Hannah Taylor's Reviews > Pure

Pure by Andrew Miller
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4511759
's review
Feb 23, 12

Read from February 17 to 22, 2012

I purchased this book on a whim; I rarely purchase reading material without scrupulously comparing prices online, and making sure that yes, I definitely do want to read this book. However, when in Waterstones, one can rarely resist buying something - is it something in the paper-filled air? I can't be the only one, and as wonderful as Amazon is, 'Look Inside!' feature takes all the romance out of smelling and caressing a brand new book.

Anyway, this contemporary read is set in 18th Century pre-revolution France. As someone who never reads 'modern' books, this was a bit of a risk, and one that I cannot say paid off. The book seemed to lack plot, perhaps because it was based around the excavation of Les Innocents cemetery in France, where the bones of the dead were taken to the Catacombs in which they now reside. The lack of one single event means that the plot too seems like one large progression rather than a story, and seems to lead to nowhere in particular. The writing is eloquent enough - although I disliked the overuse of words like 'piss' and several references to vulgar bodily functions and habits that served no purpose within the novel - but the lack of real purpose in the story is definitely a disadvantage. The characters are somewhat insipid, not at all helped by the present tense, third person narration, which further adds to the sense of detachment from anything recognisable. The reactions of particular characters were absurd and unrealistic, with actions having no discernable motives or consequences in terms of emotions - a little more time developing the characters, a little less time trying to shock the reader with voyeuristic descriptions might have improved my reception of the book.

The descriptions of 'Gripping' and 'Dazzling' seems out of place after the novel is finished, as it instead read like an extract from an observation of life among sociopaths, with no plot to grip with, and limp characters that failed to dazzle. I may read another book by Andrew Miller, as his writing was experimental and unique, but in this structureless, obscure, very foreign format, the lack of any familiar technique is more than disconcerting, not very successful, and rather ruined my enjoyment.

I might stick to Amazon until I have a better nose for good books elsewhere.
2 likes · likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Pure.
sign in »

Reading Progress

02/18/2012 page 71
20.0%
show 3 hidden updates…

Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Paul Blakemore I half-fancied reading this - no good?


Hannah Taylor I personally wasn't too taken by it - at least, I can't see why it won the Costa Book of the Year 2012. I wrote a small review, but don't let me put you off, you might quite like it!


message 3: by Paul (last edited Feb 24, 2012 10:28AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Blakemore Lack of real purpose in the story? Characters that are absurd and unrealistic? Writing that is experimental, unique, structureless, obscure? I'm going to have to read it now!


Hannah Taylor Ha, I'm glad I didn't deter you (and that you made it through the review)! You can have my copy if you like, I don't think I'll be reading it again - I'll ask Aimee to give it to you when school resumes if you wish.


Paul Blakemore How about a swap for Stoner? Or The Fixed Period if you like?


Hannah Taylor That's very kind of you, but only if you're sure - perhaps Stoner would make a good swap for Pure?


Paul Blakemore It's a deal. I'll put it in my bag now.


back to top