Nilesh Kashyap's Reviews > The Pearl
The Pearl
by John Steinbeck
by John Steinbeck
It was a big mistake I made 3 days ago, I was going to start 'Charlotte's Web' but instead I started 'The Pearl' thinking it was written before ‘Of Mice and Men’ and on just finishing I found it was written much later. All I remember is my decision to read books in sequence they were published. Anyway it can’t be undone.
The Review:
This small prologue tells very much of all that is in the book. From the very first page, the moment the pearl is found and on every other page one knows that pearl will be lost. But I read with the bleakest of hope that the pearl would not be lost, the pearl that has became Kino’s life and whose music, the music of pearl, played above all. Or did I read just to confirm for myself that pearl was really lost, lost to the world that comprised of pearl dealers (with hope that someone will replace the one, under whom they worked), doctor (who dreamed of going to Paris), Priest (remembering those part of church that were in need of repair) and to the city of concrete.
What’s interesting is the vivid description of landscape. You just do not read a story but you live the story. You see and feel everything, even that which is not perceptible to our eyes in day to day life. I remember only one book that had stark description of setting and backdrop even more vibrant ‘The Inheritance of Loss’
There is nothing much to remember from the story, nevertheless a nice story. It just feels that I am yet to read the best of John Steinbeck.
The Review:
“In the town they tell the story of the great pearl” how it was found and how it was lost again. They tell of Kino, the fisherman, and of his wife, Juana, and of the baby, Coyotito. And because the story has been told so often, it has taken root in every man’s mind. And, as with all retold tales that are in people’s hearts, there are only good and bad things and black and white things and good and evil things and no in-between anywhere.“If this story is a parable, perhaps everyone takes his own meaning from it and reads his own life into it. In any case, they say in the town that…”
This small prologue tells very much of all that is in the book. From the very first page, the moment the pearl is found and on every other page one knows that pearl will be lost. But I read with the bleakest of hope that the pearl would not be lost, the pearl that has became Kino’s life and whose music, the music of pearl, played above all. Or did I read just to confirm for myself that pearl was really lost, lost to the world that comprised of pearl dealers (with hope that someone will replace the one, under whom they worked), doctor (who dreamed of going to Paris), Priest (remembering those part of church that were in need of repair) and to the city of concrete.
And in midst of all this we see a stubborn husband’s struggle to save his family from all the evil that came along with the pearl. A calm wife and at the same time a mother, making futile attempt to get rid of pearl as it has laid curse upon her family.
What’s interesting is the vivid description of landscape. You just do not read a story but you live the story. You see and feel everything, even that which is not perceptible to our eyes in day to day life. I remember only one book that had stark description of setting and backdrop even more vibrant ‘The Inheritance of Loss’
There is nothing much to remember from the story, nevertheless a nice story. It just feels that I am yet to read the best of John Steinbeck.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Pearl.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 03/12/2012 | page 27 |
|
30.0% |
Comments (showing 1-13 of 13) (13 new)
date
newest »
newest »
Megha wrote: ""All I remember is my decision to read books in sequence they were published."Do you follow this rule for all authors?"
Yes, I try to follow this rule pretty much (for classics must) but for all authors, i'm not sure.
Good review. At least you have the best of Steinbeck to look forward to. His shorts, like this one, are fun, but don't have the real power of some of his novels. I'm glad you liked the landscape descriptions, that is what really sold me on Steinbeck. Just wait until East of Eden. Your jaw will drop.
s.penkevich wrote: "Good review. At least you have the best of Steinbeck to look forward to. His shorts, like this one, are fun, but don't have the real power of some of his novels. I'm glad you liked the landscape de..."Thanks S.! East of Eden will be last or second last book i will read of Steinbeck, what is next on my list is Of Mice and Men.
And you might want to give a try to The Inheritance of Loss
Thank you for the recommendation, that sounds rather good. Plus I need to get on reading more Man Booker Prize winners.Of Mice and Men is quite good, but heads up, it's a bit of a downer. We read it in school and I remember being 13 years old and trying not to tear up reading it under my desk.
s.penkevich wrote: "Thank you for the recommendation, that sounds rather good. Plus I need to get on reading more Man Booker Prize winners.Of Mice and Men is quite good, but heads up, it's a bit of a downer. We re..."
At 13? I doubt at that age one can get to the very essence of the book.
I didn't really. I mostly caught on that there were whore houses and that the ending was sad. I now grade high school english papers on the side and re-read a few years back it to grade the freshman essays on it and realized that they too missed the point. However, I really learned a lot from it, especially seeing it from a teaching standpoint, and it sparked my love of Steinbeck.
s.penkevich wrote: "I didn't really. I mostly caught on that there were whore houses and that the ending was sad. I now grade high school english papers on the side and re-read a few years back it to grade the freshma..."when you have a choosen a new perspective, it just gives whole new meaning to everything
I think that in high school I also read things I wasn't quite mature enough to understand fully. There were also some books that just left me a little traumatized, e.g. The Pearl, The Pigman and Lord of the Flies.
Richard wrote: "I think that in high school I also read things I wasn't quite mature enough to understand fully. There were also some books that just left me a little traumatized, e.g. The Pearl, [book:The Pigman|..."A lot of people end up developing hatred toward very good books just because they have been force fed with it during their school days
You are right about that, I think. A lot of classic novels have fairly low ratings here on Goodreads, perhaps because many of their readers had to read them in school at some stage.
Reading a book and hating it is still better than not being introduced to reading novels at all. That is what pisses me off about Indian education system; they make no effort towards develop reading habits among children.

Do you follow this rule for all authors?