Cory's Reviews > The Future of Us
The Future of Us
by Jay Asher (Goodreads Author), Carolyn Mackler
by Jay Asher (Goodreads Author), Carolyn Mackler
Cory's review
bookshelves: contemporary, science-fiction, fantasy, young-adult
May 18, 12
bookshelves: contemporary, science-fiction, fantasy, young-adult
Recommended for:
No one
Read on December 16, 2011 — I own a copy
I didn't think it was possible, but Jay Asher and Carolyn Mackler managed to fuck up one of the best ideas of 2011.
I loved Thirteen Reasons Why, despite the various issues I had with it. So you can imagine how much I was anticipating The Future of Us. I pre-ordered it, and I never pre-order books. Now it's sitting on my bookcase like an evil step child, laughing at me for my foolishness. I thought this collaboration would be brilliant. I'd never read My Butt, the Earth, and Other Round Things, but it was a Printz contender, which must have set it apart from vapid chick-lit like The Princess Diaries and All American Girl. So why does this read like a David Levithan/Rachel Cohn Collaboration?
ETA: I read My Butt, the Earth, and Other Round Things a few months ago. I didn't like it. In fact, it was rather vapid, in league with All American Girl or The Princess Diaries. Give me Ruby Oliver over whatshername any day. I don't know why the hell it was a Printz Contender.
It's quite possibly the most disappointing book I've ever read. Even more disappointing than Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows. It takes an epic premise and fails on every mark. And then it doesn't even give us an ending. It trudges along, through the mud of false suspense, and dies before it even gets out of the sludge.
Now, before I continue this review, I should let you know that I am a teenager. I'm seventeen and I have friends who are just as, or even more, vapid than the teenagers in this novel. Problem is, I have no interest in reading about idiots, no matter how realistic they are. I want dynamic, well written characters, not whiny teenage girls who worry about old condoms their best friends keep in their wallets. Hell, that doesn't even bother me -- when it's done the right way. Sara Zarr does it well. Elizabeth Scott does it well. These authors, in this book, failed on every account.
As a contemporary novel, it fails.
As a science-fiction novel, it fails.
As a fantasy novel, it fails.
As a snap-shot of the 90's, it fails.
This reads like a bad PBS special, or that Groundhog Day rip-off Nickolodean ran after Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide ended. I'm calling Miranda Cosgrove and Nathan Kress to star in this because at least they'd make it interesting. And that's not saying much.
I'm not even a real 90's kid, and this reads like a fake rendition of what the 90's were.
I have so many issues with this novel, I have to make a list.
1. Emma
If you're suddenly given a portal into your future Facebook account, what do you do?
a) Look into the politics of the future.
b) See how you can make a quick buck off of future companies by investing in the stock market.
c) Find out who wins the future Superbowl/World Series/March Madness so you can win a bunch of money.
d) Worry about who your future husband is 24/7.
Once you've changed your future and you're happy with your husband, what do you do now?
a) Figure out possible career paths for yourself.
b) Check up on your family.
c) Use knowledge of the future to your benefit, while avoiding the butterfly effect.
d) Whine because you want a hotter guy.
After you've generally screwed everything up to the point where you're depressed and living in an unhappy marriage, what do you do now?
a) Leave the future alone because, you, idiot that you are, can change it simply by not marrying who your Facebook page says you will.
b) Realize that the future is constantly changing and that there are millions of outcomes that become void once you're aware of them.
c) Realize that because you've seen this outcome, that means your future self wants it.
d) Whine about how unfair everything is.
Now that you've really fucked up your future, you decide to kiss your best friend, who absolutely adores you, in the hopes of having a drastic change in your future. What do you do when he calls you out on your bullshit?
a) Apologize
b) Ask him out.
c) Feign confusion.
d) Blame him and make him apologize to you.
If you answered d) to any of the above, please defriend me and stop reading this review. I have no patience for you in my social sphere.
