☆Jessie☆ (Ageless Pages Reviews)'s Reviews > Afterwards
Afterwards
by Rosamund Lupton (Goodreads Author)
by Rosamund Lupton (Goodreads Author)
☆Jessie☆ (Ageless Pages Reviews)'s review
bookshelves: general-and-literary-fiction, arc, contemporary-fiction, netgalley-arc, mystery, emotional-whiplash, 2012-reads, 2012-reviews, reviewed, curious-and-curiouser
Apr 26, 12
bookshelves: general-and-literary-fiction, arc, contemporary-fiction, netgalley-arc, mystery, emotional-whiplash, 2012-reads, 2012-reviews, reviewed, curious-and-curiouser
Read on April 21, 2012
Read This Review And More Like It On My Blog!
3.25 out of 5
Afterwards was a lot of things for me: frustrating, alienating, weird, intriguing, and eventually, quite moving. There's a lot of hype built around this newish author, largely due to the wild success and continued love for her first novel, Sister. With that in mind, I went into this sophomore effort with high hopes that were never quite met. There's a lot of potential in this novel about mothers and daughters, love, and independence but it never quiiiite reaches the heights it could. I want to clarify my 3.25 out of 5 up there - it's the result ofknee-jerk reactions deep thinking. The first 300 pages were a solid, disappointing 2 out of 5 stars. An awkward and jarring style (second person POV, told with the present tense), a somewhat overly perfect main character, and a truly irritating overemphasis on italics on nearly every page (and I am an italics, bold and strikethrough addict) mar an intriguing and thoroughly gripping mystery. The final 100 pages of twists, turns, "Oh my god!" and "No way!"s do much to alleviate the various, now-previous problems I'd had and also made me happy I hadn't given up early on this one.
The second person POV rarely, rarely works for me as a reader. In fact the only time I have actually appreciated it as a storytelling medium were for the rare interludes during The Night Circus which used it sparingly. Here, with Grace narrating everyone's actions to/at them ("You do this, say this, want this" etc.), it's very cumbersome and unwieldy to read as a non-involved observer. By the time I grew inured to the strange and uncomfortable style used throughout Afterwards (and it took a while, trust me), I could start to appreciate the subtlety of the mystery that Lupton has created. It's both layered and nuanced in its inception and execution - truly the strongest element to the novel is the whodunit. This is not one of those thrillers where the culprit or culprits is/are transparent from the beginning - several cleverly manipulated red herrings lead the police investigation, and my theories, jumping from character to character. I have to applaud such deft narrative sleight-of-hand - I was curious from the start. Even when I was close enough to giving up, the question at the heart of Jenny's problems wouldn't let go of my imagination.
I wish I could appreciate the spectral-astral plane-ghost-spirit-whatever the main characters have going on. The fact that what's going on with the two main characters isn't really explained in depth was another misfire for me - it came off as gimmicky and rather calculated. Another disconnect was with the main character and narrator, the mother, Grac(i)e. She, her husband, her daughter and son were all too perfect to be entirely believable. And as the novel went on and revelation led to revelation, it becomes apparent that Grace doesn't really know anyone outside her family at all. (view spoiler) Her love for her children was certainly compelling and believable, but her harsh judgement of sister-in-law Sarah further spoke to Grace's own shortcomings and didn't inspire any likeability. Sympathy is entirely another matter, because as a "spirit-whatever", her interactions with Jen do allow Grace a bit of growth and personal evolutioneven though it takes forever.
The story at the heart (heh) of Afterwards is definitely a good one - the mystery well crafted and thought out, but the style really does take a large adjustment. I'm obviously of two minds about this because there's much to love and a lot to lament. There are intense moments of brilliance book-ended by the awkward style and gimmicky status of the main character, but for all its faults, I ended up mostly enjoying Afterwards. It gave me emotional whiplash and I'll keep my eye out for what else this author does in the future.
3.25 out of 5
Afterwards was a lot of things for me: frustrating, alienating, weird, intriguing, and eventually, quite moving. There's a lot of hype built around this newish author, largely due to the wild success and continued love for her first novel, Sister. With that in mind, I went into this sophomore effort with high hopes that were never quite met. There's a lot of potential in this novel about mothers and daughters, love, and independence but it never quiiiite reaches the heights it could. I want to clarify my 3.25 out of 5 up there - it's the result of
The second person POV rarely, rarely works for me as a reader. In fact the only time I have actually appreciated it as a storytelling medium were for the rare interludes during The Night Circus which used it sparingly. Here, with Grace narrating everyone's actions to/at them ("You do this, say this, want this" etc.), it's very cumbersome and unwieldy to read as a non-involved observer. By the time I grew inured to the strange and uncomfortable style used throughout Afterwards (and it took a while, trust me), I could start to appreciate the subtlety of the mystery that Lupton has created. It's both layered and nuanced in its inception and execution - truly the strongest element to the novel is the whodunit. This is not one of those thrillers where the culprit or culprits is/are transparent from the beginning - several cleverly manipulated red herrings lead the police investigation, and my theories, jumping from character to character. I have to applaud such deft narrative sleight-of-hand - I was curious from the start. Even when I was close enough to giving up, the question at the heart of Jenny's problems wouldn't let go of my imagination.
