Gloria Mundi's Reviews > The Woman in Black
The Woman in Black
by Susan Hill, John Lawrence
by Susan Hill, John Lawrence
Gloria Mundi's review
bookshelves: creeptastic, ghosties, gothika, down-the-memory-lane, snoozefest
May 25, 12
bookshelves: creeptastic, ghosties, gothika, down-the-memory-lane, snoozefest
Read from February 20 to 23, 2012
I read this book mainly because I went to see the play at the Fortune Theatre in London a few weeks ago. The play was really good. It wasn't the scariest thing I have ever experienced, as some reviews claim, but it did make me jump and it was a fantastic performance carried entirely by two actors, with most of the fear factor delivered through good old fashioned darkness, sudden noises, closeness of the atmosphere (it was the smallest theatre I have ever been in) and the audience interaction (there were very frequent shrieks), rather than any advanced technology or complicated props. The play has been performed in London for the last 23 years and remains hugely popular, so I would thouroughly recommended it if you are ever in London and are theatrically inclined.
The Woman in Black is a short novella written by Susan Hill in the 1980s which tells the story of a young solicitor Arthur Kipps and his terrifying encounter with a ghost in a small market town on the East coast of England where he is sent to settle the affairs of Alice Drablow, an old lady recently deceased. The novella is a pastiche on the Victorian gothic literature and it certainly read very authentic with its languorous pace, isolated gloomy manorhouse setting and extensive descriptions of fog and other kinds of dreary weather. But therein also lies the main problem I had with this book. I can well understand the need to set the mood and the scene with some description of nature and the surroundings, but when I am faced with paragraph after paragraph describing the colour of mud and the dripping sky, my eyes soon start to glaze over. The intro and the build-up to the actual story were also far too long, given the overall length of the book (it is 30-odd pages before the hero even gets to the place in a book that's only 138 pages long) and the ending was too rushed and abrupt in comparison. Also, the comic relief, which was very well done in the play, was sadly missing from the book.
Overall, however, this was an interesting story and a quick read and I look forward to seeing what they have done with it in the film.
The Woman in Black is a short novella written by Susan Hill in the 1980s which tells the story of a young solicitor Arthur Kipps and his terrifying encounter with a ghost in a small market town on the East coast of England where he is sent to settle the affairs of Alice Drablow, an old lady recently deceased. The novella is a pastiche on the Victorian gothic literature and it certainly read very authentic with its languorous pace, isolated gloomy manorhouse setting and extensive descriptions of fog and other kinds of dreary weather. But therein also lies the main problem I had with this book. I can well understand the need to set the mood and the scene with some description of nature and the surroundings, but when I am faced with paragraph after paragraph describing the colour of mud and the dripping sky, my eyes soon start to glaze over. The intro and the build-up to the actual story were also far too long, given the overall length of the book (it is 30-odd pages before the hero even gets to the place in a book that's only 138 pages long) and the ending was too rushed and abrupt in comparison. Also, the comic relief, which was very well done in the play, was sadly missing from the book.
Overall, however, this was an interesting story and a quick read and I look forward to seeing what they have done with it in the film.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Woman in Black.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-5 of 5) (5 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Gina
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
May 24, 2012 01:41pm
the newer movie version of this is pretty good...a totally creepy, psychological thriller! I'm interested to compare the book to it...it is strange that it is only 138 pages..which does seem rushed after seeing the film!
reply
|
flag
*
I still haven't got around to the movie. Is Daniel Radcliffe good in it? I haven't seen him in anything other than Harry Potter yet.
Yeah, pretty good for the role he plays, just as good as he was in harry potter..though the character is not as "dramatic" as harry's I do believe this is his first film after Harry potter. I would describe the movie as Jane Austen meets "The Ring" very creepy!