Emma is quite honestly one of the most shallow characters I've ever had the displeasure to read about. Her thoughts revolve around guys, 24/7. Which guy is hot, which guy isn't, and who she's going to marry. Seriously, her big (one chapter) resolution was about how she never gave herself to her boyfriend completely and she resolved to be more committed. Eh, no. Her real problem is that she was a shallow bitch who didn't really care who she used to get what she wanted. And she didn't really have goals outside of getting a hot husband, unless you count her fleeting commitment to getting into a decent college, which is dropped halfway through the novel to focus on her relationships.
There's nothing wrong with a novel that focuses on relationships -- when those relationships are interesting. The character development here is barebones at best.
2. Kellan
The award for biggest hypocritical misandrist goes to Kellan, Emma's best friend. Honestly, I couldn't have cared less about her plot line. And, strange enough, it's never resolved.
Just remember this bit of wisdom -- if a girl is leading you on and jerking your chain left and right, don't ever think about moving on because she might want you back. And if you go on a date, she has the right to be pissy, especially when she decided, that very week, to break up with her boyfriend and go on a date with another guy she talks about constantly. Because you're her back up plan. Don't ever forget that. It's not manipulation. It's love, girls and boys.
3. Sydney
I liked Syd. Unfortunately, she's the placeholder girlfriend. Why Josh likes Emma over her, I have no fucking idea. Sydney is hot. Sydney is nice. Sydney is rich. And Sydney is way more interesting than Emma. In fact, I wanted to know the details of her relationship with Rick and what might have lead to her being the only girl in their class to stand up for No means No and Yes means Yes.
4. The Plot
Plot lines are mentioned and dropped like 2012 republican candidates. It's ridiculous. One moment, Josh is worried that his brother might be gay. The next? Nothing. One moment Emma think Kellan is pregnant. The next? Nothing. As for the main plot line? The only reason I finished this book was because I wanted to know if Emma would be unhappy in her future, and if Josh would move on. That's a piss poor way to keep the story moving.
5. The End
There was no end. It's like someone left out the third act because they were too lazy to finish writing the book. And I'm guilty of that. But I expect more from Printz honor authors and NYT Bestselling authors.
6. The Science, or Lack of
If you're reading this because you want a decent spec fic read, don't bother. This is a Degrassi special that desperately wants to fit in with the Animorphs.
This is why people don't like YA. Along with Across the Universe, this novel is everything that's wrong with the genre. Instead of focusing on, I dunno, the story, the characters, or, hell, an interesting romance, we're once again given a boring tale of Mr. And Mrs. White Teenager and their Oh So Dull First World Problems. Save yourself the effort. Just go watch The N.
It's 1996, and less than half of all American high school students have ever used the Internet.How do you fuck up an epic idea like that? I'll tell you how -- you focus on two vapid teenagers and their relationship issues.
Emma just got her first computer and an America Online CD-ROM.
Josh is her best friend. They power up and log on--and discover themselves on Facebook, fifteen years in the future.
Everybody wonders what their Destiny will be. Josh and Emma are about to find out.
I loved Thirteen Reasons Why, despite the various issues I had with it. So you can imagine how much I was anticipating The Future of Us. I pre-ordered it, and I never pre-order books. Now it's sitting on my bookcase like an evil step child, laughing at me for my foolishness. I thought this collaboration would be brilliant. I'd never read My Butt, the Earth, and Other Round Things, but it was a Printz contender, which must have set it apart from vapid chick-lit like The Princess Diaries and All American Girl. So why does this read like a David Levithan/Rachel Cohn Collaboration?
ETA: I read My Butt, the Earth, and Other Round Things a few months ago. I didn't like it. In fact, it was rather vapid, in league with All American Girl or The Princess Diaries. Give me Ruby Oliver over whatshername any day. I don't know why the hell it was a Printz Contender.
It's quite possibly the most disappointing book I've ever read. Even more disappointing than Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows. It takes an epic premise and fails on every mark. And then it doesn't even give us an ending. It trudges along, through the mud of false suspense, and dies before it even gets out of the sludge.
