Sera's Reviews > The Age of Innocence
The Age of Innocence
by Edith Wharton, Maureen Howard
by Edith Wharton, Maureen Howard
Sera's review
bookshelves: classics, favorites, own, 1001-books, literary-fiction
Aug 15, 08
bookshelves: classics, favorites, own, 1001-books, literary-fiction
Recommended to Sera by:
Dini
Read in August, 2008
** spoiler alert **
I forgot how much I love to read Edith Wharton. She can capture the mood of a specific point in time perfectly through both the actions and thoughts of the characters and the setting. I felt so much emotion as I read the book, because I felt the feelings of the primary players in the story. May's innocence, but underlying determination to keep her man. Archer's boredom with NY high society, and Ellen's quest for peace and freedom to be herself without fear of reprisal or rejection.
I found the story to be slow-moving at times, which initially led me to give this book 4 stars, but I changed it to 5, because I like to think that Wharton did it intentionally to once again evoke the feeling in the reader of what it was like to live in this small circle of formality and decorum, eagerly waiting for something to happen. Leave it to the women for having more sense, too, than Archer who is willing to sacrifice everything for a woman that I'm not sure that he really loved. I think that he was more in love with the idea of Ellen, what she represented, her willingness to speak openly about matters and her way of standing out in the group through her fashion, hairstyles and the way in which she decorated her home.
I was a tad bit disappointed by the ending, but then what would I expect in its place? The fact that Archer walks away from what is likely to be his final opportunity to see Ellen supported my feeling that he wasn't in love with her. The time for her filling his void for a different life had passed so what would be the point of their getting together? And, would it really be worth stirring up old emotions 30 years after the fact? Again, for what? Yes, I agree with Ms. Wharton that Archer should leave well enough alone, because there was nothing to be gained at that point.
It is unlikely that I would re-read this book again, but I am so glad to have experienced it.
I found the story to be slow-moving at times, which initially led me to give this book 4 stars, but I changed it to 5, because I like to think that Wharton did it intentionally to once again evoke the feeling in the reader of what it was like to live in this small circle of formality and decorum, eagerly waiting for something to happen. Leave it to the women for having more sense, too, than Archer who is willing to sacrifice everything for a woman that I'm not sure that he really loved. I think that he was more in love with the idea of Ellen, what she represented, her willingness to speak openly about matters and her way of standing out in the group through her fashion, hairstyles and the way in which she decorated her home.
I was a tad bit disappointed by the ending, but then what would I expect in its place? The fact that Archer walks away from what is likely to be his final opportunity to see Ellen supported my feeling that he wasn't in love with her. The time for her filling his void for a different life had passed so what would be the point of their getting together? And, would it really be worth stirring up old emotions 30 years after the fact? Again, for what? Yes, I agree with Ms. Wharton that Archer should leave well enough alone, because there was nothing to be gained at that point.
It is unlikely that I would re-read this book again, but I am so glad to have experienced it.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Age of Innocence.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-7 of 7) (7 new)
date
newest »
newest »
Thanks, Sarah. I have no idea as to whether it's accurate, but the thought fit in with all the other feelings that I experienced when I read this book.
Leave it to the women for having more sense, too, than Archer who is willing to sacrifice everything for a woman that I'm not sure that he really loved.I so agree. I think the women are the best part of the whole story. The nuances in their characters were so intriguing. You started out thinking they were each cookie cutter stereotypes and were left knowing they had many more layers. I thought the complexity of their personalities made it more true to life.
Meghan, that's one thing that is so funny about the book. Archer's view of May is a cookie-cutter one, and he even though he sees glimpses of another more complex side of her, he refuses to believe that they are an actual part of her. I believe that his view of both May and Ellen are more about what he wanted to see rather than what was actually there.



Very interesting. I never thought of it that way.