Brad's Reviews > Hamlet

Hamlet by William Shakespeare

by
1022982
's review
Jan 19, 11

bookshelves: classic, shakespeare, played-a-part
Read in October, 2009, read count: 20

Is there a better artistic expression of death's myriad manifestations than Shakespeare's Hamlet? I say no. In my counter-factual universe I see William Shakespeare as a Lieutenant at the First Somme. Imagine the war poetry that Shakespeare could have written. Perhaps one such war sonnet would have gone something like this:

My subaltern’s eyes will ne’er again see the sun,
Exposed hearts are more red than whores lips are red;
If we go o’er the top we are sure to face the gun;
And those caught on wires are things better off dead.

I have seen bodies gouged open, red and white,
And from froth-corrupted lungs seen gas leak;
The scent of naturally rotting flesh gives more delight
Than the breath of vesicant that from blisters reeks.

I loathe the whine of 5-9s we needs all must know
Dying screams hath a far more pleasing sound;
I grant I ne’er saw an unworthy boy go;
My subaltern when he dies rots on the ground.

And yet, by heaven, I think my loss as rare
As all the missing and dead I blench to compare.

There is a scene in Act IV, rarely presented on-stage, wherein Hamlet looks upon Young Fortinbras' forces and feels guilt over his own concerns compared with the concerns of the men who go to die: "...to my shame I see / The immanent death of twenty thousand men / That for a fantasy and a trick of fame / Go to their graves like beds..." (IV.iv.59-62). Dulce Et Decorum Est Pro Patria Mori, indeed.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Hamlet.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-28 of 28) (28 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Stephen Brad, I voted for this review, because it is without doubt the oddest review of Hamlet I have ever read. Hands down. Interesting, too.


Brad My head's in a weird place today, Stephen.


Stephen I think it's awesome!


Stephen I still think it's awesome.


Joshua Nomen-Mutatio A fantastic play, probably my favorite Shakespeare, up there with King Lear. It's so easy to become jaded about things as massively well-regarded as Shakespeare. Every once in a while I remind myself that these things are so popular for very good reasons.


Lori (Hellian) Those 2 are indeed my favorites as well, along with R&J. But I digress, the reason I felt compelled to post is that there is a great article on Hamlet in this week's Newsweek. http://www.newsweek.com/id/216513


Stephen Now, my favorite Shakespeare, which annoys Brad no end, is Antony and Cleopatra. There is something about that train wreck of an affair that you can't look away from, it is so commanding of your attention.


message 8: by Logan (new)

Logan Stephen, I think you're on to something- Antony & Cleopatra is a drastically underrated piece of theatre. I love Billy Shake's tragedies, but for me the money is really in his histories. Both parts of Henry IV, as well as Henry V, have such a large piece of my heart. Flastaff may be the best unwittingly tragic character that Shakespeare ever created.


Brad My personal favourite is Julius Caesar (which is why I tease Stephen about Antony & Cleo...and he's exaggerating my "irritation"), but there are many excellent plays by the bard. I dig the histories, too, Logan. Thanks for the link, Lori, gonna have to go check it out.


Joshua Nomen-Mutatio Let's not neglect how funny he could be as well. Much Ado About Nothing and Twelfth Night are hilarious. I do like the tragedies best, but yeah, I mean, it's Shakespeare after all, so it's hard to find much that's worthy of totally trashing when one really gives some close attention to it.


Stephen I just think that Julius Caesar is over studied, over analyzed, and over praised. There is great humanity in Julius, but it's not the train wreck and Antony and Cleopatra is.

Ah, poof Falstaff. Coward, thief, comic, and yet, so very sympathetic in the end. It is almost heart breaking when Harry turns on him.


Stephen No trashing of Shakespeare here MFSO. We all love him.

Full fathom five thy father lies;
Of his bones are coral made;
Those are pearls that were his eyes;
Nothing of him that doth fade,
But doth suffer a sea-change
Into something rich and strange.
Sea-nymphs hourly ring his knell:
Ding-dong.
Hark! now I hear them — Ding-dong, bell


Joshua Nomen-Mutatio Not an accusation, just a general observation.


Stephen :-)


message 15: by Brad (new) - rated it 3 stars

Brad MyFleshSingsOut wrote: "Let's not neglect how funny he could be as well. Much Ado About Nothing and Twelfth Night are hilarious. I do like the tragedies best, but yeah, I mean, it's Shakespeare after all, so it's hard t..." Indeed. Even the basically stupid plays like A Comedy of Errors have much going for them and are entertaining as hell.

Stephen wrote: "I just think that Julius Caesar is over studied, over analyzed, and over praised..." It's funny because I would say the exact opposite. I've always thought that Caesar (and Antony and Cleopatra too) is understudied, underperformed, underanalyzed and underpraised. But then my judgment might be clouded by having played Antony and Brutus, which are big reasons for me to love Ceasar.






message 16: by Brad (new) - rated it 3 stars

Brad And trash Shakespeare all you want, MFSO. No one is above trashing ;)


Stephen Ah, Brad. Now this is fun.


message 18: by Dave (last edited Oct 10, 2009 04:20pm) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dave Russell You played both Antony and Brutus? Those must have been some quick changes. They have a couple of scenes together if I recall.


Stephen Has no one here played Cleopatra?


message 20: by Brad (new) - rated it 3 stars

Brad Dave wrote: "You played both Antony and Brutus? Those must have been some quick changes. They have a couple of scenes together if I recall."

Different productions. Brutus first then Antony. A cool way to play the parts.

I want to play Cleopatra, but I don't have the nose for it.




message 21: by Dave (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dave Russell Damn me and my hatred of emoticons. They might have helped my playful tone come through in message 18. Of course I knew they were different productions.


message 22: by Brad (new) - rated it 3 stars

Brad Oops. Sorry, Dave.


Stephen It certainly would have made Marc Antony and Brutus are talking a bit confusing.


message 24: by Dave (new) - rated it 4 stars

Dave Russell No problem. Your not familiar enough with my lame attempts at humor.


message 25: by Brad (new) - rated it 3 stars

Brad Unless I had been them both as puppets on opposing hands.


Stephen Brad, Brad, Brad, that wouldn't allow for much "acting," now would it? You'd have had to change the name to Soxious Tubulus Ceaser.


message 27: by Brad (new) - rated it 3 stars

Brad Don't let any serious puppeteers here you say that. There answer would be a most serious "you bet it would."


Stephen I ain't afeared no puppeteers. I got socks too.

On another note, were you aware that in the opera Madame Butterfly -- lovely work, but worked to death -- there is a non singing part for a child. the Metropolitan Opera decided to use a ...I forget what the Japanese puppets are called ... for the child, and it was a great success.


back to top