudian type symbolism. Freudian type symbolism? Yes. Look: He's lonely. He lives in a really tall tower (phallic symbol) and he talks to the Moon (the symbol for woman). And there are a bunch of things like that going on in the text. It's like another novel going on simultaneously.
This novel did have it's difficult moments for me at times. Danger_Slater's sense of play is so carefree and experimental that, at times, I did lose track of what was happening and have to reread a sentence or two. But is that really such a fault? Shouldn't novels be novel and strain our ability to comprehend a bit? At times the protagonist was a bit too powerful for my liking. The hero did struggle in this story but for my liking he could have sweated his obstacles more.
I would describe the over-arching theme of this work as "the malaise of modern life." That might sound like a downer but it's handled with plenty of humor.
If you enjoy irreverent, satirical modern stories like those of Kurt Vonnegut there's a very good chance you'll enjoy "Love Me."
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Love Me.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 07/10/2012 | page 130 |
|
77.0% | "I had to take a break from Tender is the Night. Sorry, F. Scott Fitzgerald. I'm enjoying the originality of this novel." |
| 07/10/2012 | page 80 |
|
48.0% | "I'm enjoying the originality of this book!" |
| 07/18/2012 | page 150 |
|
89.0% | "I've been laughing out loud! (Because it's actually funny... to me anyways.)" |
Comments (showing 1-4 of 4) (4 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Shovelmonkey1
(new)
Jul 26, 2012 01:21pm
Nice review, I downloaded this but am yet to read it. Further up the priority pile it goes!
reply
|
flag
*
I've been a very lazy reviewer of late. Need to reinstall some self discipline. I have to admit, I think the Hunger Games Trilogy ate my brain.
Shovelmonkey1 wrote: "I've been a very lazy reviewer of late. Need to reinstall some self discipline. I have to admit, I think the Hunger Games Trilogy ate my brain."I honestly wish I made more of a point to read more of the popular books (brain eating or not) but I just haven't been able to find the time. Maybe you'd suggest against this, however.
