Jimyanni's Reviews > The Farther Shore

The Farther Shore by Christie Golden

by
2858587
's review
Nov 12, 11

bookshelves: star-trek
Read in November, 2011

I only have two quibbles with this book that keep it from being a five-star review: One, most importantly and most obviously to anyone who's familiar with my reviews, is that it's only half a story, and I will never give any book that is not a complete story in and of itself five stars; this book has no beginning. One could not pick it up and read it without having read "Homecoming" without being almost completely lost.

This does not mean that the entire history of the Voyager series has to be re-told in every book; I accept that one assumes that a fan of the series is the target audience, and knows the backstory. But the individual plot specific to the book should be told in one book, with a beginning, a middle, and an end. At the very least, a longer, more involved story should evolve like the Harry Potter books did for the first five books: each book should have a major plot that begins and ends within the book, while moving the background plot further along towards resolution.

The second quibble I have, and it's a minor one, is that the subplot involving B'elanna Torres seemed totally irrelevant to the rest of the book, and would have been better as a separate story all its own. As a minor subplot, it was just a distraction and that didn't do justice to it.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Farther Shore.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-4 of 4) (4 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Michael (new) - added it

Michael Arvizu Well, then read "Homecoming!" No one says you're supposed to read it by itself. It even says on the cover: "The exciting conclusion to the 'Homecoming' adventure." That should give you a clue that you shouldn't read this volume first. It's like saying the third Harry Potter book is one-seventh of a story. Well of course it is, without reading the first two!


Jimyanni Actually, the third Harry Potter book is a full story all by itself. Those stories are good examples of how a continuing series OUGHT to be written (except for books six and seven, which ran together.) Each book from one through five was a complete story by itself, even though it continued the overall plot of the series. Each book had an internal conflict that was resolved at the end of the book, and each book started from a reasonable beginning point, even though regular readers knew what had come before.


message 3: by Michael (new) - added it

Michael Arvizu What is your definition of a "reasonable beginning point"?


Jimyanni Mostly, "one that does not follow an unreasonable ending point", aka a cliffhanger ending. I'll admit that that's a fairly subjective definition. The only other definition that I could give is one that is just as subjective: "One that feels like the beginning of a story, rather than like you're coming in in the middle of things".


back to top