Eric's Reviews > Starship Troopers
Starship Troopers
by Robert A. Heinlein
by Robert A. Heinlein
Eric's review
bookshelves: science-fiction, classic
Mar 21, 13
bookshelves: science-fiction, classic
Recommended for:
A must for sci-fi fans
Read from May 01 to 02, 2012, read count: Once
I had been meaning to read this for a while, and am glad I finally got around to it. I have a bunch of unrelated thoughts, which I'll just list below in no particular order of importance.
- I'm sure I am not the first to note this, but Starship Troopers is nothing like the '90s movie that shares its name -- not in plot, tone, or any other respect, other than a few of the main characters' names being left unchanged. The book is far, far superior.
- This book was very far ahead of its time, in terms of sci-fi ideas, with the M.I.'s mechanized suits and the ships' Cherenkov drives (FTL/hyperspeed/warp drives); gender roles, as women were starship pilots in the Terran Navy; and racial diversity, with the cast being extremely multi-racial for 1959 when it was written.
- I was almost turned off from reading Starship Troopers when I heard it called "military propaganda," but found the arguments for the military to be fairly balanced. While the slant is obviously pro-military -- the main character did choose to join up, after all -- the military is never glorified. There are scenes of corporal punishment, arguments and frustrations with military decision makers, a number of violent and unnecessary deaths, and grizzled veterans with numerous missing limbs. Their cause is never made out to be righteous, either. The entire military system is also set up as volunteer-only, with no penalties for dropping out at any time, separating it from the dark days of Vietnam-era America.
- This quote from Rico's History and Moral Philosophy teacher, written over 50 years ago, sums up more or less everything that is wrong with our society now:
- I'm sure I am not the first to note this, but Starship Troopers is nothing like the '90s movie that shares its name -- not in plot, tone, or any other respect, other than a few of the main characters' names being left unchanged. The book is far, far superior.
- This book was very far ahead of its time, in terms of sci-fi ideas, with the M.I.'s mechanized suits and the ships' Cherenkov drives (FTL/hyperspeed/warp drives); gender roles, as women were starship pilots in the Terran Navy; and racial diversity, with the cast being extremely multi-racial for 1959 when it was written.
- I was almost turned off from reading Starship Troopers when I heard it called "military propaganda," but found the arguments for the military to be fairly balanced. While the slant is obviously pro-military -- the main character did choose to join up, after all -- the military is never glorified. There are scenes of corporal punishment, arguments and frustrations with military decision makers, a number of violent and unnecessary deaths, and grizzled veterans with numerous missing limbs. Their cause is never made out to be righteous, either. The entire military system is also set up as volunteer-only, with no penalties for dropping out at any time, separating it from the dark days of Vietnam-era America.
- This quote from Rico's History and Moral Philosophy teacher, written over 50 years ago, sums up more or less everything that is wrong with our society now:
There is an old song which asserts 'the best things in life are free.' Not true! Utterly false! This was the tragic fallacy which brought on the decadence and collapse of the democracies of the twentieth century; those noble experiments failed because the people had been led to believe that they could simply vote for whatever they wanted... and get it, without toil, without sweat, without tears.All in all, this is not only a classic, prototypical sci-fi novel, it is also an interesting look at military organization and the philosophy of social responsibility and duty. A must-read for fans of those genres.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Starship Troopers.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-5 of 5) (5 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Robert
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
May 03, 2012 02:55pm
I strongly suspect that the film is a deliberate satire of the book.
reply
|
flag
*
According to Wikipedia, they had already started making the film before they optioned the movie, and the director never even finished writing the novel:"A report in an American Cinematographer article states that the Heinlein novel was optioned well into the pre-production period of the film, which had a working title of Bug Hunt at Outpost Nine; most of the writing team reportedly were unaware of the novel at the time. According to the DVD commentary, Paul Verhoeven never finished reading the novel, claiming he read through the first few chapters and became both 'bored and depressed.'"