Now, before I continue this review, I should let you know that I am a teenager. I'm seventeen and I have friends who are just as, or even more, vapid than the teenagers in this novel. Problem is, I have no interest in reading about idiots, no matter how realistic they are. I want dynamic, well written characters, not whiny teenage girls who worry about old condoms their best friends keep in their wallets. Hell, that doesn't even bother me -- when it's done the right way. Sara Zarr does it well. Elizabeth Scott does it well. These authors, in this book, failed on every account.
As a contemporary novel, it fails.
As a science-fiction novel, it fails.
As a fantasy novel, it fails.
As a snap-shot of the 90's, it fails.
This reads like a bad PBS special, or that Groundhog Day rip-off Nickolodean ran after Ned's Declassified School Survival Guide ended. I'm calling Miranda Cosgrove and Nathan Kress to star in this because at least they'd make it interesting. And that's not saying much.
I'm not even a real 90's kid, and this reads like a fake rendition of what the 90's were.
I have so many issues with this novel, I have to make a list.
1. Emma
If you're suddenly given a portal into your future Facebook account, what do you do?
a) Look into the politics of the future.
b) See how you can make a quick buck off of future companies by investing in the stock market.
c) Find out who wins the future Superbowl/World Series/March Madness so you can win a bunch of money.
d) Worry about who your future husband is 24/7.
Once you've changed your future and you're happy with your husband, what do you do now?
a) Figure out possible career paths for yourself.
b) Check up on your family.
c) Use knowledge of the future to your benefit, while avoiding the butterfly effect.
d) Whine because you want a hotter guy.
After you've generally screwed everything up to the point where you're depressed and living in an unhappy marriage, what do you do now?
a) Leave the future alone because, you, idiot that you are, can change it simply by not marrying who your Facebook page says you will.
b) Realize that the future is constantly changing and that there are millions of outcomes that become void once you're aware of them.
c) Realize that because you've seen this outcome, that means your future self wants it.
d) Whine about how unfair everything is.
Now that you've really fucked up your future, you decide to kiss your best friend, who absolutely adores you, in the hopes of having a drastic change in your future. What do you do when he calls you out on your bullshit?
a) Apologize
b) Ask him out.
c) Feign confusion.
d) Blame him and make him apologize to you.
If you answered d) to any of the above, please defriend me and stop reading this review. I have no patience for you in my social sphere.
Emma is quite honestly one of the most shallow characters I've ever had the displeasure to read about. Her thoughts revolve around guys, 24/7. Which guy is hot, which guy isn't, and who she's going to marry. Seriously, her big (one chapter) resolution was about how she never gave herself to her boyfriend completely and she resolved to be more committed. Eh, no. Her real problem is that she was a shallow bitch who didn't really care who she used to get what she wanted. And she didn't really have goals outside of getting a hot husband, unless you count her fleeting commitment to getting into a decent college, which is dropped halfway through the novel to focus on her relationships.
There's nothing wrong with a novel that focuses on relationships -- when those relationships are interesting. The character development here is barebones at best.
2. Kellan
The award for biggest hypocritical misandrist goes to Kellan, Emma's best friend. Honestly, I couldn't have cared less about her plot line. And, strange enough, it's never resolved.
Just remember this bit of wisdom -- if a girl is leading you on and jerking your chain left and right, don't ever think about moving on because she might want you back. And if you go on a date, she has the right to be pissy, especially when she decided, that very week, to break up with her boyfriend and go on a date with another guy she talks about constantly. Because you're her back up plan. Don't ever forget that. It's not manipulation. It's love, girls and boys.
3. Sydney
I liked Syd. Unfortunately, she's the placeholder girlfriend. Why Josh likes Emma over her, I have no fucking idea. Sydney is hot. Sydney is nice. Sydney is rich. And Sydney is way more interesting than Emma. In fact, I wanted to know the details of her relationship with Rick and what might have lead to her being the only girl in their class to stand up for No means No and Yes means Yes.
