Madeleine's Reviews > Love Is a Mix Tape: Life and Loss, One Song at a Time
Love Is a Mix Tape: Life and Loss, One Song at a Time
by Rob Sheffield
by Rob Sheffield
Madeleine's review
bookshelves: head-in-the-clouds-nose-in-a-book, soothing-the-savage-breast, let-us-now-speak-of-great-men, mmxii, our-libeary
Jan 03, 12
bookshelves: head-in-the-clouds-nose-in-a-book, soothing-the-savage-breast, let-us-now-speak-of-great-men, mmxii, our-libeary
Read from January 02 to 03, 2012
I started reading this book during the two-day buffer between the beginnings of both 2012 proper and the working year, thinking that I’d have to look no farther than the other end of the couch if the story really destroyed me to the point of needing my myriad mostly-under-control-but-always-threatening-to-surface spousal fears allayed by husbandly hugs. Turns out, catching up on laundry and tidying up our soon-to-be-vacated first home ate into my reading time and I wound up finishing this about an hour after hubs left for work. (Luckily, this book wasn't the sob-fest I was fearing, which is a huge point for the "pro" column.)
But you know what? That lost solitary reading time was put to good use. Hubs and I giggled our way through the brutal minute-long walk to the laundry room, encountered a comedy of errors while corralling our smallclothes and turned vacuuming into a contact sport. And I think that, more than actually sitting down with “Love is a Mix Tape,” helped drive home the unspoken point of the book, which is that you never know how much time you'll have with someone so you'd better make the most of the present.
Every time I’ve seen Rob Scheffield waxing eloquent about music on television, he always seems to have this goofy grin and be a generally amiable person, an image which I’m sure is aided by how not pretentious he is about the music he loves (that's admittedly foreign territory to me). We can all agree that a personable demeanor is unusual for a rock critic and an avid connoisseur of music, right? Because you should believe everything you see on TV, I assumed he was a happy-go-lucky dude who just truly loves and is animated by music. So imagine my surprise when I realized there’s a heart-rending tale under all of that.
This isn’t a prettied-up-for-mass-consumption account of an individual's personal tragedy that is just, like, so super unique and deserving of publication because the author said so, thank God. It’s about Rob. It’s about other things, too, of course – music being chief among them – but mostly how they’ve left distinct and indelible marks on Rob’s persona. Renee gets a lot of mention, but she’s a living, thriving presence for most of the book. The reader wouldn’t get the full extent of the things that made Renee so magnetic if this was another pity-party strutting its stuff for affirmations of the author’s suffering. Instead, Rob displays enough of his late wife’s traits and habits to make us understand her without betraying all of her secrets. We see Renee through Rob’s eyes: She’s flawed but good-hearted, quirky but grounded, an individual who’s bubbling over with life.
It is so obvious that Rob is still smitten with Renee and probably has been since their first encounter. And it’s obvious that his love is motivated by who she is as a whole rather than what she represents to him. For someone with so little relationship experience, like Rob, that kind of selflessness is nigh impossible to either understand or execute. But you can tell that this boy is just wild about his girl by the way she’s framed within the book.
A memoir like this should be more of a tribute and less of a fishbowl therapy session, and it should exist to deliver a message rather than parade the author's personal tragedies in morbid self-congratulation; thankfully, this one rises above the usual credibility-killing narcissistic pitfalls. There are no excessive displays of grief and Rob doesn't rely on his wife's death as the storytelling vehicle, as either would be disrespectful to Rob and Renee’s short-lived union. Rob mourns his wife, of course, accepts that he’ll never be rewarded for dealing with his widower status by getting to have Renee back, and spends an appropriate amount of time in the fetal position, but he does so with dignity. He doesn’t want to wallow in self pity or spend night after lonely night in a cemetery because to do so would be to succumb to a dismissal of Renee’s joie de vivre, which was clearly one of her defining attributes.
There were definite divisions marking life before, during and after Renee, which certainly helped the story find a universally applicable element, but it’s Rob’s love of music that gives this books its strongest framework. Just like there was life with and without Renee, there’s music before and after Renee, too. For every milestone, be it as a child or a grieving adult, there’s a song or album or band to serve as the soundtrack. What is music’s greatest purpose if not to act as a personalized landscape for each individual, after all?
