Riku Sayuj's Reviews > How to Read Literature Like a Professor: A Lively and Entertaining Guide to Reading Between the Lines
How to Read Literature Like a Professor: A Lively and Entertaining Guide to Reading Between the Lines
by Thomas C. Foster
Read literature like a Pro: A Cheat-Sheet
Foster comes across for the most part of the book as Captain Obvious, or rather Prof. Obvious and maybe even as Dr. Condescending, M.A., Ph.D., etc.
But no matter how frustrated with the book I was at times, Foster does have a language that reminded me constantly of all my english professors and since I have always loved my literature classes and the teachers, it was easier to swallow.
The book treats only very obvious and surface level things like 'if he almost drowns then he is symbolically reborn' etc. He takes us through a variety of such things ‘hidden’ in literature that we should be on the lookout for to truly enjoy any reading. The only problem is that he never goes deep enough to let help a reader think analytically of what can be considered challenging literature.
But sometime obvious things are worth restating too and sometimes they help us develop a pattern of thinking that will eventually evolve by itself into what is really required. And that in the end might be the real goal of the book. In that case Foster can consider it a reasonable success.
So here is a quick list of easy things to watch out for when you read literature:
1) Every time a character in the book takes any journey/trip of any sort, start looking for tropes like gatekeepers, dragons, treasures etc. Chances are high that it is a mythic Quest of some sort.
2) If you come across a scene involving the characters eating together, especially if a whole chapter is dedicated to it, possibly it is being used to explore their relations and it is an act of Communion with all that the word implies.
3) Vampires exist, even when they don't. If it is not Twilight, chances are that it has literary significance. And if it does, the vampire figure is probably being used to hide a lot of sexual and societal undertones about chastity and selfishness. And even when a book has nothing to do with vampires, it would serve you well to identify vampires who suck others' blood to survive.
4) Sonnet is the most used type of poetry? - Frankly I am not sure why this chapter came in and how it helps the readers in anyway except to recognize when they meet a sonnet - they look square.
5) You will meet historical figures like Napoleon, Caesar and Gandhi in many guises even when the situation does not seem to indicate it. If you do recognize this hidden historical aspect of the character, then the story will acquire a new dimension
6) References and quotations from Shakespeare and Bible, including situations and entire plots abound in literature. (Duh)
7) Fairy tales form an important part of literature too and you might want to have a look-out for Hansel and Gretel's witch anytime people get lost in unfamiliar territory.
8) Greek symbolism and myths crop up everywhere and be ready for your author being a Homer in disguise trying to tell a modern version. And most of western literature taps this well-spring
9) Weather is always symbolic and Rain, spring etc has deep rooted meaning which authors exploit consistently. If it is raining and things look gloomy, that might be irony or they might have heard of London (Foster doesn't seem to have).
10) When violence is used in a text, it is probably a plot device. So start thinking about why did he have to hit him with a baseball bat and not with a table lamp and why the character had to climb that mountain to die.
11) Almost everything that is repeated can be symbolic, even events and actions. There is no way to list them out so get in the habit of being paranoid.
12) Politics of the day inevitably seeps into any work and knowing that helps in understanding any prejudices which might not be acceptable today and also in understanding the real motivations. Who can read and understand Hemingway without knowing of his history?
13) Christ figures are everywhere and anytime anyone is even slightly noble be on the lookout for christ archetypes like disciples and sacrifice and betrayal.
14) If anyone flies or falls for too long, Icarus and his imaginary cousins are probably being invoked.
15) Lot of things can stand for sex and it is important to understand the meaning of tall buildings. If they write about sex when they mean strictly sex, we have another word for that - pornography.
16) If anyone gets wet in a book, they might change their life after that. They might be baptized into another life in short
17) Geography is probably the most important part of any novel. Geography and Season - think about why the author used that setting and the motifs of the novel will become clearer.
18) There is only One Story - whatever that means.
19) If any character has a scar (lightening?), it usually is a means to set him/her apart and the nature of the scar is symbolic. It could be scar/defect or ever a mild skin coloration - but it is a device to set up for greater things.
20) If a character is blind, ask what he is blind to or what others are blind to. It certainly is not just about physical sight.
