Brian Hodges's Reviews > Fahrenheit 451
Fahrenheit 451
by Ray Bradbury
by Ray Bradbury
Brian Hodges's review
bookshelves: classics, bloody-brilliant, dystopia
Jul 14, 08
bookshelves: classics, bloody-brilliant, dystopia
Read in July, 2008
Believe me, I'm not the kind of guy who gushes over classics simply by virtue of the fact that they are classics, but this one was worth all the legend that it carries with it. I'm glad I never had to read this book in highschool. First of all, we would have ruined this truly awesome story by overanalyzing every mundane literary aspect, detail and device. Second, the story is SO much more profound in the year 2008 at the age of 30 than it could have been at 17 in 1995.
I always thought this was a book about the evils of government and how the folks in charge will try to restrict thought. After all, as the title of the book indicates, this is that story about "burning books." But Bradbury goes way deeper than some mere indictment of fascism. Taking place in the future, people of society have withdrawn from each other, focusing all their attention on mindless entertainment in the form of giant TV rooms and earphones. Books in this society are banned and "firemen" are put to work burning down the houses of anyone caught in possession of them. But as one character points out, government doesn't do anything that the people aren't already calling for and this assault on books is really just the natural byproduct of a society full of self-absorbed people who are pulling away more and more from any kind of thought deeper than what their television asks of them.
Reading this book in a year where reality TV, a thousand different video game consoles and half a billion mindless internet sites provide a good chunk of our mental stimulation, and where people routinely drown the world and everyone in it out via their iPod headphones, it's eerie just how prophetic this story is... considering it was released in the 1950's.
But this book isn't merely some kind of morality play. The story itself follows the transition of Guy Montag, from a book-leery, burn-happy "fireman" into a man who is on the run for not only possessing books, but killing a fellow fireman to protect them. There's action. There's intrigue. Ther's violence. There's character development. There's a story that you can actually follow and stay interested in. There's one particularly vivid and chilling description of a woman's final moment of life before a nuclear bomb goes off over her head. And yes, woven seamlessly into the exciting narrative are plenty of ideas to ponder regarding our direction as a society and the danger of never pursuing knowledge deeper than who got booted off 'Big Brother'.
I always thought this was a book about the evils of government and how the folks in charge will try to restrict thought. After all, as the title of the book indicates, this is that story about "burning books." But Bradbury goes way deeper than some mere indictment of fascism. Taking place in the future, people of society have withdrawn from each other, focusing all their attention on mindless entertainment in the form of giant TV rooms and earphones. Books in this society are banned and "firemen" are put to work burning down the houses of anyone caught in possession of them. But as one character points out, government doesn't do anything that the people aren't already calling for and this assault on books is really just the natural byproduct of a society full of self-absorbed people who are pulling away more and more from any kind of thought deeper than what their television asks of them.
Reading this book in a year where reality TV, a thousand different video game consoles and half a billion mindless internet sites provide a good chunk of our mental stimulation, and where people routinely drown the world and everyone in it out via their iPod headphones, it's eerie just how prophetic this story is... considering it was released in the 1950's.
But this book isn't merely some kind of morality play. The story itself follows the transition of Guy Montag, from a book-leery, burn-happy "fireman" into a man who is on the run for not only possessing books, but killing a fellow fireman to protect them. There's action. There's intrigue. Ther's violence. There's character development. There's a story that you can actually follow and stay interested in. There's one particularly vivid and chilling description of a woman's final moment of life before a nuclear bomb goes off over her head. And yes, woven seamlessly into the exciting narrative are plenty of ideas to ponder regarding our direction as a society and the danger of never pursuing knowledge deeper than who got booted off 'Big Brother'.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Fahrenheit 451.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Delana
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Sep 28, 2009 10:22am
Put a spoiler alert on your review, please. Good review otherwise.
reply
|
flag
*
One of the things that stood out for me was that they actually specified "illegal" book as if there were some "legal" ones. It turns out of course that most any book is illegal especially literary or thought provoking ones. (This book itself is of course thought provoking.) Socioty collapses and burns in the end of this book and the "book people" will participate in rebuilding....will that socioty be the same, will it collapse and burn to? Maybe it's a hopeful ending, I'm sure we all "hope" so. Of course I'm sure the irony of our discussing this on an electronic web sight hasn't escaped you.
Ok, now I'll understand. I read, I reviewed but I just couldn't understand the bigger picture. I guess just like you said about being young and interpreting every small word, passage by passage. This book, reflecting now was a good book, I guess. I think I might just have to pick it up when I'm a bit older- a bit more mature to understand that books, especially classics would give you more to love if you read them for the sake of reading them and not for the sake of reading "classics" Thanks Again, for the slight slanted epiphany. -Steve
Amen to that Steve. I really do believe that English classes in this country discourage literature more than they encourage people to read and appreciate it. One that's on my list to read again outside the lens of getting a grade on it is "The Great Gatsby". So many of my friends say they loved it. But I spent so much time underlining stuff that I honestly don't even remember what the story was about.
I never cared for Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby or any of the "school" of lit. to nihilistic for me. I feel the same way about Steinbeck. Talented writers, but the whole "life stinks and then you die" school is just too much for me.
"The story is SO much more profound in the year 2008 at the age of 30 than it could have been at 17 in 1995." I wholly agree with you.. I had the same response in 2012 at the age of 39. :)