4. The Plot
Plot lines are mentioned and dropped like 2012 republican candidates. It's ridiculous. One moment, Josh is worried that his brother might be gay. The next? Nothing. One moment Emma think Kellan is pregnant. The next? Nothing. As for the main plot line? The only reason I finished this book was because I wanted to know if Emma would be unhappy in her future, and if Josh would move on. That's a piss poor way to keep the story moving.
5. The End
There was no end. It's like someone left out the third act because they were too lazy to finish writing the book. And I'm guilty of that. But I expect more from Printz honor authors and NYT Bestselling authors.
6. The Science, or Lack of
If you're reading this because you want a decent spec fic read, don't bother. This is a Degrassi special that desperately wants to fit in with the Animorphs.
This is why people don't like YA. Along with Across the Universe, this novel is everything that's wrong with the genre. Instead of focusing on, I dunno, the story, the characters, or, hell, an interesting romance, we're once again given a boring tale of Mr. And Mrs. White Teenager and their Oh So Dull First World Problems. Save yourself the effort. Just go watch The N.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Future of Us.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-50 of 70) (70 new)
message 1:
by
John
(new)
-
added it
Dec 16, 2011 12:39pm
NOOOOO D:
reply
|
flag
*
Wow... that's disappointing.Great review!
Palice wrote: "Wow... that's disappointing.Great review!
I answered b) to the first question, and then didn't know how to answer the rest! D:"
Smart answer. And thanks.
As long as you didn't answer d), we're cool.
Great review, Cory. The whole idea for this book just doesn't work for me. I could buy it if the present time took place after Facebook was invented and they happened to stumble upon their future selves' pages, but I can't wrap my head around Facebook appearing in 1996. For those who don't remember the internet from back then, here is an article. It's just unbelievable to me that they would even have known what they were looking at. Also, some of the programing language that Facebook uses hadn't even been invented yet so how would their computers even be able to read it. I think that there are too many scientific impossibilities to explain to make me buy this idea.
Lisa: YES! YES MY THOUGHTS EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I know that this is fiction, and all, but it needs to make some sense, and be loyal to facts and science.
Love this review. I couldn't figure out why Jose even wanted Emma...Sydney seemed a lot more interesting (and I wanted to know more about her character too!)
This review pretty much hit everything I was thinking without realizing it. Though I also thought the premise wasn't the best, but that's my fault for not reading the book summary for a group read. Nicely done!
Jennifer wrote: "Great review. Asher and Mackler need to read this, and then get started on rewriting the book."Hah. That's not a bad idea.
And thanks for the comments everyone.
Awesome review! I only read about 3/4 of the book before I realized how bored I was with it and that I actually didn't care about the future of any of the characters. I liked Josh but couldn't stand Emma or any of her stupid thoughts or choices.
Thanks for the review! I am going to avoid this book --- I am a HUGE fan of 13 Reasons Why but everything you said just makes me NOT want to read this.The premise sounds AMAZING! I am sad that they failed to make it fantastic.
Even though I didn't totally detest this book, I still agree with this review. Emma got on my nerves and she was pretty self absorbed. The only thing that I truly liked about it was Tyson.
I wanted to know more about Sydney too. But to be honest I do believe that Emma and Josh belonged together (excuse that please) for the simple fact that it made the reader happy. There was no actual substance to their 'relationship' because they spent the entire book at odds with each other. Yes there was the required sexual tension, however there was no real dynamic between the two, only a vague promise that there was one at some point.
I agree with a lot of your points about this book, but i can't say i agree with your opinion on across the universe. i loved that book!
ok, so i also haaaated this book, but i am decidedly not a teenager -- i'm more or less the same age as josh and emma would be in 2012. it is comforting to know that it isn't just that i'm not with it and actually all the kids are loving horrid books these days.i am mildly interested in knowing if the descriptions of being a teenager in the '90s -- no internet/cell phones to speak of -- seemed weird for teens today to contemplate. but this book didn't really do much to evoke that period beyond mentioning dave matthews and CD players every few pages.