21) Whenever any sort of illness comes in, it is usually a metaphor - especially if it is heart disease, TB (consumption), AIDS, Cancer or mysterious in some way. In literature disease is never caused by microscopic mundane things - it is caused by society and character.
22) Read any work from the time frame in which it was written.
23) Irony trumps everything else. If the author defeats your expectation with any symbol, he is so ironing you. This can work at many levels of course, he might defeat your expectation of being subject to irony by suing the actual meaning and so on.
So. Long list? Not if you read a lot. You can see all this in three days of light reading. In fact I am tending to be lenient in this review mostly due to that wonderful last chapter where he gives an example short story and analyses it. That one chapter makes the whole book worth reading. The reading list at the end is also useful and I have reproduced it here.
But getting back to the means of analyses listed above.
Were they too obvious? Or are you not confident that you will start spotting them from tomorrow? Either way, it might help us get into the habit as I said earlier and that is what really matters.
The only way to catch on to all these devices and symbols is to be familiar with them. And the only way to do that? Read, of course. Read a hell lot.
So you can see that you need to have read a lot. I mean a lot. And be very conversant with all the tropes and history of literature and myth to fully enjoy or critique serious works - that is, you need to have had a life dedicated to reading to enjoy reading.
In other words, to read literature like a professor you need to be a professor of literature. Bingo. Insight
PS. Of course the iterative growth in the pleasure of reading is known to every bookworm - we are addicted to books as it keeps getting better with every new book we read - the connections, the intertextuality and the by-lanes all become clearer and more and more FUN.
PPS. Susan Sontag makes another arbitrary appearance, haunting my reading list.
by Thomas C. Foster
Read literature like a Pro: A Cheat-Sheet
Foster comes across for the most part of the book as Captain Obvious, or rather Prof. Obvious and maybe even as Dr. Condescending, M.A., Ph.D., etc.
But no matter how frustrated with the book I was at times, Foster does have a language that reminded me constantly of all my english professors and since I have always loved my literature classes and the teachers, it was easier to swallow.
The book treats only very obvious and surface level things like 'if he almost drowns then he is symbolically reborn' etc. He takes us through a variety of such things ‘hidden’ in literature that we should be on the lookout for to truly enjoy any reading. The only problem is that he never goes deep enough to let help a reader think analytically of what can be considered challenging literature.
But sometime obvious things are worth restating too and sometimes they help us develop a pattern of thinking that will eventually evolve by itself into what is really required. And that in the end might be the real goal of the book. In that case Foster can consider it a reasonable success.
So here is a quick list of easy things to watch out for when you read literature:
1) Every time a character in the book takes any journey/trip of any sort, start looking for tropes like gatekeepers, dragons, treasures etc. Chances are high that it is a mythic Quest of some sort.
2) If you come across a scene involving the characters eating together, especially if a whole chapter is dedicated to it, possibly it is being used to explore their relations and it is an act of Communion with all that the word implies.
3) Vampires exist, even when they don't. If it is not Twilight, chances are that it has literary significance. And if it does, the vampire figure is probably being used to hide a lot of sexual and societal undertones about chastity and selfishness. And even when a book has nothing to do with vampires, it would serve you well to identify vampires who suck others' blood to survive.
4) Sonnet is the most used type of poetry? - Frankly I am not sure why this chapter came in and how it helps the readers in anyway except to recognize when they meet a sonnet - they look square.
5) You will meet historical figures like Napoleon, Caesar and Gandhi in many guises even when the situation does not seem to indicate it. If you do recognize this hidden historical aspect of the character, then the story will acquire a new dimension
6) References and quotations from Shakespeare and Bible, including situations and entire plots abound in literature. (Duh)
7) Fairy tales form an important part of literature too and you might want to have a look-out for Hansel and Gretel's witch anytime people get lost in unfamiliar territory.
8) Greek symbolism and myths crop up everywhere and be ready for your author being a Homer in disguise trying to tell a modern version. And most of western literature taps this well-spring
9) Weather is always symbolic and Rain, spring etc has deep rooted meaning which authors exploit consistently. If it is raining and things look gloomy, that might be irony or they might have heard of London (Foster doesn't seem to have).
