Jehan's Reviews > The Rebels of Ireland

The Rebels of Ireland by Edward Rutherfurd

by
138407
's review
Jul 17, 07


When I turned the last page of Rutherford's The Princes of Ireland and saw the advertisement for the sequel, I ran out and bought it the next day, excited for what was to come next. I was not disappointed. This sweeping novel brought the history of Ireland into the present, told through the interconnected lives of everyday people.

What I love about Rutherford is that he tells his stories from so many perspectives; for instance, instead of the typical take on the Easter Rising of 1916 and the War of Independence and Civil War that followed, we are given the women's story - what their role was in the conflict and how it affected their family and their home. With him, you get not only an understanding of the greater events that were occurring at the time with a blind reference to 'the people,' but an intimate telling of how those in power affect the day-to-day lives of those same people.

The novel is no doubt long, just like the first, and at times it feels like it may not end, but as you read the final chapters, you realize that so much work has brought you here to culminate in a fantastic conclusion.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Rebels of Ireland.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Robyn (new)

Robyn is it legitimate history as well?




message 2: by Jehan (last edited Jul 18, 2007 09:03am) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Jehan Yeah, he's actually done extraordinary research to not only set the story against historical events, but also to include the everyday details of life during each of the periods he writes about, but with extreme accuracy. I think this was the part I enjoyed most out of both his novels, the small things that create the atmosphere of the day.

I actually went back and verified things while I was reading, just to double check, and each time, he was right on.

One thing, however, the history, although accurate, is purely one-sided. I understand it would be near impossible to include a fair analysis of each side of each conflict (although he does provide a good amount of background . . . and it still is a novel), but it doesn't allow for alternative view points.


back to top