Esdaile's Reviews > Peveril of the Peak

Peveril of the Peak by Walter Scott
Rate this book
Clear rating

's review
Mar 05, 2012

really liked it
bookshelves: classic-novels, historical-fiction
Read from January 29 to March 04, 2012

I am full of admiration for Walter Scott's energy and enthusiasm. This story is set in the period of the Restauration. The writer portrays the intrigue, conflict and resentment in the aftermath of a religious civil war. It reads easily and well although the language is extremely rich and I suspect archaic in parts even at the time it was written, let alone today. I liked it more than "Red Gauntlet", the other Scott novel which I have read, because I felt that the charcters were more complex and in that sense more realistic, well not all the characters, but certainly Master Bridgenorth, the religious zealotm with very much a human heart, is multi-dimensional. I have the same reservation with Soctt however, as I have with Joseph Conrad, so that I nearly awarded this book only three stars and my reservation, which I find difficult to express is that the although the author seems to be revealing very much about his charcaters and even his art, the reader (or this reader at least!) is left with the strong feeling that the author is concealing more than he reveals, both about his own sentiments and about the motivations of his characters. His characters seem to have no history not directly bearing on the story to hand. This is I suppose the "dramatic" quality of Conrad and Scott, which many people admire. However, I feel that the psychology is thrust on the reader and not explained. I wonder if anyone feels the same way about Scott or Conrad? Or not at all? I should be interested in comments on this.
1 like · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Peveril of the Peak.
Sign In »

Comments (showing 1-3 of 3) (3 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Lucy I think that was the style of the time, to tell rather than to show - Scott had his idea of the characters and wanted that to be what the readers thought as well. On the other hand, I think Conrad was one of the first authors to allow the reader to add their own view of the characters - maybe not in the early books like Lord Jim, where he leads you to see Jim's nature, but by the time of The Secret Agent it's not so clear-cut. But back to Scott, I feel he is more plot-driven anyway, no good us looking for what is not there!

Esdaile Thank you. You are the first person to comment (and my review is three years old. How much was it the "style of the time"? You may be right. It is very true of Jane Asuten and later of Dickens. "Plot driven" is entirely what Scott's novels are, so you are right there. But Shakespeare?

Esdaile When you write "style of the tme" what time do you mean? The nineteenth century?

back to top