As someone who went through a rabidly elitist phase of music consumption (a phase that has, fortunately, waned over the years but still needs to assert its lingering presence at the least appropriate times) and is drawn to those who’ve traveled a similar path, I feel pretty confident in saying that the least musically talented music aficionados aren’t the most accepting folks. It’s easy to scoff at pop music and the bands who create it but Rob doesn’t fall victim to this. He admits to secretly loving some disco ditties as a teenager and accepts his phases of enjoying some truly craptastic tunes. The mix tapes’ track listings that open each chapter illustrate that he never really let go of that open-mindedness, which make his honesty and vulnerability regarding other facets of his life that much more credible. He doesn’t limit himself to the music that’s peripherally cool or only listen to what the radio spoon-feeds him, which, to me, demonstrated an unabashed affinity for all music, much to his credit.
One of the points that Rob subtly made was that when two people are just as sick about music as they are about each other, music gradually becomes a third entity in the relationship. Having that life raft of shared music (and, later, music he wishes he could share with Renee) is what kept the intimacy of his late wife close and, as I saw it, kept Rob from totally coming unglued. It always seemed like he knew he’d soldier on without his other half, but music seemed to be what kept propelling him forward, however stumblingly or reluctantly.
Music does emerge as the real hero and great unifier when it comes to the crux of the story, though the quiet messages of human kindness and self-discovery serve as its moral. I held myself together through Rob’s accounts of Renee’s death and funeral and his mourning period; what finally pierced my groggy heart was Rob’s awe over complete strangers’ acts of kindness toward him. I’m a sucker for the moment the veil of cynicism is lifted (probably because I’m pretty certain humanity comprises a bunch of selfish jerks and, therefore, get all warm and gooey when someone can convince me otherwise for a little while), and Rob’s realization that he can’t go back to his former skepticism over the goodness of people was a defining moment of the story. Yes, there is some goodness in the world: It just took a world-shattering tragedy for Rob to gain some firsthand knowledge of it. Human kindness helped him to move on while pointing out the places where some silver lining is peeking through.
It is hard to write about a loved one’s sudden death without summoning every cheaply sentimental cop-out to prey on the audience’s emotions, so Rob gets all kinds of kudos for offering up a good read rather than a cloying trick. This is a beautiful remembrance of a well-loved someone while doubling as a love letter to the music that will always be there through the highest highs, lowest lows and every small moment or long car ride between.
But you know what? That lost solitary reading time was put to good use. Hubs and I giggled our way through the brutal minute-long walk to the laundry room, encountered a comedy of errors while corralling our smallclothes and turned vacuuming into a contact sport. And I think that, more than actually sitting down with “Love is a Mix Tape,” helped drive home the unspoken point of the book, which is that you never know how much time you'll have with someone so you'd better make the most of the present.
Every time I’ve seen Rob Scheffield waxing eloquent about music on television, he always seems to have this goofy grin and be a generally amiable person, an image which I’m sure is aided by how not pretentious he is about the music he loves (that's admittedly foreign territory to me). We can all agree that a personable demeanor is unusual for a rock critic and an avid connoisseur of music, right? Because you should believe everything you see on TV, I assumed he was a happy-go-lucky dude who just truly loves and is animated by music. So imagine my surprise when I realized there’s a heart-rending tale under all of that.
This isn’t a prettied-up-for-mass-consumption account of an individual's personal tragedy that is just, like, so super unique and deserving of publication because the author said so, thank God. It’s about Rob. It’s about other things, too, of course – music being chief among them – but mostly how they’ve left distinct and indelible marks on Rob’s persona. Renee gets a lot of mention, but she’s a living, thriving presence for most of the book. The reader wouldn’t get the full extent of the things that made Renee so magnetic if this was another pity-party strutting its stuff for affirmations of the author’s suffering. Instead, Rob displays enough of his late wife’s traits and habits to make us understand her without betraying all of her secrets. We see Renee through Rob’s eyes: She’s flawed but good-hearted, quirky but grounded, an individual who’s bubbling over with life.
It is so obvious that Rob is still smitten with Renee and probably has been since their first encounter. And it’s obvious that his love is motivated by who she is as a whole rather than what she represents to him. For someone with so little relationship experience, like Rob, that kind of selflessness is nigh impossible to either understand or execute. But you can tell that this boy is just wild about his girl by the way she’s framed within the book.
A memoir like this should be more of a tribute and less of a fishbowl therapy session, and it should exist to deliver a message rather than parade the author's personal tragedies in morbid self-congratulation; thankfully, this one rises above the usual credibility-killing narcissistic pitfalls. There are no excessive displays of grief and Rob doesn't rely on his wife's death as the storytelling vehicle, as either would be disrespectful to Rob and Renee’s short-lived union. Rob mourns his wife, of course, accepts that he’ll never be rewarded for dealing with his widower status by getting to have Renee back, and spends an appropriate amount of time in the fetal position, but he does so with dignity. He doesn’t want to wallow in self pity or spend night after lonely night in a cemetery because to do so would be to succumb to a dismissal of Renee’s joie de vivre, which was clearly one of her defining attributes.
