Sparrow's Reviews > To the Lighthouse

To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf

by
1302775
's review
Jul 20, 10

bookshelves: reviewed, girls-rule, favorites, classic-or-cannonical, motherless-daughters
Recommended to Sparrow by: A terrible professor, Elizabeth, Ceridwen
Recommended for: My own Mrs. Ramsey
Read from July 12 to 17, 2010

To the Lighthouse pours over me, takes me in, cools my spirit. I come to Virginia Woolf for sympathy and plunge myself into the waves of her world, conspiring with the blunders and satisfactions of her people, but only for a moment. Just as soon as the words touch me, they steam away, leaving behind only vaporous phantoms of a house, a garden, marriage, family, waves, and a lighthouse. I don’t remember them, only their outline. But actually, the story is reality, and I am the phantom. My writing is a pose; Woolf’s is a vision.

This is the most domestic of what I have read of Woolf, but complexly so, intimately so. It is not romantic, but it is comforting and sympathetic. It is about satisfactions and dissatisfactions. This is the third (second and a half?) time I’ve read To the Lighthouse, but the first time I saw its beauty. This type of Woolf story, in my experience, becomes more real with re-readings. I learn what glasses to put on when I take up the book, so that I can see into its waters and the stories and shapes beneath the surface. The rest is not about the book, but about what it brings to mind, what it means to me. Also, perhaps spoilers, or at least alert to my badly laying down here some of Woolf’s phrases because they are knocking around in my head.

My own Mrs. Ramsey, in her comforting, regal way congratulated me on my successes in law school recently. I must take the bar myself sometime, she joked. I’ll be able to pass it just from hearing Mr. Ramsey talk about the law. “And is there any special boy in law school?” she asked. No, I answered, no special boy. But there must be a special boy for the conversation to continue, she thought. And the conversation must continue. But not without a special boy. Then we could talk about the intimacies and foreignness of men, with their socks and cigars and silences. Iron sharpens iron, Mrs. Ramsey thought. Without the special boy, without the marriage, our irons become dull; we lose our best selves.

“James, you know,” my own Mrs. Ramsey said, “I think he has a girlfriend now. Though when I was visiting, he didn’t say for sure. He was always more sensitive than my other boys. He was always my delicate spirit.”

“Oh, that’s nice,” I said warmly with a smile. When their James was moving to Eugene, the Ramseys all approached me separately. “How old are you?” they would ask. After I replied, they said without a pause, “Have you met James?” Or in the middle of discussing some details of their James moving they would pause and turn to me, “How old are you?” they would ask again. On his first day in town, they took me to see a movie with them. They all sat in a row when I arrived, so that I had to climb gracelessly across all of them and sit next to James. We were sent on walks together. Because you must marry. Women shouldn’t argue, can’t write.

Then, later, on a tour bus – I’m not kidding, really, on a tour bus – a friend and I talked about Virginia Woolf. How beautiful she was. Was she the smartest person who ever lived? How could her writing be so opaque and then suddenly transparent, as though the change was in us, and we had been looking through it the whole time. And James said, “Bah! Virginia Woolf. She can’t write.” Who can then? we asked. “Emily Dickenson.” I said, I don’t typically care for poetry.

James’ brother, sitting across the aisle burst out, “You don’t care for poetry?! How is that possible?! Poetry is life!” I like some, I said, but not all. “Who do you like?” My favorite is Li-Young Lee. He stopped, still, and looked at me, suspicious. “Are you joking?” No. “But he’s my favorite.” Irises, I said. City in which I love you, he said. He thought I loved Li-Young Lee for him, at him. And a door in my head banged shut, but in my heart a window opened. I worried that it opened to him, but it didn’t. It opened to you, to tell you this story. Later, I said, “Do you like tattoos?” He said, “They can be hot on some girls, but not usually.” I smiled, having not thought to ask whether they were hot, but didn’t correct him.

But you must marry. Women can’t paint, can’t write.

