Gloria Mundi's Reviews > The Giver

The Giver by Lois Lowry
Rate this book
Clear rating

's review
Oct 07, 2011

it was ok
bookshelves: dystopia, children-s-books, ya-fiction, series-abandoned
Read from October 02 to 03, 2011

I've been on a dystopia roll recently, it seems. So here goes. This is supposed to be 1984 for children.

Jonas, the protagonist, is a 12 year old boy who lives in a world without war, pain, hunger, death, misery or, even, bad weather, where everyone is happy and has their place in society. Yet gradually a much more disquieting picture emerges of a world where all personal choice has been taken away, where every decision is made for the individual by the "state" (I have put state in quotation marks here because really we never find out exactly who makes these decisions and choices) and where nothing is private, not even your own dreams.

I am a firm believer that children's books have to be written the same as adult books, but better. I also think it is much harder to write good children's books, than it is to write for adults. And, ultimately, with children's literatiure, you have to satisfy both.

I'm afraid, for me, Lowry's book failed as both a children's book and as an adult book because her world just didn't make sense. And I do not accept, as a few goodreaders have stated in their reviews, that that's ok because it's a kid's book. I would have thought the opposite should be true. That it is especially important for the world that the author is creating to make sense, because it is a children's book.

This books does raise important questions about the price of happiness, freedom, responsibility and the importance of adversity but how can we expect kids to learn any of its lessons when there is no explanation of how such a society has arisen, barely any description of how it functions and lack of any sort of logic to the way it does.

The inability of the population to see in colour. How did that come about? Why is Jonas able to see it? There is a climate control system which ensures the sameness of the weather, yet there does not appear to be any physical barrier separating this world from the mysterious Elsewhere. The whole society seemed to be a series of loosely connected communes with a very strong cult flavour (brainwashing - tick, isolation - tick, control - tick) governed by a counsel but it is not clear how a counsel of so few is able to control and effectively govern all these people, particularly given the apparent extent of their involvement in the day-to day oversight and running of things like allocation of careers to 12 year olds.

I don't know what on earth was going on with the collective purge of all memory and its transfer to a single individual (through touch!!!). I found that whole aspect of the book ridiculous and unnecessary as the same could have been achieved by suppression of history and having Jonas and the Giver actually read some of those many books that are repeatedly mentioned but never even opened. I understand that sexual urges are suppressed by the pills but how do they manage to suppress love? It is in people's nature to become attached to and feel affection for other people and that would be inevitable in family units, even if unrelated by birth. The build up around "release" was another ridiculous aspect as it was patently obvious what it involved from pretty much the first time it is mentioned. It is unclear how this society with its severely restricted birth rate and commonplace release of anyone from petty rulebreakers to infants who don't sleep through the night is able to sustain itself or why such severe population control is necessary given there appear to be vast stretches of unoccupied land surrounding the community. I could go on and on.

I wish I could end this by saying, yes there were problems in the world building but the story and writing were fantastic. Yet I am not able to do that either. There was barely any story there at all. Most of the book concentrated on world-building with the plot only really taking off in the last few pages. The book felt far too short and rushed. The characters were flat and indistinguishable (the fact that Jonas' little sister Lily seemed to talk in exactly the same way as his parents particularly grated) and the writing was simplistic and uninspired.
41 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Giver.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

02/22 marked as: read

Comments (showing 1-8 of 8) (8 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

Madeline I agree with your low rating of the book, but I wonder if the truth about releasing was supposed to be a surprise? I remember knowing immediately what the characters meant when they said "release" when I read this as a 12-year-old, and I think the point is supposed to be that the readers know what it means, but the characters don't. So the actual release scene serves as a revelation for Jonas, not us.

Gloria Mundi Maybe you are right. But that's another thing that felt unrealistic. In a world where a significant proportion of the population must be either directly involved in or closely connected with releasing people, it would be impossible to keep it completely secret, not even from a kid. And I find it unbelievable that no one finds it horrific or objectionable, as Jonas immediately does. How does a man with predisposition for looking after babies spend a year nurturing one and then talks very calmly about killing it? Unless everyone else in that society is somehow modified to the point where they are unable to feel any empathy or sense of connection to another human being, which is not suggested at any point, that just doesn't make sense.

Esther Lily spoke the same way as her parents because that's the way she was taught. Didn't you understand the premise there? Kids weren't allowed to be kids.

Helene I totally agree with your review. Nothing convinced me that this possibly could be any sort if reality. The community was so dull which then in turn created a dull book. And don't get me started on the stupid ended. Bad! Bad! Bad! I would call this the worst book I read this year, but sadly there were worse

Mia (Parentheses Enthusiast) I agree with every single thing you presented, and I am extremely glad I'm not alone in disliking this book.

Merrilyn I agree completely. I had high hopes for this book due to others ratings but in the end, it left much to be desired. Glad it was so short and I only wasted a couple of days on it.

Sarah I agree with everything you said :-)

message 8: by Lee (new) - rated it 3 stars

Lee Coleman amen! finally!...the first review i have stumbled on which references the very things that disappointed me about the book. everyone keeps remarking on the political aspects of the story, and i can't get past how this community ever came to be established. i get it is a short novel, but memory and mood altering technology? climate and terrain manipulation? is society ignorant or do people just not care? i can't even focus on the very simple story- the whole time i'm wondering why everyone seems to forget what happened ten years ago, why can't people listen to music, why (and how) would society need to supress the ability to perceive color if everything is so regulated that inequality and discrimination are impossible? seriously...the entire book, i was completely distracted by the improbability of the whole set up.

back to top