10) When violence is used in a text, it is probably a plot device. So start thinking about why did he have to hit him with a baseball bat and not with a table lamp and why the character had to climb that mountain to die.
11) Almost everything that is repeated can be symbolic, even events and actions. There is no way to list them out so get in the habit of being paranoid.
12) Politics of the day inevitably seeps into any work and knowing that helps in understanding any prejudices which might not be acceptable today and also in understanding the real motivations. Who can read and understand Hemingway without knowing of his history?
13) Christ figures are everywhere and anytime anyone is even slightly noble be on the lookout for christ archetypes like disciples and sacrifice and betrayal.
14) If anyone flies or falls for too long, Icarus and his imaginary cousins are probably being invoked.
15) Lot of things can stand for sex and it is important to understand the meaning of tall buildings. If they write about sex when they mean strictly sex, we have another word for that - pornography.
16) If anyone gets wet in a book, they might change their life after that. They might be baptized into another life in short
17) Geography is probably the most important part of any novel. Geography and Season - think about why the author used that setting and the motifs of the novel will become clearer.
18) There is only One Story - whatever that means.
19) If any character has a scar (lightening?), it usually is a means to set him/her apart and the nature of the scar is symbolic. It could be scar/defect or ever a mild skin coloration - but it is a device to set up for greater things.
20) If a character is blind, ask what he is blind to or what others are blind to. It certainly is not just about physical sight.
21) Whenever any sort of illness comes in, it is usually a metaphor - especially if it is heart disease, TB (consumption), AIDS, Cancer or mysterious in some way. In literature disease is never caused by microscopic mundane things - it is caused by society and character.
22) Read any work from the time frame in which it was written.
23) Irony trumps everything else. If the author defeats your expectation with any symbol, he is so ironing you. This can work at many levels of course, he might defeat your expectation of being subject to irony by suing the actual meaning and so on.
So. Long list? Not if you read a lot. You can see all this in three days of light reading. In fact I am tending to be lenient in this review mostly due to that wonderful last chapter where he gives an example short story and analyses it. That one chapter makes the whole book worth reading. The reading list at the end is also useful and I have reproduced it here.
But getting back to the means of analyses listed above.
Were they too obvious? Or are you not confident that you will start spotting them from tomorrow? Either way, it might help us get into the habit as I said earlier and that is what really matters.
The only way to catch on to all these devices and symbols is to be familiar with them. And the only way to do that? Read, of course. Read a hell lot.
So you can see that you need to have read a lot. I mean a lot. And be very conversant with all the tropes and history of literature and myth to fully enjoy or critique serious works - that is, you need to have had a life dedicated to reading to enjoy reading.
In other words, to read literature like a professor you need to be a professor of literature. Bingo. Insight
PS. Of course the iterative growth in the pleasure of reading is known to every bookworm - we are addicted to books as it keeps getting better with every new book we read - the connections, the intertextuality and the by-lanes all become clearer and more and more FUN.
PPS. Susan Sontag makes another arbitrary appearance, haunting my reading list.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read How to Read Literature Like a Professor.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 02/12/2012 | page 37 |
|
12.0% | "The delight in reading the book is more about reading and thinking about old favorites like Turn of the Screw than in the obvious analytical tools the 'professor' is throwing at me." |
Comments (showing 1-50 of 84) (84 new)
message 1:
by
Tanu
(new)
Feb 14, 2012 12:58am
how is it?
reply
|
flag
*
excellent review, although, I am going to take the advice on reading a hell lot more than reading this particular book. I have had terrible experiences with condescending teachers. Needless to say, I hated them!
Tanu wrote: "excellent review, although, I am going to take the advice on reading a hell lot more than reading this particular book. I have had terrible experiences with condescending teachers. Needless to say..."Yup that is the message :)
B0nnie wrote: "how about zombies - guilt-free killing, political metaphor, the road not taken . . .?"If I create my own list I can expand it to a hundred by tonight :) But the book only tries to get you to start thinking of reading between the lines...
I love it! Armed with your Cheat-Sheet, I think I can handle the challenge (to my satisfaction, at least) without reading this book...
