<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="17974481">
    <user id="875145">
    <name><![CDATA[Jamal]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[San Francisco, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/875145-jamal]]></url>
    
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">633927</id>
  <isbn>0316015040</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780316015042</isbn13>
  <ratings_count type="integer">55</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">19</text_reviews_count>
  <title>Agincourt: Henry V and the Battle That Made England</title>
  <average_rating></average_rating>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1176529097m/633927.jpg</image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/633927.Agincourt_Henry_V_and_the_Battle_That_Made_England</link>
<author>
  <id type="integer">21403</id>
  <name>Juliet Barker</name>
  <ratings_count type="integer">257</ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">48</text_reviews_count>
</author>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Apr 14 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Mar 17 17:43:30 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Apr 14 01:18:27 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[It's less of a military history than it is a general anthropological survey of the Agincourt period.  This isn't a critique as much as it is a warning to those seeking battle plans, descriptions of armament and the like.<br/><br/>Still, it's authoritative and well researched.  The writing is fluid and compelling and accurately portrays the inherent scale and drama of the campaign as well as exposing the motivations, social and personal (and interpersonal) that drove and drive HIStory.<br/><br/>Though her descriptions of Henry tend to the hagiographic, Barker none-the-less answers well the age old question of which makes which; the man or the time.  She does this without the overarching dogmatism of some armchair historians.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17974481]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>