Lea's Reviews > The Sisters Brothers
The Sisters Brothers
by Patrick deWitt
by Patrick deWitt
Lea's review
bookshelves: love-the-cover, acquired-2011, read-2011, reviews
May 29, 11
bookshelves: love-the-cover, acquired-2011, read-2011, reviews
Read from May 28 to 29, 2011 — I own a copy, read count: 1
This is a deceptively simple book. The writing is simple, the chapters are short, on the surface of it the story itself is quite simple. But there are ideas here that run much deeper than what you see on the surface.
Charlie and Eli Sisters are killers, so famous that simply stating their names makes people shake with fear. Charlie is brash and ruthless. Eli, who narrates their tale, is introspective and soft hearted. He's been drawn into this life by his feelings of loyalty and protectiveness towards his brother. Sadly, Charlie has manipulated Eli into helping him, when he would rather be living a simple shopkeeper's life.
At the heart of the story is their quest to find Hermann Kermit Warm, a man their boss, the Commodore, has determined must die. Why he must be killed is part of the mystery, and is also the cause of great tragedy.
I don't read a lot of westerns, just this book and parts of True Grit, so I'm not sure if the style of this book is common for the genre. It seems very similar to True Grit to me. I really enjoyed it -- although told simply (or maybe because it's told simply), the story really packs a punch. I found myself very concerned for all of the characters, even though many of them weren't initially likable. The language is stark and old-fashioned, and seems very appropriate to the story and the genre.
I also have to mention the gorgeous cover art and design by Dan Stiles (hardcover). This is eye-catching artwork, and it relates directly to the story. The cover art is continued within the book, most notably on the "Intermission" pages.
I can't recommend this book highly enough -- I think it's a story that will linger in the mind and in the heart, long after the last page is read.
Charlie and Eli Sisters are killers, so famous that simply stating their names makes people shake with fear. Charlie is brash and ruthless. Eli, who narrates their tale, is introspective and soft hearted. He's been drawn into this life by his feelings of loyalty and protectiveness towards his brother. Sadly, Charlie has manipulated Eli into helping him, when he would rather be living a simple shopkeeper's life.
At the heart of the story is their quest to find Hermann Kermit Warm, a man their boss, the Commodore, has determined must die. Why he must be killed is part of the mystery, and is also the cause of great tragedy.
I don't read a lot of westerns, just this book and parts of True Grit, so I'm not sure if the style of this book is common for the genre. It seems very similar to True Grit to me. I really enjoyed it -- although told simply (or maybe because it's told simply), the story really packs a punch. I found myself very concerned for all of the characters, even though many of them weren't initially likable. The language is stark and old-fashioned, and seems very appropriate to the story and the genre.
I also have to mention the gorgeous cover art and design by Dan Stiles (hardcover). This is eye-catching artwork, and it relates directly to the story. The cover art is continued within the book, most notably on the "Intermission" pages.
I can't recommend this book highly enough -- I think it's a story that will linger in the mind and in the heart, long after the last page is read.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Sisters Brothers.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-6 of 6) (6 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Lou
(new)
-
added it
Oct 08, 2011 01:16pm
Sold another sold to me to read from friends
reply
|
flag
*
thanks I have like western styled stories like Gunslinger. Last night watched classic western Pale Rider with the great Eastwood in.
I agree with the assessment of the language as "start and old-fashioned." Although I dislike McCarthy for the same reasons, I think it is more a reflection of the narrator's mind than an authorial technique. Anyway, I agree with your assessment of this novel.
Matthew wrote: "I agree with the assessment of the language as "start and old-fashioned." Although I dislike McCarthy for the same reasons, I think it is more a reflection of the narrator's mind than an authorial..."I think that's a really good point -- thanks for calling that to my attention!

