Kat Kennedy's Reviews > Incarnate

Incarnate by Jodi Meadows
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
3270188
's review
Dec 12, 11

bookshelves: kat-s-book-reviews, the-great-shelf-of-meh
Read in November, 2011

Incarnate had such an interesting premise that I rushed to request the ARC. The concept of a society of people constantly reincarnating and being reborn to each other was too good to pass up. Blue Bloods had a poor crack at it and I hoped Incarnate would fare better. Alas, no. What Incarnate had the opportunity of doing was taking philosophy by the horns and riding that bull like a cowboy at a rodeo. Instead, incarnate chose Philosophy!Bull's friend, Philosophy Show Pony and skipped along very slowly and sweetly to Romance Ranch. There it stayed, refusing to budge from it's very comfortable stall until the last thirty pages where it promptly collapsed in a fit of seizures and died. I can only hope Meadow's next book in the series won't be beating a dead horse.

One could reasonably argue that this is just YA literature and perhaps I was expecting too much. However, I think that's not crediting teenagers with enough. A book such as Incarnate has the opportunity to reflect on our society in so many ways, to do so much! How does possession change when no one really dies? How does parenting change when babies are really just miniature adults waiting to get back to their own lives? How does society change? Is there really murder and would it even be a big deal? What about debt? What happens if you can't die to escape that? What does it do to a psyche to die and be reborn constantly? Over time you will have probably given birth to, married, or been parented by almost everyone you know. How does that change the way you see people?

These questions are only very briefly looked at and none are truly answered in any satisfactory way. Instead, the world of Incarnate is eerily like our own with only a few minor changes to the facade.

This is not meant to imply that Meadows is a bad author. What she does do, she does well. The focus in the novel is heavily situated on the romance. It's a very sweet, endearing romance and the characters are lovely. Yet, if I'd wanted a cutsie romance then I have chicken soup for the soul for that.

No, Meadow can write well with lovely descriptions and sweet romantic talk and tense, dramatic, emotional scenes. If I were to sum up her writing style and JUST the romantic aspects of this book, I would say 'lovely'.

But this book looked to be more than just a YA romance and in that it failed. The mystery was flirted with occasionally but otherwise forgotten until the very end, there was almost no action or suspense to speak of outside the very beginning and very end. Some characters were contradictory and nonsensical, some plot elements just didn't fit, etc.

Mostly, where the book failed is that I have no interest in reading any more of this series. I've read my fill of chaste kisses, reluctant love, obstacles to affection, with a cursory nod at plot that only advances at a snails pace amid so much potential. That's all this book was and I currently don't see any potential for the series to be anything more than that. Thus I have no intention at the moment of reading this book's incarnate.

You can read this review on my blog:

blog linkAudio Button
70 likes · likeflag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Incarnate.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-12 of 12) (12 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Steph Sinclair I can't wait to see your thoughts on this. Total disappointment for me.


message 2: by Shirley (new)

Shirley Marr GREAT review Kat.

Instead, incarnate chose Philosophy!Bull's friend, Philosophy Show Pony and skipped along very slowly and sweetly to Romance Ranch.<-- Love this! Hee hee.


Steph Sinclair So we share the same thoughts on this one. I agree the romance was nice at times, but it overshadowed the plot.


message 4: by Kenya (new)

Kenya Wright Dang that sucks. It had such a groovy cover too.


message 5: by Maya (new) - added it

Maya Everybody seems to be saying the same. It's yet another romance story hidden under a Dystopia-coating (and an awesome cover).


message 6: by Marg (new)

Marg K. "One could reasonably argue that this is just YA literature and perhaps I was expecting too much. However, I think that's not crediting teenagers with enough."

Yes, thank you! That is my biggest gripe with the vast majority of YA fiction being released these days. Too much of it is being oversimplified & dumbed down when it really doesn't have to be. Teens don't just want fancy bells & whistles with lots of pretty glitter thrown on top. They want substance too.


Kat Kennedy Mary, I'm glad I'm not the only one. I recall as a teenager I did love romantic story angles but I think Harry Potter shows that teens are also looking into stories with a lot more layers than just that. Being a teenager is more complex than just relationships.


Josiah Where do you "request" ARC's


message 10: by [deleted user] (new)

Huh. What a pity. It seemed like a premise with a lot of promise. I hate when authors waste them.


message 11: by Misskitty_06 (new)

Misskitty_06 I think I made it to the 4th or 5th chapter and put it down. SO bad.


message 12: by Zarah (new) - added it

Zarah ROFL!
What Incarnate had the opportunity of doing was taking philosophy by the horns and riding that bull like a cowboy at a rodeo. Instead, incarnate chose Philosophy!Bull's friend, Philosophy Show Pony and skipped along very slowly and sweetly to Romance Ranch. There it stayed, refusing to budge from it's very comfortable stall until the last thirty pages where it promptly collapsed in a fit of seizures and died. I can only hope Meadow's next book in the series won't be beating a dead horse.
I read this aloud to DH and he laughed as much as I did. You SURE have a way with words!

...and with making it clear to mewhat books to read andwhat books to not read. This went straight from the former to the latter, during the time it took me to read the intro of your review. Thanks! :)


back to top