Kat Kennedy's Reviews > The Treachery of Beautiful Things
The Treachery of Beautiful Things
by Ruth Frances Long (Goodreads Author)
by Ruth Frances Long (Goodreads Author)
Kat Kennedy's review
bookshelves: kat-s-book-reviews, fun-fantasy, to-ya-or-not-to-ya, the-great-shelf-of-meh, urban-fantasy-woot, ya-pnr-maddness
Apr 29, 12
bookshelves: kat-s-book-reviews, fun-fantasy, to-ya-or-not-to-ya, the-great-shelf-of-meh, urban-fantasy-woot, ya-pnr-maddness
Read from March 09 to April 28, 2012
For me, sometimes I rate a book because, objectively, it's just a really bad book with limited literary quality. This is not an objective rating and I need to reinforce that before we continue. It is a subjective reflection on my personal reading experience.
Because the first half of the book, that I read, wasn't necessarily a poorly written book. If you like fairy fantasy then you will probably enjoy it. I, for one, enjoy fairies - but not this kind of fairy story, and it's not the author's fault.
Long is trying to get back to somewhat old school fairy tale tellings, and in doing so, has returned to many of the themes intrinsic to the fairy mythos - which is moral, physical and spiritual purity of the human which is tested when pitied into the fairy realm where temptations and defilers lurk around every corner.
Don't eat their food, don't dance with them (cause you know what dancing leads to...) don't corrupt yourself by lying with the fairy king. The counter balance to that is that through love, moral goodness (restraint for evil temptations) and by having a pure heart - you can triumph over the wicked, corrupt fae.
All a lovely story if that's your thing, but it isn't mine. I don't do distressed damsels at risk of having their virginity frisked and proving to all that their mighty heart can not be conquered by evil because she's just so GOOD and PURE. Look at her rescue that baby! Look how vulnerable she is one minute but protecting innocent children the next!
It really is my fault. I should have paid more attention to the cover. I mean, take a good look at that thing for a second.

I mean, look at it! She's wearing a white fru-fru dress while walking through a forest, clutching blooming flowers to her lower body and looking flustered and scared. I couldn't have picked a better way of depicting maidenhood if I'd taped a real hymen to the front cover. I need to learn to pay attention!
Just about everything that happens to our protagonist, from the moment she steps into fairy, is a sex metaphor she must escape from. And if that kind of repressed expression of female sexuality speaks to you then please try this book. But at the point in which a handsome man kisses her and she LOSES HER SOUL, and Oberon shows up as one of the big antagonists promising to deflower her because she's just so pure and good - well, that's the point at which my upchuck reflex goes into overdrive and I mentally check out.
At least I now know why Steph and I have no soul. It's all that dirty, dirty sex and alcohol and bad food and filthy dancing and lack of any kind of repression. And I really wouldn't personally have it any other way.
This review can be found on our blog at Cuddlebuggery.
*Thanks to the publishers who provided this ARC to me through Netgalley.
Because the first half of the book, that I read, wasn't necessarily a poorly written book. If you like fairy fantasy then you will probably enjoy it. I, for one, enjoy fairies - but not this kind of fairy story, and it's not the author's fault.
Long is trying to get back to somewhat old school fairy tale tellings, and in doing so, has returned to many of the themes intrinsic to the fairy mythos - which is moral, physical and spiritual purity of the human which is tested when pitied into the fairy realm where temptations and defilers lurk around every corner.
Don't eat their food, don't dance with them (cause you know what dancing leads to...) don't corrupt yourself by lying with the fairy king. The counter balance to that is that through love, moral goodness (restraint for evil temptations) and by having a pure heart - you can triumph over the wicked, corrupt fae.
All a lovely story if that's your thing, but it isn't mine. I don't do distressed damsels at risk of having their virginity frisked and proving to all that their mighty heart can not be conquered by evil because she's just so GOOD and PURE. Look at her rescue that baby! Look how vulnerable she is one minute but protecting innocent children the next!
It really is my fault. I should have paid more attention to the cover. I mean, take a good look at that thing for a second.

I mean, look at it! She's wearing a white fru-fru dress while walking through a forest, clutching blooming flowers to her lower body and looking flustered and scared. I couldn't have picked a better way of depicting maidenhood if I'd taped a real hymen to the front cover. I need to learn to pay attention!
Just about everything that happens to our protagonist, from the moment she steps into fairy, is a sex metaphor she must escape from. And if that kind of repressed expression of female sexuality speaks to you then please try this book. But at the point in which a handsome man kisses her and she LOSES HER SOUL, and Oberon shows up as one of the big antagonists promising to deflower her because she's just so pure and good - well, that's the point at which my upchuck reflex goes into overdrive and I mentally check out.
At least I now know why Steph and I have no soul. It's all that dirty, dirty sex and alcohol and bad food and filthy dancing and lack of any kind of repression. And I really wouldn't personally have it any other way.
This review can be found on our blog at Cuddlebuggery.