Jim wrote: "I love it! Armed with your Cheat-Sheet, I think I can handle the challenge (to my satisfaction, at least) without reading this book..."Thanks! I took sometime to prune the book down. Glad that you liked it!
I really hate the idea of reading as a scavenger hunt. There's something fundamentally misguided about the idea of the author hiding things, and it being the job of the reader to find what's hidden.
Duffy wrote: "I really hate the idea of reading as a scavenger hunt. There's something fundamentally misguided about the idea of the author hiding things, and it being the job of the reader to find what's hidden."If the author does not layer them, then where is the scope for any new story? Either he shouldn't use old concepts or if he uses it shouldn't be on the surface level.
Very nice review. Though I have never really thought of sonnets as being "square". Looking at my little book of Shakespeare's sonnets right here, they all look pretty rectangular :-)I don't entirely agree with Duffy's comment. For example, one novel that I think is really terrific is "The Transit of Venus", by Shirley Hazzard. One of my favorite things about it is that she communicates major plot developments in a way that's so oblique, the reader really has to pay attention in order not to miss anything. This doesn't seem like a bad thing. Another example would be T.S. Eliot's "The Waste Land", which can be enjoyed just in terms of its beautiful use of language, but there's a whole other level of enjoyment if one "gets" the richness of his references to other authors, biblical and classical mythology etc. A lot of it goes right over my head, but each time I go back and read the poem again, I discover something new, and there's something very satisfying about that.
David wrote: "Very nice review. Though I have never really thought of sonnets as being "square". Looking at my little book of Shakespeare's sonnets right here, they all look pretty rectangular :-)I don't entir..."
I agree. The richness has to come from the layers of meanings. If one reading suffices, it was not worth that reading either.
The problem for me isn't so much that an author uses allusions, etc... What I object to is the academy having latched onto this as something that makes literature superior, or even worth reading. T.S. Eliot gets taught in universities and Dylan Thomas does not. Why? I don't think its because Thomas is a worse poet. With Eliot, the professors get to have a sense of superiority, because it seems to take so much LEARNING to get at Eliot. Whereas anyone can enjoy Thomas with nothing more than a dictionary at hand. But that doesn't make Eliot necessarily superior.
For this very reason, some excellent writers tend to get neglected by the academy, precisely because their writing is clear and graceful.
Duffy wrote: "The problem for me isn't so much that an author uses allusions, etc... What I object to is the academy having latched onto this as something that makes literature superior, or even worth reading. ..."Dylan is also taught :) and Dylan too uses symbolism aplenty.
Miriam wrote: "Thank God most authors don't read books like this."authors must think same about readers :)
Riku wrote: "Dylan is also taught :) and Dylan too uses symbolism aplenty. "yeah just think of the ink spilled on - say - The pump don't work 'Cause the vandals took the handles ; - )
Re Susan Sontag's appearances:My thoughts on some issues have been influenced by her ex-husband, Philip Rieff, who I only investigated because of her.
When I was in Melbourne last year, I found a copy of one of his books that bore an inscription and signature that made it clear he had given it to someone with whom he was having an affair.
I had already spent my book budget that trip and decided not to buy it (even though it was under $15), partly because I wondered whether I was just being voyeuristic.
I repented next trip a month later and couldn't find it.
The moral: never resist voyeurism. You never know when you'll need a look.
Ian wrote: "Re Susan Sontag's appearances:My thoughts on some issues have been influenced by her ex-husband, Philip Rieff, who I only investigated because of her.
When I was in Melbourne last year, I found ..."
Nice anecdote :) and great moral. One for the ages.
Awesome review. I'm glad I can save my $12 and just read this review ha. Thanks for the reading list as well.
Richard wrote: "Great review, Riku!@ Ian: As a purvoyeur purveyor of wisdom, you are in a class by yourself!"
Thanks, RIchard! Ian is wisdom embodied. :)
s.penkevich wrote: "Awesome review. I'm glad I can save my $12 and just read this review ha. Thanks for the reading list as well."Thanks, s.p
glad that you took the trouble to go to the reading list as well...
Richard wrote: "Great review, Riku!@ Ian: As a purvoyeur purveyor of wisdom, you are in a class by yourself!"
In this esteemed and steamy company, I should be purveying pay per view.