There were definite divisions marking life before, during and after Renee, which certainly helped the story find a universally applicable element, but it’s Rob’s love of music that gives this books its strongest framework. Just like there was life with and without Renee, there’s music before and after Renee, too. For every milestone, be it as a child or a grieving adult, there’s a song or album or band to serve as the soundtrack. What is music’s greatest purpose if not to act as a personalized landscape for each individual, after all?
As someone who went through a rabidly elitist phase of music consumption (a phase that has, fortunately, waned over the years but still needs to assert its lingering presence at the least appropriate times) and is drawn to those who’ve traveled a similar path, I feel pretty confident in saying that the least musically talented music aficionados aren’t the most accepting folks. It’s easy to scoff at pop music and the bands who create it but Rob doesn’t fall victim to this. He admits to secretly loving some disco ditties as a teenager and accepts his phases of enjoying some truly craptastic tunes. The mix tapes’ track listings that open each chapter illustrate that he never really let go of that open-mindedness, which make his honesty and vulnerability regarding other facets of his life that much more credible. He doesn’t limit himself to the music that’s peripherally cool or only listen to what the radio spoon-feeds him, which, to me, demonstrated an unabashed affinity for all music, much to his credit.
One of the points that Rob subtly made was that when two people are just as sick about music as they are about each other, music gradually becomes a third entity in the relationship. Having that life raft of shared music (and, later, music he wishes he could share with Renee) is what kept the intimacy of his late wife close and, as I saw it, kept Rob from totally coming unglued. It always seemed like he knew he’d soldier on without his other half, but music seemed to be what kept propelling him forward, however stumblingly or reluctantly.
Music does emerge as the real hero and great unifier when it comes to the crux of the story, though the quiet messages of human kindness and self-discovery serve as its moral. I held myself together through Rob’s accounts of Renee’s death and funeral and his mourning period; what finally pierced my groggy heart was Rob’s awe over complete strangers’ acts of kindness toward him. I’m a sucker for the moment the veil of cynicism is lifted (probably because I’m pretty certain humanity comprises a bunch of selfish jerks and, therefore, get all warm and gooey when someone can convince me otherwise for a little while), and Rob’s realization that he can’t go back to his former skepticism over the goodness of people was a defining moment of the story. Yes, there is some goodness in the world: It just took a world-shattering tragedy for Rob to gain some firsthand knowledge of it. Human kindness helped him to move on while pointing out the places where some silver lining is peeking through.
It is hard to write about a loved one’s sudden death without summoning every cheaply sentimental cop-out to prey on the audience’s emotions, so Rob gets all kinds of kudos for offering up a good read rather than a cloying trick. This is a beautiful remembrance of a well-loved someone while doubling as a love letter to the music that will always be there through the highest highs, lowest lows and every small moment or long car ride between.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Love Is a Mix Tape.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 01/03/2012 | page 219 |
|
100.0% |
Comments (showing 1-6 of 6) (6 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Mary
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jan 02, 2012 06:22am
I really quite enjoyed this book! I hope you do, too!
reply
|
flag
*
Thanks, Mary! I've been holding out on this one because I was so afraid it'd rely more on sentimental tactics than actual storytelling (I'm indiscriminately wary of memoirs) but it turned out to be a very nice surprise. I mean, as much as a story like this can be considered "nice."
I’m a sucker for the moment the veil of cynicism is lifted (probably because I’m pretty certain humanity comprises a bunch of selfish jerks and, therefore, get all warm and gooey when someone can convince me otherwise for a little while) I used to share this opinion of humanity at large and all it took was some pretty serious depression/anxiety to wake me up to seeing differently. I think that this is usually how it goes -- the goodness is there, but you can't appreciate it until you hit that point in your life where you just can't function without the help/love of others, really. And you see how freely some of them will give it to you, and you start to think that even though this lovingness and selflessness maybe isn't indicative of every person -- or, to be cynical about it, even the majority of persons -- the quantity of it in the ones who do have that altruism is plenty to be fulfilling. I don't think optimism about people is naivety. I think it's doing what we so infrequently do, because it's so hard: to be optimistic about people is to remember the compliments more than the criticisms.
But yes, sorry for the tangent. This is an excellent review!
Oh my goodness, do not apologize! Other people's perspectives are exactly the kind of thing I can't get enough of. I always want to hear different opinions and approaches to life, especially when they've converged with ones similar to my own before. Life's too short to get too complacent about one's vantage point.You're totally right about optimism and naivety not being the same thing. You can be optimistic about the goodness in human nature without subscribing to the notion that all people are good all the time.
