Giselle's Reviews > Raw Blue

Raw Blue by Kirsty Eagar

by
4800103
's review
Aug 26, 11

bookshelves: ebook, contemporary
Read from August 24 to 25, 2011

3.5 stars
Well apparently I'm the only one in the world who didn't absolutely love this book. It's not bad by any means. I still genuinely enjoyed it, I just didn't completely fall in love with it.

Raw Blue is a deep and dark story about a girl who went through a traumatic ordeal and she's taken up surfing as an outlet to take her mind off of it all and, in a way, punishing herself for having been a victim. Like the title says, this is a raw story. It's dark. It's deeply impassioned and very fragile. Though it never becomes overwhelming; you can feel Carly's anguish throughout the whole story, but it's more than pointless teenage angst, it just feels true. You feel sympathetic and not just towards her, but the side characters as well. They all give Carly reason and esteem to help her move forward.

The protagonist, Carly, has a very strong voice in this story. She hides behind surfing and cooking, just trying to hold everything together. I loved how real she was. She wasn't reckless or superficial, she just was. I loved her way with people and her thought process throughout the story. She's anti-social but she still cares very deeply for the few people she lets in her life - even if she doesn't realize it.

Ryan, the love interest, is also perfect because he's so imperfect. He's got flaws. He's a human being. Not a perfect guy with a perfect life. How refreshing! I also like the way he spoke. It was very Australian-ey (or so I'm presuming anyways).

I did however have a hard time with the surf speak and local slang. I know next to zero in the subject of surfing. I live in Canada - says it all. So all the parts when she was in the water pretty much all went over my head. The story was not affected by it though. Surfing is a big part of the book, yes, but those parts were still not relevant except for demonstrating how surfing is a way of life for some people; An escape; A craving. There was some non-surf jargon that was also new to me, though I found it more endearing than troublesome. It gave it Australian charm.

When I went into this I was expecting a lighter read. A romance of some sort. Not really chick-lit but definitely not this deep. I think it's the main reason I didn't love it. I wasn't prepared and I kept waiting for the story to progress. But overall, this book definitely is a great work and Kirsty is amazing with words. If you haven't, I suggest you give it a try.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Raw Blue.
sign in »

Reading Progress

08/25/2011
36.0% "2 questions: what is a crow? And Marty ofen says 'nah' randomly. Here Nah means No, but he seems to use it like I'd use "umm". Is this australian slang?"

Comments (showing 1-15 of 15) (15 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Giselle (new) - rated it 3 stars

Giselle Ok I know Nothing about surfing - I live in Canada; We're lucky to even have thawed beaches for a few months. Hopefully I'll get it...


message 2: by Maja (new) - rated it 5 stars

Maja Neither do I, but I still loved it. Don't worry. :)


message 3: by ~Tina~ (new) - rated it 5 stars

~Tina~ lol @ living in Canada...I know what you mean. I wasn't prepared for the heavy topic either so I get where your coming from. I liked your review:)


message 4: by Giselle (new) - rated it 3 stars

Giselle ~Tina~ wrote: "lol @ living in Canada...I know what you mean. I wasn't prepared for the heavy topic either so I get where your coming from. I liked your review:)"

Thanks! I kind of wish we could surf down here now!


message 5: by Lisa O. (new) - rated it 5 stars

Lisa O. You make all valid points there Giselle, and it all depends on one's involvement in the story.
As I always say, I'm actually thankful that we have different opinions or it would be so boring :)


message 6: by Janina (new) - rated it 3 stars

Janina I am kind of glad to see more like-but-not-love reviews of this book here ... I already thought there was something wrong with me ;). I felt a bit out of the loop as it's so beautifully written and a type of novel I normally love.


message 7: by Giselle (new) - rated it 3 stars

Giselle I think if I picked up this book in the mood for a dark and emotional story I would have liked it more than I did. Probably. Oh well. Let's blame Maja.


message 8: by Maja (new) - rated it 5 stars

Maja Yey! Let's! But how did you not know, Giselle? I thought my review was pretty clear. Sense of powerlessness and detachment? :)

Ah, well, we'll do better next time. :)


message 9: by Giselle (new) - rated it 3 stars

Giselle I did read your review before. But you say those are pleasant feelings and all. I guess I perceived it wrong or something. Haha it's ok though I still enjoyed the book and I'm happy I read it. A 3 star isn't "bad".


message 10: by Maja (new) - rated it 5 stars

Maja No it isn't. It's actually pretty good in my rating system.


message 11: by Giselle (new) - rated it 3 stars

Giselle My 3 stars are "good, but nothing special" but since this book is in fact a bit special is the reason it got a 3.5. Even if GR won't let me. Ha! I defy you GR!


message 12: by Janina (new) - rated it 3 stars

Janina Giselle wrote: "I think if I picked up this book in the mood for a dark and emotional story I would have liked it more than I did. Probably. Oh well. Let's blame Maja."

Lol. I have to admit that I probably have to blame my own expectations. They were miles high, it was hard for the book to keep up with that.

And I agree, three stars are still good. I go with what Goodreads says, so three stars mean I liked it.


message 13: by Giselle (last edited 26 de Ago 04:01) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Giselle Lol. I have to admit that I probably have to blame my own expectations. They were miles high, it was hard for the book to keep up with that.

This would have played a part for me too. Everyone was praising the book saying it was the best thing since chocolate.

I go with what Goodreads says, so three stars mean I liked it.

I follow it too, I just elaborate the definition on my profile so I can ask myself which star it falls under. I'm so indecisive when it comes to ratings. :(


Lyn (The Heartless) Is it just me, or do you feel that certain big details are just missing? For example, I just read where a guy whistled and cut off Carly. She said "the guy", but I feel like it was randomly thrown in. I constantly feel that I am missing chunks of action or dialog.


message 15: by Giselle (new) - rated it 3 stars

Giselle I have read this so long ago I don't quite remember much of it.


back to top