Kassa's Reviews > Home Again
Home Again (Home #1)
by Cardeno C. (Goodreads Author)
by Cardeno C. (Goodreads Author)
I read Home Again because I wanted to read the sequel – He Completes Me – and assumed I had to read the first book in the series. Unfortunately the couple in the sequel is only in one scene of Home Again so I could have saved myself the agony of reading this one. Except to be fair it isn’t agonizing. The story is easy to read just not very good. I hear the sequel is funny and the characters are adorable so I’m still game to read that one but sadly this book went off the rails at the beginning and never quite recovered. I don’t recommend it at all and suggest readers look for some of the better amnesia plot books out there (such as Amor En Retrograde).
The plot of Home Again starts with Noah in present time waking up from a coma. He’s been there due to an accident, though the details of which are never explained, and he’s anxious to see his long time lover Clark again. Although Noah’s only been in the hospital for a few weeks, the last thing he can remember is three years ago. There’s obviously an elephant in the room relating to something that happened between Noah and Clark but Noah doesn’t remember what that is until much later with Clark’s help. Noah only knows that he loves and needs his partner. Interspersed between the Noah’s present day recitation of events are flashbacks from Clark’s perspective as he reveals how the two met and fell in love.
The basic premise of the story isn’t bad - two lovers dealing with an accident get a second chance at their relationship. Unfortunately, the writing, pacing, and characterization just kills this story entirely. To start with the writing is problematic. The tense is past but tends to slip into present repeatedly. The prose and language are simplistic with basic words and lack a real literary eloquence. The descriptive portions are stale with overused phrases and analogies. There are also a lot of sex scenes in the book, in fact the second half is almost entirely sex scenes with large passages of exposition. The graphic sexual writing had me cringing and I skimmed these scenes since I didn’t find them sexy, titillating, or enjoyable. Additionally, the large information dumps keep a telling rather than showing tone with information repeated constantly throughout the story.
The biggest problem I had though is with the characters themselves. Noah and Clark meet when Noah is only thirteen to Clark’s seventeen yet both Noah and Clark display a maturity and emotional stability of men decades older. Even Noah’s wild child, acting out antics are more cries for help and Clark’s attention than real teenage angst. Noah’s dialogue and thoughts and Clark’s perspective just don’t add up to two young men. This definitely plays into the inconsistent presentation of both men. Noah goes from being a mature, intelligent man who knows what he wants and isn’t afraid to defend it to being stupid, immature, and destructive. Neither of these feel like variations of a complex person but more so wildly different people smashed together in the same name.
Similarly Clark bounces back and forth from an understanding and intelligent young man to overly nurturing and almost suffocating. The story is trying to portray how deeply in love the two men are. That they are soul mates and knew that from a very young age. Yet their constant use of nicknames, angel and sweetheart, becomes too precious and overused. Likewise Noah has some totally random and outrageous jealousy problem, which makes no sense given how the two are always eating each other’s faces. So how and why could Noah ever be jealous? The story goes to great lengths to show how in love they are so I never understood where Noah’s jealousy or the vague BDSM references came from.
The actual event that Noah initially refuses to remember is ridiculous, flat out. It’s so stupid and the rationale may baffle even the most willing reader to understand. Not to mention the equally ridiculous reactions and justifications of both men. It’s out of character for all the participants, makes absolutely no sense, and is simply an obvious manipulation to inject tension into the story. Tension, which outside of that event, doesn’t really exist. There’s an attempt to throw Noah’s brother, Ben, into the mix but again this is unnecessary and an obvious misstep since it simply doesn’t belong nor does it really work with the characters and the story.
Having said all of that, which adds up to a pretty bad reading experience, the actual book flies by. It’s easy to read, even if not always enjoyable and entertaining. Reader tastes may vary so if the issues I had are not the same as another reader they could perhaps like this. Unfortunately the story simply needs more work in my opinion so I wouldn’t recommend it. I will however go to the second book –the whole point of reading this one – and hope for the best.
The plot of Home Again starts with Noah in present time waking up from a coma. He’s been there due to an accident, though the details of which are never explained, and he’s anxious to see his long time lover Clark again. Although Noah’s only been in the hospital for a few weeks, the last thing he can remember is three years ago. There’s obviously an elephant in the room relating to something that happened between Noah and Clark but Noah doesn’t remember what that is until much later with Clark’s help. Noah only knows that he loves and needs his partner. Interspersed between the Noah’s present day recitation of events are flashbacks from Clark’s perspective as he reveals how the two met and fell in love.
The basic premise of the story isn’t bad - two lovers dealing with an accident get a second chance at their relationship. Unfortunately, the writing, pacing, and characterization just kills this story entirely. To start with the writing is problematic. The tense is past but tends to slip into present repeatedly. The prose and language are simplistic with basic words and lack a real literary eloquence. The descriptive portions are stale with overused phrases and analogies. There are also a lot of sex scenes in the book, in fact the second half is almost entirely sex scenes with large passages of exposition. The graphic sexual writing had me cringing and I skimmed these scenes since I didn’t find them sexy, titillating, or enjoyable. Additionally, the large information dumps keep a telling rather than showing tone with information repeated constantly throughout the story.