My problem is that I don't get why it takes someone being a breath away from a breakdown or facing down a genuine tragedy to draw out that kindness from others. I mean, it's great that the potential's there and CAN be relied upon when it really matters, but I see so many instances of people disregarding others' happiness when it would be just as easy to extend a tiny bit of courtesy to another human being (hey, speaking of naivety...).
My other problem is that people just take themselves too damn seriously and are so ready to get offended about some minor (or imagined) attack that they're blind to both the bigger picture and the folks around them. I just can't help but get a bad taste from thinking that a person can lend a helping hand in one gesture and flip off the next three people they encounter with another. (Maybe it'd help if I'd stop assuming the worst from everyone but.... learned defenses die hard, ya know?)
As much as I dislike people, I dislike the idea of needless suffering, which certainly helps in trying to be the change I want to see. A surprising number of people DO respond well to voluntary friendliness, but the same people won't bother to hold the door for a stranger or stop at crosswalks. And I just get discouraged because it certainly seems like I'm the only one who's trying sometimes. Often. Logically, I know that I'm making connections that I really shouldn't make but actions DO speak loudest and an awful lot of people act like they have no regard for the people or world outside their bubbles.
But! It actually is so reassuring to know that there are instances of individuals tapping into this vast resource of love and warmth when they recognize that someone truly needs it. And, while I am so sorry that you had to explore some pretty heinous places to find this kind of insight, it's good to know that you can speak firsthand about how sometimes enough people can offer so much of themselves that it makes up for those who can't (or won't) learn how to embrace empathy.
to be optimistic about people is to remember the compliments more than the criticisms.
You're right about this, and you're right that it's monstrously hard to do.
Thank you for all of this. Yours is an excellent comment! :)
My problem is that I don't get why it takes someone being a breath away from a breakdown or facing down a genuine tragedy to draw out that kindness from others.This depends on experience, so it's in no way objective, but now that I've been doing fine for a little while I see that the goodness is there all along, in every season. Having a breakdown just opened my eyes to it. But I think it was there anyway.
Sure, every once in a while someone won't say thank you for a favor or won't give a fraction of the kindness I've given to them back to me, and it provokes sort of a "huh, look at that" reaction in me. But I've started to view that as ignorance and not malevolence, like they are so preoccupied with their thoughts that their reaction has nothing to do with a personal slight but because they're not paying attention to things going on around them. That sort of selfishness doesn't bother me; we all have it to some extent (I'd worry about someone who didn't). Calling this "ignorance" doesn't necessarily excuse the behavior, but it helps me to realize it's done without malice and it doesn't mean people are inherently bad. It doesn't mean people are inherently good, either. They're just people.
Frankly, the only actions that upset me -- really upset me -- are the ones that I know are personal attacks. It takes some work for me to not mentally apply that pettiness to all of humanity. But I've built up enough love for people to push back at the cynicism at every opportunity. :)
But I've started to view that as ignorance and not malevolence, like they are so preoccupied with their thoughts that their reaction has nothing to do with a personal slight but because they're not paying attention to things going on around them.You know, this is actually something that I HAVE come to figure out on my own, thanks largely to how my job had me at my wits' end this time last year. And also by observing people who I've come to see as embodying a lot of my own lesser qualities. Nothing is quite as sobering and behavior-changing as that "Is THAT how people see me?" moment when someone displays a trait I can't even stand in myself.
The absolute best editor I've ever had was this mild-mannered, soft-spoken middle-aged guy who's staggeringly wise and just a really gentle soul. Among the countless gems of advice he offered me was The Five Percent Rule. It basically explained that, especially as journalists, we hear mostly about the five percent of the population who are beneficially active in the community or doing something spectacular, as well as the less savory five percent representing the dregs of society or those who just want to scream their misinformed pieces over the milder majority of the masses. The other ninety percent just want to go about their lives as smoothly as possible, take care of their families and fly under the radar, so it's not right to assume lousy things about humanity based on the actions of a highly visible but barely representative portion of the population. Your comments have definitely had me thinking about the truth behind that belief for the past couple of days.
If I step back from whatever or whoever is bothering me, I do know that sometimes you just encounter someone on a bad day. I can't tell you how many times I've immediately wanted to take back something I've said or done and be all "I swear I'm not usually this unprovokedly bitchy!" I don't know if I'll ever get to the point when a less pessimistic view of society becomes my default perspective but it definitely helps when someone points out that people really aren't as hopeless as I've got them pegged.
Frankly, the only actions that upset me -- really upset me -- are the ones that I know are personal attacks.
Amen, sister. A-freaking-men.
