Krystyn's Reviews > Little Brother

Little Brother by Cory Doctorow
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books

by
238210
's review
Jun 28, 08

2 of 5 stars
Read in June, 2008

** spoiler alert ** Just finished reading the free .pdf version of Cory Doctorow's Little Brother.

The writing is not the tightest I have ever read, nor does it even begin to exude elegance, but it does a decent job of keeping you reading.

I was incredibly put off by the chapter-start bookstore dedications. It felt like a weird meta sort of pandering. This is what you do when you are relentlessly self-promotional. You tell people you like them, and tell everyone in the world their name and where they "live." The obligation to the return the favor feels like less of an obligation, so now Doctorow's cultivated a network of bookshops who are probably going to be more amenable to keeping his stuff in stock, perhaps waiting for the day he strolls in (to the brick and mortar businesses, anyway) to sign whatever they've got of his on-hand. I was never allowed to read the book purely for the first several chapters, as I was worried that I might be missing some plot-related element if I skipped the bookstore plugs. After a few chapters, it became obvious that I did not need to read them at all, and became pretty adept at skipping the italicized bits before reading on. The narrative also started to become more relaxed, so it felt easier to read once the main pin of the plot started to act as its hinge.

This novel is pretty heavy-handed. I was cool with the concepts of security theatre and freedoms being slowly, subtly, and needlessly stripped from citizens volunteering them up in the name of 'Freedom,' but I was absolutely NOT down with the 2-dimensional and laughable caricatures painting Rooney and Perfect Haircut and Charles. I don't actually care how 'real' those depictions might actually be, weirdly enough. It was a cheap narrative element, and drew me out of the story so much that I actually began to resent the narrator and the hubris layered over him by the author like thick, crusty calcium deposits. The martyrdom of Marcus is all well and good as a plot device, but other than the concert event and the flash mob, there was never any real sense of the scope of what was happening in the world of the book. It isn't until much later that you actually get some mortality numbers from the book's pivotal event, and honestly, that would've been good to know much, much earlier. It's as if none of this actually occurred to Marcus until he was forced to look at it. He was clueless about the DHS people he encountered, and it only took a few minutes of television-watching to clue him in. It was also frustrating to have him be so careful about getting off the grid when the vans came by, and to make such a huge point of it, but then, when it mattered the most (after he escaped from Masha in the moving truck), when he was keeping the evidence he most needed alive and accessible (Masha's phone), he didn't seem to care much at all about being detected.

I dunno. It's a decent read, but it felt sort of hacked together, more than a little holier-than-thou. Appropriating the "Don't trust anyone over 30" slogan and re-tooling it to "25" thoroughly pissed me off, for obvious reasons. I am not the enemy, and I do not come from a generation that defines the habit of voluntarily giving up one's freedoms. I became a teenager during the Cold War, and I remember what it was like to constantly fear nuclear fallout from an attack, of Ronnie accidentally pushing the wrong button. Maybe that's something Doctorow felt necessary to put into a Young Adult book, but as a teenager, I would've found that a little insulting, especially since Marcus shows plenty of trust in his History teacher and later on, the journalist. It's ridiculous that they are painted as the exception to the rule. What a grim message to send to teenagers, who already might feel disenfranchised by simply being teenagers.

Anyway, I read it. It was intriguing initially because the kids were playing a game they called an ARG (I would have liked to have heard even more about it, but whatever), but the rest of it was, strangely enough, a lot of fear mongering, grandstanding, and a coupla sex scenes. Oh, and I was pretty irritated that Darryl became a footnote, collateral damage, unexplored. What happened to him was pretty interesting, and would have given much more gravitas to the themes of the book, but it was more important to have Marcus and Ange close out the book by sweatily groping each other in a little tiny office with their shiny new hip revolution. Sigh.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Little Brother.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-18 of 18) (18 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

J.D. "Chapter start bookstore dedications": These aren't in the hardcover version. I guess when you get something for free you have to sit through a commercial or two. :-)


Krystyn I guess. ;)

It was still really weird. And awkward. I just 'fast-forwarded' past it all ...


Deana someone's gotta pay for the free edition.


message 4: by MD (new) - rated it 2 stars

MD I was bothered by many of the same things you were - the scope, the empathy-as-an-afterthought treatment of the loss of life in the explosion, the sidelining of Darryl, etc. It's readable, but it's no 1984 for the modern age.

(I read the hardcover so missed the bookstore stuff you mention.)


C12vt I thought part of the point of the "don't trust anyone over 25" bit was a foil to the end of the book, where Marcus had matured enough to leave that attitude behind. He tells his parents (part of the truth anyhow), he tells the reporter, he realizes he needs the adult world.

In the end, it's his going public that really changes things. Not that all his teenage hackerwork was pointless, but the reporter saved the day at the end - using the data he gave her, but without adult help he would have been stuck on Gitmo-by-the-Bay.

Some of your criticisms of Marcus' behavior and attitude - his cluelessness, his lack of perspective - rang true for me, but I actually found those to be good things. Marcus isn't superhuman, and he isn't unrealistically mature for his age; this makes him a more believable character for me. I thought Doctorow struck a really good balance between accurately portraying teenagers without patronizing them.

