Riku Sayuj's Reviews > Chaos: Making a New Science
Chaos: Making a New Science
by James Gleick
by James Gleick
Riku Sayuj's review
bookshelves: reviews, favorites
Dec 25, 12
bookshelves: reviews, favorites
Read from January 15 to February 12, 2012 — I own a copy
Chaos: The Tip of a Giant Iceberg
Gleick only gives an introduction about the actual science and beauty of Chaos. Instead he focusses on giving a poetic account of the scientists who first stumbled on it and their great surprise and the struggles form the narrative crux of the book.
While some may say this makes it a less informative book, for me this made it one of the most intriguing non-fiction books I have read. Gleick's way of telling the stories makes the reader share in the wonder and incredulity of each pioneer as he stumbled upon this hitherto unguessed truth of nature. Each stumbling step, each misguided attempt and every remonstration expected in such a new endeavor is traced out in loving detail and these scientists come alive as insecure dramers daring to step beyond the realms of the possible. Gleick makes heroes out of Mandelbrot Benoît and the others and weaves an otherworldly charm around their ideas. This made the book pure poetry for me.
The amazing pictures and illustrations and the quotes accompanying each chapter all add to the feeling of reading an art text book rather than a science book. And this ultimately was the real achievement of Gleick in writing Chaos - He manages to convey to us that this is the first foray of science into the realm of art - not just of explaining art but of being art.
But ultimately none of this is going to be the lasting impact of this book. The reading pleasure and the hero worship of these daredevils is transient after all. For me, the real impact is that it has changed the way I look at the ordinary everyday world - the leaves, the trees, the pebbles, the pattern on the peels of an orange - everything is strangely magnified and beautiful now. I see the poetry of constant motion and evolution everywhere and I can feel the science of Chaos intuitively as I take my long walks. I can see Strange Attractors and Fractals and unstable equilibriums in the most mundane places. And this is the greatest gift of the book.
PS. Don't miss out on the exhaustive endnotes. They are indispensable.
Gleick only gives an introduction about the actual science and beauty of Chaos. Instead he focusses on giving a poetic account of the scientists who first stumbled on it and their great surprise and the struggles form the narrative crux of the book.
While some may say this makes it a less informative book, for me this made it one of the most intriguing non-fiction books I have read. Gleick's way of telling the stories makes the reader share in the wonder and incredulity of each pioneer as he stumbled upon this hitherto unguessed truth of nature. Each stumbling step, each misguided attempt and every remonstration expected in such a new endeavor is traced out in loving detail and these scientists come alive as insecure dramers daring to step beyond the realms of the possible. Gleick makes heroes out of Mandelbrot Benoît and the others and weaves an otherworldly charm around their ideas. This made the book pure poetry for me.
The amazing pictures and illustrations and the quotes accompanying each chapter all add to the feeling of reading an art text book rather than a science book. And this ultimately was the real achievement of Gleick in writing Chaos - He manages to convey to us that this is the first foray of science into the realm of art - not just of explaining art but of being art.
But ultimately none of this is going to be the lasting impact of this book. The reading pleasure and the hero worship of these daredevils is transient after all. For me, the real impact is that it has changed the way I look at the ordinary everyday world - the leaves, the trees, the pebbles, the pattern on the peels of an orange - everything is strangely magnified and beautiful now. I see the poetry of constant motion and evolution everywhere and I can feel the science of Chaos intuitively as I take my long walks. I can see Strange Attractors and Fractals and unstable equilibriums in the most mundane places. And this is the greatest gift of the book.
PS. Don't miss out on the exhaustive endnotes. They are indispensable.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Chaos.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 02/09/2012 | page 42 |
|
11.0% | "Gleick is a poet I say!" |
| 02/09/2012 | page 45 |
|
12.0% | "This is a prose poem and not science. Gleick is a poet I say!" |
| 02/09/2012 | page 47 |
|
12.0% | "This is a prose poem and not science. Truly Gleick is a poet I say!" |
| 02/11/2012 | page 250 |
|
65.0% | "Throughly deserves all the acclaim heaped on it over the years. This is how a science book should be written." |
Comments (showing 1-12 of 12) (12 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
William
(new)
26 de Dic 03:48
Is it loaded with mathematical equations?
reply
|
flag
*
Riku wrote: "William wrote: "Is it loaded with mathematical equations?"Almost spotless in that regard."
AH, now I'm interested. Thanks for your stellar review!
I'm glad you reminded me of this one, Riku. It had been high on my unofficial list at one time, but it never bubbled all the way to the top. Your excellent review may get it there yet. Thanks!
I had the great privilege of managing a research institute fr almost 15 years, and I never ceased being fascinated by the scientific process of hypothesis and experimentation. Thanks for an excellent review.
Lewis wrote: "I had the great privilege of managing a research institute fr almost 15 years, and I never ceased being fascinated by the scientific process of hypothesis and experimentation. Thanks for an excelle..."Maybe, it is the closest we come to Romanticism now.
Steve wrote: "I'm glad you reminded me of this one, Riku. It had been high on my unofficial list at one time, but it never bubbled all the way to the top. Your excellent review may get it there yet. Thanks!"Well, did it? :)
I agree with your Review Riku. It has an element of adventure to it; a story of the discovery of the maths and science more than an explanation of the things themselves. It bears up to being reread
Riku wrote: "Well, did it? :)"The path to the top of the list appears to be following a fractal pattern. :-)
Steve wrote: "Riku wrote: "Well, did it? :)"The path to the top of the list appears to be following a fractal pattern. :-)"
That could be taken to mean 'never-ending'. ;)