*Thanks to the publishers who provided this ARC to me through Netgalley.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Treachery of Beautiful Things.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 04/28/2012 | page 195 |
|
51.0% | "Finally really making some headway on this one." 2 comments |
Comments (showing 1-40 of 40) (40 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Ebony
(new)
Mar 15, 2012 09:30pm
This sounds awesome.
reply
|
flag
*
Things keep getting in the way. Other books I HAVE to read in a time frame, blog content to write, reviews etc.
It's not a bad book, I don't think. But it's just not for me. Please tell me a time comes when she's not so damsel-y in distress all the time?
No it's not, that's why I liked it. Apart from Moning and Kagawa's series(I don't think it's OK to put these two in the same sentence, but anyway)I don't like fairies much, so I was very sceptical about Treacherous. But it's very dark and mysterious and the protagon. was cool. I don't know, I guess I was in the mood for a fairy tale at the time :)
No that's cool. I'm just half way and she keeps getting rescued all the time. I have a feeling that might continue until she discovers her true inner power whilst either dealing with Tatiana or Oberon so I've just lost interest.
Yeah, I completely understand.After a lot of paranormal YAs I wanted a fantasy-like one and I read this so I guess it was a pleasant surprise and break.
"taped a real hymen to the front cover"This is why your cover design career went nowhere, Kat. Nobody can tell it's a hymen out of context like that. Also: messy.
Rachel wrote: ""taped a real hymen to the front cover"This is why your cover design career went nowhere, Kat. Nobody can tell it's a hymen out of context like that. Also: messy."
LOL
Still the best line of the review.
I just have to say that I love your reviews. Every. Single. One. But this one instantly jumped to the top of the list when you contemplated taping a hymen to the cover of a book. I'm off, now, to find one that you've reviewed that has dirty, dirty sex (or at least the tension) and lots of bad food and dancing and absolutely no repression... /sigh
Rachel, well that explains it! I was wondering why! Enjoy Ashleigh, I'm going to assume you've read the Fever series so I won't bother recommending it to you.
Trying to get the mental image of a row of hymen-covered books on the new arrivals shelf out of my head. Methinks that might fit in better in the horror section. Sounds like thinly veiled, sexist drivel. I can't stand the oh woe is me, oops I twisted my ankle again female lead. Guess this one stays off my list.
I missed the hymen metaphor of the cover because I was too busy trying to work out what happened to the rest of that poor girl's body. Her proportions are seriously odd.
Oh, this is unfortunate. I've been really looking forward to this one, but if the protag is a complete damsel in distress I'll totally hate it.
She's not a complete damsel in distress - at least not where babies are concerned. But she was often enough to make me check out.
As someone pointed out there's another book with pretty much the same cover. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11...
Funny review Kat. Seriously the Hymen part? If I ever decide to put a hymen on one of my covers I'm going to send you an advanced copy.
Kate wrote: "Can anyone tell me, btw, why she seems to have no feet? Can she turn herself invisible?"I'm guessing that, in the original photo, her feet had disappeared under her dress and were partly shadowed by all the tulle.
But in the case of this book, it looks like the editing to add the flowers there at the bottom of the photo was done quite clumsily. If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say that's why they slapped the title there -- to "hide" the bad blending work.
Elizabeth wrote: "I'm guessing that, in the original photo, her feet had disappeared under her dress and were p..."Elizabeth, that makes total sense. My sister (a graphic designer, who does all my covers, incidentally) probably would have guessed that right away. Sadly, I have no skillz in that area, except to take the bags out from under my eyes. hahaha
I saw that other book's image, which also has a faded bottom, and I'm going to guess that there was a problem with the bottom of the dress for some reason. maybe she was standing in something?
Kate wrote: "I saw that other book's image, which also has a faded bottom, and I'm going to guess that there was a problem with the bottom of the dress for some reason. maybe she was standing in something?"That's entirely possible!
I've also worked with a lot of large poofy dresses for photography (I adore them like crazy! :D), and just depending on where they cut off, the fabric naturally shadows feet enough for them to look like they're missing entirely. That's why I usually prefer an under-dress that's a little longer, unless I'm going for that "floating" look.
Elizabeth wrote: "Kate wrote: "I saw that other book's image, which also has a faded bottom, and I'm going to guess that there was a problem with the bottom of the dress for some reason. maybe she was standing in so..."OMG, this is the perfect opportunity for me to tell you that I've totally been stalking your photography site and your pics are GORGEOUS!(hmmm... on second thought that sounds a little crazypants. I haven't been stalking you. Just glancing. Casually. Every so often.) If your book is anything like your photos, I look forward to reading it.
I didn't think that this book came out for awhile yet? It's on my wish-list on amazon.. I distinctly remember it not being available yet..??
Elizabeth wrote: "Ooh, thank you so much! That's very kind of you. :D"Hmmm... how to say this without gushing... I don't have to be kind, because you're clearly very talented. :) Obviously, that just my OPINION, but I'm awesome, so what I say counts more. (of course, that is my opinion, too.)