“The wedding was beautiful and funky, just like them,” Mrs. Ramsey told me after congratulating me on my law school successes. We sat outside at a table, shaded from the sun by an umbrella. Kids played in the pool and threw frisbees on the lawn. I held my friend’s baby while she high-fived the patterns on the glass table. James’ brother married the weekend before. Because you must marry. While Mrs. Ramsey’s brother drove the newlyweds to their hotel, he sang Sunrise, Sunset, and the new bride cried to be welcomed into such a family. So it is a mercy it wasn’t me because I would have laughed inappropriately, unable to sympathize, and that’s no kind of wedding story.

Instead, I learn to move the tree to the middle. I try to balance the shapes of how I see the world, and I move the tree to the middle. I refrain from telling Mrs. Ramsey about a friend who bubbles over talking about finally being herself now, divorced. It shouldn’t mean more to me that someone is happy single than happy married. And it does not mean more. I can balance the shades of my vision of life without disrespect to the mother and child in the painting. They mean something to me as well. It all means something: the pattern on the table, the clippings from a magazine, the lighthouse, the waves, marriage, the flowers in the garden, the magic fish, the cost to repair a greenhouse, thinking to Z, the shawl hanging on a picture frame, children, handing someone tools to fix a car, milk, books, writing the last sentence of a review.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read To the Lighthouse.
sign in »

Reading Progress

07/12/2010 page 146
47.0% "Did I even read this book before? It's so much more beautiful than I remember." 2 comments

Comments (showing 1-31 of 31) (31 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Ceridwen *jumping*


Sparrow I can't think how I could possibly write a review of this. It is so beautiful; your review and Elizabeth's are so beautiful. Could I say "beautiful" more times? It stuns me how completely she writes in her own style. How does a person find herself like that? I mean, find out who she really is. If I could time travel, I would go back just to shake her hand.


Ceridwen Awwww. I struggled with my own review a ton, so I know how hard it is to talk about VW's beauty. I'll just say that whenever you're ready, I would love to hear what you have to say.


Elizabeth I struggled and struggled and it still missed this great point, "Could I say "beautiful" more times? It stuns me how completely she writes in her own style. How does a person find herself like that? I mean, find out who she really is. If I could time travel, I would go back just to shake her hand."

Please right a review!


Sparrow Thanks, Elizabeth! Did you ladies ever read The Fisherman and His Wife when you were young? We had this copy of it that I loved. I read it all the time. I didn't talk about it in the review, but I think the way she hints at the story in the book is really interesting, but kind of chilling.


message 6: by Ellen (new)

Ellen What a beautiful review, Meredith!


Sparrow Thanks, Ellen!


Elizabeth And you weren't going to write a review!!!!

This is really brilliant. Particularly, How could her writing be so opaque and then suddenly transparent, as though the change was in us, and we had been looking through it the whole time.

I feel this way every time I read her books. That's just it. I love that you could describe something I've been feeling and hadn't thought to put into words. So cool.


Sparrow Awww. Thanks! Sometimes, you know, it's worth it to kind of record how I feel about a book even though it feels like I'm messing it up as a review. I know I'll look back later and feel nostalgic about it.


Elizabeth Meredith wrote: "Awww. Thanks! Sometimes, you know, it's worth it to kind of record how I feel about a book even though it feels like I'm messing it up as a review. I know I'll look back later and feel nostalgic..."

Yes (again). I like to write my review right away because I can still feel the book in a way. The more distance I get, the less the review's tone is appropriate to the book. Although it may have a lot more perspective and reasonableness; it doesn't feel right.


Sparrow Elizabeth wrote: "I like to write my review right away because I can still feel the book in a way. The more distance I get, the less the review's tone is appropriate to the book."

Especially with VW. Sometimes I need some distance, but her feeling burns off so fast for me, like I was saying, that I have to set it down while I still have it.


