karen's Reviews > Zone One
Zone One
by Colson Whitehead
AHHHHHHHH!!!
jesus christ, but colson whitehead can write. i read the intuitionist way back when everyone was praising it to the moon as the masterpiece of the next great american writer, but that book didn't really do a lot for me, while this one keel-hauled me.
it was strolling along at a solid four stars until the ending, which just reached in-between my ribs with insistent fingers and squeezed and squeezed and squeezed. the last 100 pages or so just blew me away. and it's not even a long book, 259 pages, but it took me three days to read; partly circumstantial, partly because unpacking his sentences takes a really long time. this man is the master of the dense sentence. and also at creating these descriptive arabesques of imaginative digression: speculations about characters that do not exist in the novel as such, but are representative of a type of person who might still be existing in this post-infestation world and what that type of person might be doing, thinking, even though they are only a subjunctive character in a three-sentence authorial daydream. who bothers to do that? it is madness! but a madness that stands out as a truly original technique of an incredible writer.
this is both not at all a zombie book and the purest zombie book i have ever read. it is so hard to describe it. i am going to have to read it again, because circumstances muddied up the first half of the book for me a little. part of that is that i really feel this book should be read with as few breaks in the reading as possible. there are so many details, many of whose significance do not become apparent until much later - it is best to read with full attention, in as straight a sitting as you can manage.
ceridwen's review is probably the best review i have ever read. not just for this book, but ever. i would love to review her review, but i don't think i am even savvy enough to articulate how perfect that review is, never mind trying to discuss this book. i love this part best: Then there is the New Yorkiness of this book, a resident recounting his mixed irritation and affection for the cityest of American cities, carefully prodding nostalgia that at any moment might stir and bite. And when it does, put it down with a bullet. that is a perfect encapsulation of this book. whitehead takes the danny hoch stance of "gee, new york (brooklyn, for hoch) is really changing" and ramps it up with fury. and yet - it is new york, and always will be, no matter how many trust fund babies move in, no matter how many buildings have their outsides gentrified or mirrored, no matter how many zombies cross over into it from new jersey. whitehead's final panning shot of the zombies is a masterful and familiar descriptive passage, despite being utterly horrifying. this is new york, warts and all.
it's a very emotional book, despite a main character who is more a bundle of instinctual calculations than emotions. even before the events, he is someone who carefully gauges what he can get away with, what he can do to pass through life with the least resistance, rather than someone who is experiencing life as a series of emotional occurrences. a coaster. so, in many ways, the perfect observer, the perfect survivor. and yet - the surroundings are definitely meant to inspire an emotional response, even to non new-yorkers. new york is a microcosm to the world, after all, the corroded melting pot. and this situation, eyeballed by this character - the extraordinary translated by the mediocre - is made all the more haunting for it.
now i understand the whitehead hype.
aside: i was actually in tribeca on tuesday, where the action of this novel takes place, and i could not help superimposing the narrative upon the scenery - the nearness to halloween didn't hurt matters. but yeah, a terrible part of town to try to withstand a zombie apocalypse. and, to ceridwen, i understand your bristling at the midwest barb - there was a little one for queens, too. why i oughtta!
by Colson Whitehead
karen's review
bookshelves: death-is-not-the-end, tastes-like-people, october-is-spooky
Dec 27, 11
bookshelves: death-is-not-the-end, tastes-like-people, october-is-spooky
Read from October 25 to 27, 2011
AHHHHHHHH!!!
jesus christ, but colson whitehead can write. i read the intuitionist way back when everyone was praising it to the moon as the masterpiece of the next great american writer, but that book didn't really do a lot for me, while this one keel-hauled me.
it was strolling along at a solid four stars until the ending, which just reached in-between my ribs with insistent fingers and squeezed and squeezed and squeezed. the last 100 pages or so just blew me away. and it's not even a long book, 259 pages, but it took me three days to read; partly circumstantial, partly because unpacking his sentences takes a really long time. this man is the master of the dense sentence. and also at creating these descriptive arabesques of imaginative digression: speculations about characters that do not exist in the novel as such, but are representative of a type of person who might still be existing in this post-infestation world and what that type of person might be doing, thinking, even though they are only a subjunctive character in a three-sentence authorial daydream. who bothers to do that? it is madness! but a madness that stands out as a truly original technique of an incredible writer.
this is both not at all a zombie book and the purest zombie book i have ever read. it is so hard to describe it. i am going to have to read it again, because circumstances muddied up the first half of the book for me a little. part of that is that i really feel this book should be read with as few breaks in the reading as possible. there are so many details, many of whose significance do not become apparent until much later - it is best to read with full attention, in as straight a sitting as you can manage.
ceridwen's review is probably the best review i have ever read. not just for this book, but ever. i would love to review her review, but i don't think i am even savvy enough to articulate how perfect that review is, never mind trying to discuss this book. i love this part best: Then there is the New Yorkiness of this book, a resident recounting his mixed irritation and affection for the cityest of American cities, carefully prodding nostalgia that at any moment might stir and bite. And when it does, put it down with a bullet. that is a perfect encapsulation of this book. whitehead takes the danny hoch stance of "gee, new york (brooklyn, for hoch) is really changing" and ramps it up with fury. and yet - it is new york, and always will be, no matter how many trust fund babies move in, no matter how many buildings have their outsides gentrified or mirrored, no matter how many zombies cross over into it from new jersey. whitehead's final panning shot of the zombies is a masterful and familiar descriptive passage, despite being utterly horrifying. this is new york, warts and all.