I totally agree with Lisa's comment about what it was like in 1996. No way could FB have loaded on a dial-up connection, as spare as it is. The photos themselves would have frozen everything. The way things were in regard to cell phones, VCRs, technology, etc. was accurate. I am sure teens will be shocked at the 'primitive' conditions. But there you go. I agree with your conclusions about the novel and its weaknesses. Could have been done much better, could have been deeper, more intellectual. But they went for chick lit.
Cornmaven wrote: "The way things were in regard to cell phones, VCRs, technology, etc. was accurate."except they have DVDs available for rent a year before the machines were even test-marketed in the u.s.
I cannot agree enough with your review. There was no third act and a lot of issues are left unresolved. I didn't realized how sick I was of Emma until she looked up her step-sister. It was the first time she showed any concern about (the future of) anyone else besides herself. If she hadn't stumbled upon Josh's and Kellan's comments, she'd probably still be doing silly little things to get a better husband.
I totally agree. I was waiting the entire book for josh to say "Hmmmm.... Now that I think about it Emma is an ugly, vapid jerk who deserves the awful life she has. and you know Syndey is AMAZING!". I absolutley hated how in this book the mean girl gets the nice guy and the nice intresting girl gets...Nothing.
I agree with your review wholeheartedly. As a 90s teen, I was disappointed with the depiction of that time period. I now teach high school English and saw some similarities between the characters and my students, but on the whole the characterization was shallow. In other news: if my students could write like you do, I could die a very happy woman!
Allen wrote: "Emma obviously has her flaws, but it doesn't mean that she's a bad person. If Jay Asher and Carolyn Mackler made the characters so "perfect," people would still complain by saying the story's unrea..."I don't think you understand. Emma was a boring, one note brat. I don't care if she's a bad person. She's a bad character. If you think she's a good character, great. I don't care. She could be a child murdering, author kidnapping asshole for all I care. Hell, that might've made her more interesting than the boy crazy narcissist she was.
But, please, explain to me why it's so realistic to have a character do nothing but whine about their future husband when they have access to the future. Either she's a real dumbass, who's not worth reading about, or she's a bad character.
Cory wrote: "She could be a child murdering, author kidnapping asshole for all I care."I like how you put author-kidnapping right next to child-murdering.
Allen wrote: "I'm pretty sure you would have acted similarly to Emma if you were in her position."i would not have. i would have done much more research on other people in my life and the state of the world, and tried to figure out a way it could benefit me down the road, particularly financially.
i would not have overreacted to innocuous statements like "eating at [spouse's] favorite restaurant!" and taken them to mean that my future self was ready to slit
Allen wrote: "Cory wrote: "Allen wrote: "Emma obviously has her flaws, but it doesn't mean that she's a bad person. If Jay Asher and Carolyn Mackler made the characters so "perfect," people would still complain ..."And I'm a teenage girl who knows many teenage girls. None of them are as shallow and two-dimensional as Emma. She isn't a character. She's a cardboard cut out who thinks of nothing but boys.
I can tell you that I'm 100% positive that looking for my future husband isn't even in the first five things I'd do if I got a look into the future through the internet. That's all Emma did.
There's no "great" lesson in this book. There's an abrupt ending with Emma realizing that she needs to commit to her boyfriends and that'll solve everything. We didn't need Facebook of the Future for that. Already obsessed with your future husband? Now you should give more of yourself over to the guys you know now instead of realizing that you're a boy crazy, narcissist asshole.
yes! it was basically "focus on the guy you have, not the guy you might one day have."can't she focus on herself? her hopes and dreams outside of her husband/boyfriend? she didn't seem to give two shits about her career in any of the scenarios, except in the way they reflected upon her satisfaction in her future marriage. she didn't even care about being a marine biologist until she found out she became one in the future.
