<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="22444853">
    <user id="1066637">
    <name><![CDATA[Andrew]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[New York, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1066637-andrew]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="poetry" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon May 26 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat May 17 13:53:16 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu May 29 06:24:31 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Split into two main sections, Meter and Form (per the title). The meter section was useful, but, as another reviewer here has stated, suffers from a glut of examples.  It drags on a bit.<br/>I found the form section the better of the two: discussions of line, rhyme, stanza, and a selection of standard forms, such as the sonnet (of course).]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22444853]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>