I wish I could appreciate the spectral-astral plane-ghost-spirit-whatever the main characters have going on. The fact that what's going on with the two main characters isn't really explained in depth was another misfire for me - it came off as gimmicky and rather calculated. Another disconnect was with the main character and narrator, the mother, Grac(i)e. She, her husband, her daughter and son were all too perfect to be entirely believable. And as the novel went on and revelation led to revelation, it becomes apparent that Grace doesn't really know anyone outside her family at all. (view spoiler) Her love for her children was certainly compelling and believable, but her harsh judgement of sister-in-law Sarah further spoke to Grace's own shortcomings and didn't inspire any likeability. Sympathy is entirely another matter, because as a "spirit-whatever", her interactions with Jen do allow Grace a bit of growth and personal evolution
The story at the heart (heh) of Afterwards is definitely a good one - the mystery well crafted and thought out, but the style really does take a large adjustment. I'm obviously of two minds about this because there's much to love and a lot to lament. There are intense moments of brilliance book-ended by the awkward style and gimmicky status of the main character, but for all its faults, I ended up mostly enjoying Afterwards. It gave me emotional whiplash and I'll keep my eye out for what else this author does in the future.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Afterwards.
sign in »
Quotes ☆Jessie☆ (Ageless Pages Reviews) Liked
“I'm a sliver-thin light, diamond sharp, that can slip through gaps in the world we know. I will come into your dreams and speak soft words when you think of me. There is no happy ever after - but there is an afterwards.
This isn't our ending.”
― Rosamund Lupton, Afterwards
This isn't our ending.”
― Rosamund Lupton, Afterwards
Reading Progress
| 04/21/2012 | page 24 |
|
6.0% | "How is Gracie so sure that her daughter is on the third floor?" |
| 04/21/2012 | page 39 |
|
10.0% | "This is just so weird - the present tense, 2nd person POV and the main characters are ghosts or spirits? Uhhh. Ok." |
| 04/21/2012 | page 118 |
|
30.0% |
"Lady, I've |
| 04/21/2012 | page 303 |
|
76.0% | "My ARC copy only has 383 pages, so I might as well finish this one, right? Once more into the breach..." |
| 04/21/2012 | page 362 |
|
91.0% | "I absolutely love that I didn't call the antagonist(s). Nice narrative sleight of hand, Ms. Lupton - redeemed some points, I must admit." 7 comments |
Comments (showing 1-14 of 14) (14 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Blythe
(new)
-
added it
Apr 21, 2012 06:57pm
I was going to start this one soon. Luckily, I haven't had the highest hopes for it. I've heard her other book, Sister, is much better.
reply
|
flag
*
I almost DNF'd this 40 pages in, kept complaining as I read, swore I would never read Sister about halfway through... and then ended up liking the damn thing. If you like a well-plotted mystery, I think you'd enjoy this. If you hate 2nd person POV, you'll loathe it.Reviews for Sister do seem to be better - I'll probably pick it up based on the strength of the last quarter of this.
Well, I'm torn. I love a well plotted mystery, but not a fan of 2nd person POV. I'll give it a shot either way, though, thanks!
Well, if it makes you feel better I've rationalized my rating down from a 3.75 to a 3.25. Thinking on it and writing the actual review yesterday made me realize the mystery/reveal doesn't completely make up for the many other problems.I'll be verrrry interested to see your review for it.
Completely, totally understandable. If I didn't have a highly curious nature that wants to know what everyone is doing and why, I probably would've as well.
Also, I suspect I know who did it and that lessened the need for me to finish. And I'm kind of a hater these days! I'm surprised this one didn't work as I so love the supernatural woo-woo (as I say in my review) but...yeah. :/
If you want to guess I will tell you if you were right or not. I was completely off-base with my theories which amounts for a large portion of the rating I gave it. Heh "supernatural woo woo" - I also thought the spirit/angel element was not the best choice.
Half-way through this book, while deciding whether to keep going, I ran across your review and it is spot on! The characters are stock, the pov is odd, cumbersome and sometimes hard to follow - I read some lines over and over to make sense of them. Like many books I read now, it should have been edited down. However, after reading your review, I will keep going to get to those final twists and payoffs! Sisters was a much better book.