Also, though we don't get the exact figure until later, the mortality numbers are given as "about four thousand" as early as chapter 9.


Krystyn C12vt wrote: "I thought part of the point of the "don't trust anyone over 25" bit was a foil to the end of the book

I'll buy that - in fact, I may have even had that thought at one point, but felt like that particular aspect was not really pointed up enough to have an impact. The take-away for me as a teenager would have likely been the initial slogan, and not its teaching moment later on.

I suppose I felt dismay at stuff that just felt so facile in its telling. We never got to hear anything about the ARG (which was the primary reason for me to read it, I will admit, as I am an ARG designer), and I felt like the 'near future' feeling was just a little too polished towards making authority the automatic Big Bad.

Maybe someday several years from now, I'll give the book a re-read, and see how it ages. I'm still not overly fond of the experience I had, though, to look forward to that day. ;)




Todd oh man i really liked your review but also liked the book, but now like the book less having read your review. i'm just a soggy piece of matzah.


message 8: by Philip (new)

Philip It's funny that you pointed out the whole "don't trust anyone over 25" thing. I was hanging on through the flippant attitude toward teen alcohol and drug use, but when the girl said don't trust old people, your parents, anyone over 25- I hung it up and decided it wasn't worth the effort. As a recovered teenager and the father of a 16 yr old I found that a pill too hard to swallow for me when no one objected to that bit of goofiness. Nice review, although I'm a fan of Ronnie's ;0)


message 9: by E (new) - rated it 4 stars

E DB ARGs are real but have been turned into marketing ploys. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_r...


Brian Mmm hmm, I can get behind almost everything you said. The storycraft of Little Brother is not very good. Like you, I was struck especially by how little attention was paid to Darryl, whose plight was the nominal reason for the entire narrative. There were a lot of loose ends -- when did the much-played-up web of trust ever come in handy, for example, except as an excuse for the narrator to meet his girlfriend? Whatever happened to the actual terrorists? -- and your phrase "heavy-handed" is, if anything, generous.

The only bone I'd pick about your review is your feeling that the scope of events wasn't well established by the narrative. The concert and flash mob were the parts we got to see directly, but the online movement is convincingly portrayed as growing in size and importance. Think of the press conference. Think of when the entire Bay Area is brought to a standstill after m1k3y suggests arphid abuse to the Xnet. For that matter, think of the Xnet's establishment and how DHS is forced to respond. I really enjoyed how Doctorow painted a living, burgeoning civil disobedience movement that outgrew the guy who thought of it.

Two cents :) Thanks for the review!


message 11: by Lauren (new)

Lauren  Valentino The "don't trust over 25" is not taken that seriously in the novel. The punky rocker chick who gives the concert points this out when she gets on the mic and says that she is over 25 but is wildly supportive of the rebellion. It's hard to give credibility to a review from someone who admitted to "skimming" over most of the book. Fail.


Krystyn Hi Lauren,

You will find that the only thing I skipped were the pre-chapter text ads for various bookstores, which were formatted into the 'free' version of the book and have nothing to do with the actual content.

It's OK; you probably skimmed my review. ;)


Krystyn E wrote: "ARGs are real but have been turned into marketing ploys. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternate_reality_game"

Yes, I know. I've worked on some of them. :)


message 14: by Lauren (new)

Lauren  Valentino As I read the actual paper book, I didn't know that's what you referring to when you said "italicized" text. One of the later comments made it clearer to me that you had read a different version than I. It seemed to explain how you missed the part about the rocker chick being over 25 as well.


Krystyn I could have made it clearer that the .pdf version had bookstore dedications at the start of each chapter, it's true.

Well, clearly he's been dealing with people that are older than 25 throughout the entire book. That's actually part of the issue I had with it.

I stand by my initial feeling of being irked by the slogan - I am not convinced that it was successfully played out as irony/Marcus'-growth-as-a-person at the end. It seems like plenty of people who read the book have varying feelings on this point, from what I've seen in other reviews.


Dana * i thought the tone of the book fit with the 17 old narrator. In fact, that is one of the things I liked most. I mean, from a 17 year old point of view, it was actually a little mature, gave me hope for youth. The story never left the narrator point of view, so we only see the scope of the events in terms of the narrator and his world.


message 17: by A.wd (new)

A.wd I think the good thing about the book is, it captures that single minded right/wrong ideallism of being young, and wanting to rebel. Your right some of the characters come off as 2d caricatures, but they should and would to a kid who's previous biggest problem was an ARG and skipping school. I did enjoy it, and it touched my rebellious idealistic side ;) thanks for your thoughts!


Melissa Ruhl Very interesting review. Even though I thoroughly enjoyed the book, I can see several of your points. The thing I most agree with was his treatment of Darryl. On the one hand, I want to say that perhaps Doctorow was not portraying Marcus's grief/conflicted regret because Marcus was an immature teen. Yet Doctorow did feel empowered to let Marcus confront all sorts of extremely complex emotional issues. So I dunno.

Great review, even though I enjoyed it much more :)


back to top