Jodie's Reviews > The Leftovers
The Leftovers
by Tom Perrotta
by Tom Perrotta
** spoiler alert **
What a massive premise to try and pull off. A rapture like event, where millions of people all over the planet simply evaporate. It can't be the rapture though, at least not the skewed Christian version of it, because a lot of Christians are left behind - devastated that their version of God has forsaken them, and a lot of people from varying faiths, including atheists and a few random celebrities have gone. There are some good character ideas in this book. I really liked how the minister loses the plot and starts dirt files on all the locals who departed, trying to ascertain in his own mind why has he sacrificed his life to serve a God that has left him behind? That was great, but there wasn't enough of it.
One story line just left me furious at the end, and that was the story of Laurie. Laurie is a mum, married to Kevin and they have two children. No-one from her immediate family departs, only the daughter of her best friend does. So sort of in sympathy to her friend, whom she has helped grieve (maybe wallow is a better word) in the loss of her daughter they join the local cult. Lots and lots of cults have popped up all over the planet, I can realistically see something like that happening. I mean there would be a lot of questions floating around after an event like that. So her friend joins the cult and then without any explanation at all, not even a sentence devoted to it, Laurie does the same thing too. It is like the author leaves the big question unanswered (where did all these people go?), so he has a licence to leave a whole raft of other important questions and developments unanswered. It just strikes me as wrong, most people actually would not do what Laurie (a caring mum) does.
There are some positive elements in the book. I really enjoyed reading about Nora, her reactions and actions, did strike me as real, as did most of the things Tom and Jill do (Lauries children). Meh, seems as good a word as any to describe how I feel about it.
One story line just left me furious at the end, and that was the story of Laurie. Laurie is a mum, married to Kevin and they have two children. No-one from her immediate family departs, only the daughter of her best friend does. So sort of in sympathy to her friend, whom she has helped grieve (maybe wallow is a better word) in the loss of her daughter they join the local cult. Lots and lots of cults have popped up all over the planet, I can realistically see something like that happening. I mean there would be a lot of questions floating around after an event like that. So her friend joins the cult and then without any explanation at all, not even a sentence devoted to it, Laurie does the same thing too. It is like the author leaves the big question unanswered (where did all these people go?), so he has a licence to leave a whole raft of other important questions and developments unanswered. It just strikes me as wrong, most people actually would not do what Laurie (a caring mum) does.
There are some positive elements in the book. I really enjoyed reading about Nora, her reactions and actions, did strike me as real, as did most of the things Tom and Jill do (Lauries children). Meh, seems as good a word as any to describe how I feel about it.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Leftovers.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-9 of 9) (9 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Julie
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Mar 01, 2012 02:36pm
I couldn't agree more about Laurie. I tried to understand. I couldn't. She was utterly irresponsible and eventually downright crazy—which was hard to reconcile with the way she was described in the book's introduction. However, she surely represents one type of reaction that I think wouldn't be terribly rare. (But in her particular case, I kept asking WHY???)
reply
|
flag
*
Maybe Laurie is illustrating in her actions the craziness that many characters in the book felt? I had no sympathy for her whatsoever, though. How could she leave her children and all that.
I just don't think it was set up that way for it to be feasible for Laurie. Absolutely I agree with you that some people would go crazy, but what Laurie did, just didn't fit inside of her story for me.
I agree with you completely. The thing I will add, it was a great concept but it was very difficult for me to respect or feel for the characters. I just though most everyone in the book were selfish and had this "poor me" mentality. Ill give the author this though, he developed them well enough for me to dislike the majority.
I thought the author made it really clear why Laurie had made the decision; she specifically says she couldn't go on living like the end of the world hadn't happened. The groundwork for that was laid early in the book, where in her chapters Laurie describes how the Event had shaken her atheism to the core, and she just couldn't NOT believe anymore but had no idea what to believe in.