Ninja Sock Puppet Elizabeth wrote: "This is really brilliant. Particularly, How could her writing be so opaque and then suddenly transparent, as though the change was in us, and we had been looking through it the whole time."

I may have to stick this on my tottering to-read pile. When I read it in high school it wasn't nearly as transparent.


Sparrow Sock Puppet wrote: "I may have to stick this on my tottering to-read pile. When I read it in high school it wasn't nearly as transparent."

It was definitely not transparent when I read it in college. I don't know if being older is the thing or a repeat reading is the thing. I was so there with it this time. I wouldn't command someone to read it because they can be so tedious when you don't know what's going on, but I really loved it this time.


Ninja Sock Puppet Ceridwen said much the same thing when she recently re-read it. It gives me hope and makes me wonder what other boring or hated things from my younger years I should revisit. Something by Judy Bloom, perhaps?


Sparrow Sock Puppet wrote: "Something by Judy Bloom, perhaps?"

But where would you ever find something that specific? Oh, thank you GoodReads! So, you plan to join us for our next romp through the fields of playsure?


Ninja Sock Puppet Absolutely, Bloom was way ahead of her time. I just can't believe she wrote a book about wifi way back in the 1970s.


message 18: by Buck (new)

Buck My writing is a pose; Woolf’s is a vision.

Oh, I don't know. That last sentence, with the milk and the tools and so on, was kind of visionary.

I'm still lukewarm on Woolf. And still very warm indeed on Meredith.


Sparrow You make me blush, but thank you. It's all Woolf, though, especially everything in the last sentence. I hope you read Orlando if you haven't already.


message 20: by Manny (new) - added it

Manny Meredith, you do have a remarkable number of voices. I like this one very much. Impressed.


Elizabeth Buck wrote: "I'm still lukewarm on Woolf. And still very wa..."

Buck seems intent on liking every other woman of the age: Stein, West, Rhys, etc., and ignoring Woolf, like it's sixth grade and he's flirting with all the other girls to make Virginia jealous. It's a clever plan, Buck, but you run the risk that her parents will move and you'll never get a chance to tell her how you really feel.


Sparrow Thanks, Manny! Someday I'll find my own and really dig in, but it's not often I see someone with such a solid voice as Woolf's.

Elizabeth, you are so right - and me, too! Here I am getting e-seduced with compliments, when really it's all just a game with Woolf. Now, there's trickery. We can set you up with her, Buck. No problem.


message 23: by Manny (new) - added it

Manny By the way, you might want to check out Jan Kjærstad's Seducer trilogy. He seems to feel the same way about To The Lighthouse as you do.


Sparrow Thanks, Manny! That quote is really beautiful.


message 25: by Buck (new)

Buck Elizabeth wrote: "Buck seems intent on liking every other woman of the age: Stein, West, Rhys, etc., and ignoring Woolf, like it's sixth grade and he's flirting with all the other girls to make Virginia jealous. It's a clever plan, Buck, but you run the risk that her parents will move and you'll never get a chance to tell her how you really feel...."

That's really funny, Elizabeth. Actually, my plan was to pull her pigtails until she cried, and then wing it from there. But your idea might work too.

"E-seduced" is a generous description, Meredith. Awkward e-pass would be more accurate. And now that I’ve seen your new avatar, I’m too tongue-tied even for that. I’m just gonna go stand in the corner and look aloof.


Sparrow And me, never knowing when to kick a boy in the shins and when the bend-and-snap is better. Sigh.


message 27: by Manny (last edited Jul 24, 2010 10:06am) (new) - added it

Manny Meredith, bend-and-snap has a 98% success rate of getting a man's attention, and when used appropriately it has an 83% rate of return on a dinner invitation. Go with the numbers.


Sparrow My snap is all over the place, though.


s.penkevich Wow, great review. This book was amazing.


message 30: by Dolors (new) - added it

Dolors Can't wait to read this...great review!


Sparrow Thank you!


back to top