it's a very emotional book, despite a main character who is more a bundle of instinctual calculations than emotions. even before the events, he is someone who carefully gauges what he can get away with, what he can do to pass through life with the least resistance, rather than someone who is experiencing life as a series of emotional occurrences. a coaster. so, in many ways, the perfect observer, the perfect survivor. and yet - the surroundings are definitely meant to inspire an emotional response, even to non new-yorkers. new york is a microcosm to the world, after all, the corroded melting pot. and this situation, eyeballed by this character - the extraordinary translated by the mediocre - is made all the more haunting for it.
now i understand the whitehead hype.
aside: i was actually in tribeca on tuesday, where the action of this novel takes place, and i could not help superimposing the narrative upon the scenery - the nearness to halloween didn't hurt matters. but yeah, a terrible part of town to try to withstand a zombie apocalypse. and, to ceridwen, i understand your bristling at the midwest barb - there was a little one for queens, too. why i oughtta!
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Zone One.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-42 of 42) (42 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Courtney
(new)
-
added it
Oct 25, 2011 09:29am
zone one will always be the safe haven for me. lol.
reply
|
flag
*
hahah i know!! that part cracked me up - so many different adjectives for poor poor "everyone has a pony" connecticut. but seriously - i read this review when you first wrote it, and then after i read the book, i reread it and my mind was blown. it is perfect. you are such a good reviewer i wanna smack you a little. smack!
I smack you back! Smack!I was surprised by how much humor was in all the fancy sentences. Sometimes writing with semicolons thinks nothing is funny.
yeah, he is definitely wry. and mournful. there is so much emotional depth through this very analytical filter. it sickens me how good he is. smack!incidentally, to all, the portion of the floor i rule with an iron fist at my job is also called "zone one." we have a much more controlled zombie situation.
karen wrote: "yeah, he is definitely wry. and mournful. there is so much emotional depth through this very analytical filter. it sickens me how good he is. smack!incidentally, to all, the portion of the floor ..."
corporate zombies?
i feel so guilty because i want to like this so so much because i like colson so so much. but i just keep falling asleep when i try to dig in. boooooo.
The other nice thing about Colson is that he is very, very cute. Look how awkward!
He could use a hug!
Observe him eating a sandwich!

Writers are just like you!
(P.S. The above post was going to be my review for Zone One before I read it, but then the book deserved better then my goofing off.)
Grrr8 review, I started this yesterday and was having similar thoughts about his sentences, though I think of them as more polished than dense. Certainly they are to be savored in any case. The book is absolutely great so far.
well, not dense like duhhhh, but they are more than polished, to me. there are just so very many words. it is more than that the words are well-chosen and elegant. there are also a ton of them. let me know when you review.
If you want real density, pick up that copy of Going Native I know you bought. Now those are some packed sentences.
oof, not until the paper is finished. i am only going to read brisk mostly-YA until then. there is no time for density.
Definitely on my list. The only book I have read by CW was The Colossus of New York, a long time ago. I was blown away. It looks like it is time to get blown away again. Thanks for the reminder and wonderful review.
You had me at "even though they are only a subjunctive character in a three-sentence authorial daydream." Another great review.
karen wrote: "thank you! i felt i had to rescue this book from the silliness of others."hah hah. I already "liked" this way back when, but saw your comment and had to post. I tend to trust your taste about zzzzoombbbieesss so I'm definitely going to read it.
the zombies are more implicit than threatening, but it is a really well-written book if you don't need explosions and blood spurting everywhere to hold your interest.
oh. yeah. i took some pictures for it, then i deflated and i have not yet recovered.here are your options - i can do it saturday before work, or i can add it to this week's. and i still have to mail your present, because i suck.
No, do it today please. Saturday is far away. I have my binoculars out and I still can't see Saturday from here.(Did you get my wonderful Xmas card???)
oh, baby, i can't tonight. i am still at work and after work i have academic obligations. the earliest i can do is friday night.
Karen you're review is giving me room for a read of this novel, what I want to know is that many readers are having problems with this story why what do you think readers are not liking?
well, 1) people who go into it thinking it is going to be a typical zombie novel are going to be disappointed. because it is not. 2) there is a detachment to the prose that some people may find off-putting. but that is one of its strengths, to me. it is at once very clinical and just gorgeous. there are some authors who do the clinical thing and drain the novel of all its life, but here, the detachment does not affect the beauty of the prose at all. and that is a fascinating accomplishment, to me. how did whitehead manage that?
karen wrote: "well, 1) people who go into it thinking it is going to be a typical zombie novel are going to be disappointed. because it is not. 2) there is a detachment to the prose that some people may find off..."Thank you very much I will let the story speak for itself and give it a read.
karen wrote: "well, 1) people who go into it thinking it is going to be a typical zombie novel are going to be disappointed. because it is not. 2) there is a detachment to the prose that some people may find off..."Clinical beauty is where it's at.