So have you tried applying his rules to Twilight? For example, why does Edward need to do a Cesarean on Bella using his teeth in order to deliver her mutant vampire child? I have thought about this and so far have no good explanation.
Manny wrote: "So have you tried applying his rules to Twilight? For example, why does Edward need to do a Cesarean on Bella using his teeth in order to deliver her mutant vampire child? I have thought about this..."He was merely sinking his teeth into his work.
Surely it must reference/symbolize something? It doesn't come across as arbitrary, but I still can't make any sense out of it. And it's one of the few scenes in the book which has emotional resonance. Pretty much the only one everyone remembers.
This plays on our fear of both vampires and dentists. I went in for some root canal work and I came out with a caesar. Obviously, there's a risk they can get their root canals confused.
Hey, I'd never noticed the links between Twilight and Little Shop of Horrors! Audrey is Bella, needless to say, and Seymour must be Jacob. I hadn't thought of it before because I couldn't see who Edward was, but now I realize that of course he's both the dentist and the plant.Yes, this book's on the money. #3, vampires, #7, based on a classic fairytale, and #10, violence. The only thing I can't figure out is who corresponds to Mr. Mushnik.
Bird Brian wrote: "I really enjoyed the entire review, especially this:"If they write about sex when they mean strictly sex, we have another word for that - pornography.""
Thanks Brian. It is incredible what details we are trained to see :)
Yes! I knew it had to be all about dentists! Now I finally have an explanation why I always stayed a 10-foot pole away from the series! Ian and Manny, you guys are geniuses.
Manny wrote: "Just call us Captain and Lieutenant Obvious. Once we had your list, the rest was easy."If you wanna be the Captain, can I be Chenille?
That way, I could be un Papillon when I grow up.
Ian wrote: "Manny wrote: "Just call us Captain and Lieutenant Obvious. Once we had your list, the rest was easy."If you wanna be the Captain, can I be Chenille?
That way, I could be un Papillon when I grow up."
I'm feeling the Butterfly Effect: You make a tiny pun over there in Australia, and all the way across the globe, I am laughing.
Do you mean this situation has snowballs like poor old Goebells? (I wonder if anyone has ever rhymed Goebells with gerbils? Should we have a competition?)
Butterflies and Gerbils, Balls and Stones(Apologies to Don McLean, Peter Biskind and Alexander Pope)
A long long time ago
I can still
Remember when
I used to think a
Long schlong
Was something
Time would grow...
I knew that if
I had my chance
I could seduce someone
At a dance,
Pretend that I had
A modicum of style
And maybe I'd be
Happy for a while.
Do you remember when...
Hitler's ball
Had a lonely plight
Truman's Ball
Was Black and White
Warren Beatty
Eschewed romance
And placed two gerbils
Down his pants
Robert Redford got all
The best parts
Cynthia preserved Jagger's cock
In a plaster cast
Brian wandered darkly
Through the past
And Keef got strung out
On a pirate's mast.
While Charlie kept the beat
Bill sought out new child stars
Marianne satisfied herself
With just a few Mars bars
When Mick and Keef got busted
For possessing dope
The Times supported them,
Quoting Pope:
"Satire or sense, alas!
Can Sporus feel?
Who breaks a butterfly
Upon a wheel?
"Yet let me flap this bug
With gilded wings,
This painted child of dirt
That stinks and stings;
"Whose buzz the witty
And the fair annoys,
Yet wit ne'er tastes,
And beauty ne'r enjoys"
A long, long time ago
I can still remember,
A time of Raging Bulls
And Easy Riders
They all had balls then
Even women and Divine
They didn't just cast them
They put them on the line
I can still remember
All the music in the air,
Which makes me wonder
Was I really there?
Now today, Eugene Levy
He's on my TV
I mean I love this man
But all his friends are singing...
Buy, buy, this American Pie
We made a sequel
That's the equal
Of American Pie.
Ian wrote: "Butterflies and Gerbils, Balls and Stones(Apologies to Don McLean, Peter Biskind and Alexander Pope)..."
Wow, that just combines the best parts of all three authors! I'm sorry I can't vote for it. Put it somewhere I can and I'll fix that.