The biggest problem I had though is with the characters themselves. Noah and Clark meet when Noah is only thirteen to Clark’s seventeen yet both Noah and Clark display a maturity and emotional stability of men decades older. Even Noah’s wild child, acting out antics are more cries for help and Clark’s attention than real teenage angst. Noah’s dialogue and thoughts and Clark’s perspective just don’t add up to two young men. This definitely plays into the inconsistent presentation of both men. Noah goes from being a mature, intelligent man who knows what he wants and isn’t afraid to defend it to being stupid, immature, and destructive. Neither of these feel like variations of a complex person but more so wildly different people smashed together in the same name.
Similarly Clark bounces back and forth from an understanding and intelligent young man to overly nurturing and almost suffocating. The story is trying to portray how deeply in love the two men are. That they are soul mates and knew that from a very young age. Yet their constant use of nicknames, angel and sweetheart, becomes too precious and overused. Likewise Noah has some totally random and outrageous jealousy problem, which makes no sense given how the two are always eating each other’s faces. So how and why could Noah ever be jealous? The story goes to great lengths to show how in love they are so I never understood where Noah’s jealousy or the vague BDSM references came from.
The actual event that Noah initially refuses to remember is ridiculous, flat out. It’s so stupid and the rationale may baffle even the most willing reader to understand. Not to mention the equally ridiculous reactions and justifications of both men. It’s out of character for all the participants, makes absolutely no sense, and is simply an obvious manipulation to inject tension into the story. Tension, which outside of that event, doesn’t really exist. There’s an attempt to throw Noah’s brother, Ben, into the mix but again this is unnecessary and an obvious misstep since it simply doesn’t belong nor does it really work with the characters and the story.
Having said all of that, which adds up to a pretty bad reading experience, the actual book flies by. It’s easy to read, even if not always enjoyable and entertaining. Reader tastes may vary so if the issues I had are not the same as another reader they could perhaps like this. Unfortunately the story simply needs more work in my opinion so I wouldn’t recommend it. I will however go to the second book –the whole point of reading this one – and hope for the best.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Home Again.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-14 of 14) (14 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Chris
(new)
Jun 06, 2011 07:55am
Oh my... Thanks for the heads up!
reply
|
flag
*
I only gave it 3 stars because I actually enjoyed the "Past" but turned off by the "Present". You're right, it needs more work. Since I'm not impressed, I'm not reading the 2nd book. Or maybe if I decide to it will be far, far in the future ^_^
Welcome Chris!Ami, you were pretty generous with the rating so perhaps you should continue with the series. I actually gave the second and third books 3 stars because I think they were much better. So since you liked one portion of the book.. perhaps try the next two.
I keep hearing about how great the second book is. After reviewing the first one, with all the problems it had, and having to force myself through it, I just gave up. Now I'm wondering if I should read #2 after all.
@Kassa: I admit I don't give 1-star rating that many. If I don't LOATHE it, I still give like 2-3 stars, for the so-so books :p.
Cole, I wouldn't call the second book great. This author for me is likely to never be great. However the second book is legions better than this one. This one is very bad and though the second one has issues, it's better than this one. For comparison sake this one I obviously gave a 1 but I gave the second one a 3.
Ami, I go by the goodreads rating. 1=I didn't like it. So I didn't like this and it gets a one.
Kassa,I agree, though admittedly, I have only read one of her books -- the first of this series. It just seems like these books have been flowing back and forth across the GR channels a lot lately, and I keep seeing comments about how great book #2 was. I've been inclined not to believe them, but then I suppose I'm prejudiced from not liking the first one at all.
I also was going to read this book before the second one. I guess now I won't. I was never really interested in the storyline to begin with, just thought I had to read it cus it said book 1.Just will jump to the second book.
@Cole.. I've not seen those comments but I wouldn't call the second one great. It's better. Seeing as how we were in agreement about the first book (even if we differed rating wise) you're likely to like the 2nd bk better. However it's still not perfect. There are many other books I'd probably recommend over this one.@ Darien
I'd jump to book 2 or even 3 (whichever interests you) with ease. This series is one that is only very very loosely connected together.
Hi Allie, if you didn't like Amor En Retrograde but liked this one perhaps we just have different tastes? I wouldn't slog through something you didn't like.
Moods change. Sometimes I like a certain style and sometimes I don't. Right now I am reading just to get out of an awful funk so these books are all positive and light and are helping. Something more thought provoking just wont work for me right now (my father was killed last month). See why these stories are working for me right now. They're about uncomplicated love, for the most part, with few obstacles. My parents were together for almost 50 years and these books are what I need right now. Amor En Retrogrado might work for me one day. I totally give up on very few books (one other than AER and I won't ever try completing that one!).
I'm so sorry to hear that Allie and totally understand your desire for easy romance books then. AER is definitely not that so maybe hold onto that for a while longer. Have you tried Mary Calmes? I tend to think of her books as easy, uncomplicated but enjoyable romances - which could be up your alley.
