false 3 0 false false Sat Mar 01 00:00:00 -0800 2008 Tue Mar 18 12:07:07 -0700 2008 Tue Mar 18 12:16:33 -0700 2008
however, he tries and fails to illuminate how the artists, writers, and philosophers of the age both depicted madness and exemplified it. at these points, foucault gives himself to whatever rhetorical flight of fancy he deems fit. everything has a double meaning that folds in on itself and negates the blah blah blah.

as a succinct word of advice: skip the conclusion. it's pretty unnecessary.]]>