Emma Deplores Goodreads Censorship's Reviews > I Capture the Castle

I Capture the Castle by Dodie Smith
Rate this book
Clear rating

's review
Mar 30, 2012

really liked it
bookshelves: england, epistolary, classics, 4-stars
Read from March 12 to 16, 2012

This is a fun, charming little book, written in a sort of loose diary format from the perspective of a girl living in 1930’s rural England. Most of its appeal is in Cassandra’s voice, which is very strong, and its portrayal of a coming-of-age story that’s enjoyable and lighthearted, but without being dumb or shallow in retrospect.

Cassandra and her family live in an old castle, and they’ve been sinking into poverty since her author-father hasn’t written anything for years. Much of the book focuses on the romantic escapades of Cassandra and her older sister Rose, when two eligible young American men move in nearby. But the book isn’t a romance; it’s a story about growing up, and Cassandra wrestles with her relationships with family members, her (lack of) religious beliefs and her writing skills--she’s keeping a journal as practice for writing a novel, which neatly explains the inclusion of scenes and dialogue in someone’s diary.

The book starts out a bit slowly, but gets going after about 50 pages and is an entertaining read. “Charming” is probably the best word for it. Cassandra stands out for her mix of intelligence and naïveté; she’s quite perceptive about people, but doesn’t know much about life. She feels real and authentic (minus one problem that I’ll get to later). It’s interesting to see all the other characters through Cassandra’s eyes, because several are not very nice and yet everything we hear about them is filtered through Cassandra’s deep-seated affection for them. The book makes excellent use of voice and perspective and never forgets who is telling the tale. And the writing style is good, but believable coming from a 17-18 year old girl. Some episodes are downright amusing, and the book does a good job recalling what it’s like to grow up.

My biggest problem with the book was that I experienced a lot of dissonance regarding Cassandra’s (and Rose’s) actual age. Cassandra is 17-18 and Rose 20-21, but both felt 3-4 years younger. A lot of that is probably cultural and as a historical fiction reader I should be used to this, but I think the fact that the book is set in relatively modern times actually made this worse. There’s the way people around Cassandra infantilize her--their constantly referring to her as a “child” (even her significantly-older love interest does this, which is creepy) and, for instance, asking if she’s old enough to attend a dinner party (why wouldn’t she be?) had me picturing her as about 12. And then, neither she nor Rose seems to have any future plans; Cassandra has no thought of leaving home; neither has any work experience or marketable skills; neither has ever thought herself in love or so much as kissed a boy. (Rose, whom we’re told is beautiful, “first realizes” her power over men during the book. I know they live in a remote area, but surely she’d encountered male attention before?) So, Cassandra’s experience of being 17-18 felt more like my experience of being 15. Which surprised me a bit, because we think of ourselves as growing up slowly in the U.S. these days. On the bright side, though, the fact that I can relate to Cassandra’s experiences at all speaks well of the book.

Possibly I just read this book at the wrong age (mid-20s). It’s probably best read by either teenagers a few years younger than Cassandra, or adults decades removed who want to look back nostalgically on their teen years. One of the things Smith does very well here is write a book that can appeal to both kids and adults; perhaps because it was written before the “young adult” genre was born, it’s appropriate for young readers without ever feeling patronizing or whitewashed.

Also, I read the edition with the movie cover, but disliked it so intensely that I'm listing the hardcover edition so I don't have to look at it again.
5 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read I Capture the Castle.
Sign In »

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Pauline (new)

Pauline Ross This is on my list of possible reads for my book club. I hesitated a bit because - 17 year old protagonist, that sounds a bit YA, and I'm not sure I want to inflict that on my group. But it does sound good.

I love these subtle social distinctions between then and now. Children then were children (as in innocent of the world) for much longer, I think. There was no TV, no colour movies even, just books and newspapers, and a 17 year old would definitely be regarded as a child. Kids nowadays are much more worldly wise. They may be educated for a long time, but in other ways they are grown up at 12 or thereabouts.

Aristocratic families would have a 'season' for a girl when she came out into society, got presented at court, went to balls and looked around for a husband. Upper middle class families (as I guess this lot were, having a castle and all) would not have anything quite so definite, and it would be quite a big decision as to when she was old enough to socialise with the grownups at dinner parties and the like. 17 would be quite young for that. For boys, they would be adult when they went up to university, or finished their schooling (girls weren't educated, of course!). Different times. Cue quotes about the past being a different country...

Emma Deplores Goodreads Censorship Oh, the past is definitely a different country, and I'm guessing the reason I had so much dissonance with this one is that it was written contemporaneously rather than as historical fiction--so it's written as "a story about being 17" rather than "a story about England in the 1930s." Of course, books written contemporaneously are probably the best way to learn about a place and time, since they aren't filtered through a different cultural lens! So I realize nearly everything I cited as being weird is cultural--but in so many ways the book feels modern. Cassandra is educated--she finished school not long before the story starts, and later on there's some talk about her going to university. The idea of her and Rose getting jobs is also discussed, but abandoned when the characters conclude that they have no marketable skills. And she travels around the country independently or with young men and nobody bats an eyelash. So we're hardly talking the Middle Ages here.

Your point about dinner parties is duly noted--it's just a throwaway line in the book (her father responds with something like "of course she's old enough") which is probably why it raised my eyebrows so much. Eating dinner with family and friends seems like a very safe, unchallenging activity and I'm pretty sure I did that starting as soon as I was old enough to sit still for that long. But, I see the cultural distinction there. (And the family probably is upper middle class, if you're thinking of "class" as differently from "how much money you have," which seems to be how the characters in the book think of it--even though they're going hungry at the beginning, they seem to think of themselves not as poor people but as people who happen to be poor right now. The castle, though, they're renting and it's mostly in ruins.)

At any rate, I think this would be a great book club book! Tons of books for adults feature teenage protagonists so I wouldn't worry about that. It doesn't have that sort of watered-down "YA feel" at all and I think it would generate some really interesting discussion in a group of adults.

back to top