And why doesn't anyone remember how she rejected Josh FIRST then choose him like he was a sloppy second. and josh refered to Sydney as shallow, but didn't realise Emma was even worse?
Wow! I loved this review! I am still probably going to read it somewhere down the line because I will read anything and I did enjoy Thirteen Reasons Why. But at least I will have an idea of what to expect.
Allen wrote: "You can hate the character all you want, but you can't say there's no good lesson in this book. This book teaches you to focus on the present moment instead of worrying about the future. Hopefully, you got that out of reading the book. "You think I care about messages and lessons in books? If I wanted a message, or a teaching moment, I'd read the fucking bible. I read for entertainment. All I got out of this book was a waste of fifteen dollars. When I rated this two stars, I was very, very lenient.
I could've just watched the Degrassi finale, or hell, Arthur and Hey Arnold, for a message like that. At least it would've been free and less painful.
I could not have said it better myself. As a fan of 13 Reasons, I couldn't wait to read this book, but it turned out to be a huge disappointment.
Though Emma did get on my nerves from time to time, I completely disagree with the review. I personally adored this book. This book was very entertaining for me to read, and I kept thinking to myself how talented these authors must be! I also politely disagree with the character judgement, I found Sydney to be much more irritating than Emma, and I found Kellan to be just fine. Sure, she might've been a little naive or misguided, but aren't most teenagers? And besides, she was a good friend throughout the whole story, which made me actually care about her plot line. So, I politely disagree. I thought this book was wonderful, and I while I really do respect your opinion and your review, I think that maybe others should give it a try before completely dismissing it as garbage. I mean, there are 20 other four+ star reviews on this first page alone, next to 6 two- star ones.
the sound of Autumn wrote: "Though Emma did get on my nerves from time to time, I completely disagree with the review. I personally adored this book. This book was very entertaining for me to read, and I kept thinking to myse..."Great. Now write your own review in which you tell people to read it and not dismiss it as garbage. I'm not in control of anyone else, or their decisions. I'd like them not to waste money on it if they're expecting an awesome spec fic book with complex relationships, but they're very in control of their own wallets. I'm not going to tell them to read the book because they might like it. That would be pretty dishonest on my part and I'm not in the business of lying to sell books. I really didn't like this book, and from what I've presented, I don't really care if someone chooses to read it or dismiss it. They know what they like.
If you're looking for something like Degrassi, or as Joel above suggested, Saved by the Bell, you'll love this book. If you're looking for something in league with 13 Reasons Why, look away. Don't waste your time.
As for Sydney being more annoying than Emma, well I don't really get that. Why?
Why did you enjoy this? What talent did you see shining through the pages? Why did Emma's choices seem logical? And why was she a good friend?
Something about Sydney just urked me, there was nothing really special about her besides her looks and money. I enjoyed this because I found the plot interesting, and I actually found myself sucked into the story. Sure, Emma isn't perfect, but I don't consider her as awful as you guys are making it sound (and I mean that without any disrespect). And just the idea of two authors working on the same book intrigues me, and I think they pulled it off very well. So what it's not the greatest book ever written? I still think it was very much worth my time, and I'm noy lying just to sell the book. I believe in giving honest opions, and just like you're giving yours, I'm just giving mine.
I just finished this book about an hour ago, and came here to log my review and see what others had posted as well.Glad I'm not the only one disappointed in this book. As you said, it could have been EPIC. Definitely poorly executed.
the sound of Autumn wrote: "So what it's not the greatest book ever written? I still think it was very much worth my time, and I'm noy lying just to sell the book. I believe in giving honest opions, and just like you're giving yours, I'm just giving mine. "I'm glad you enjoyed it and found the plot fascinating. Once again, I did not. Therefore, for me to tell people to read it because they might like it would be like lying for me because the book is not what it says it is. As I said in the review, if you like teen dramas, you'll like this. But the blurb is false advertising.
I also just finished reading The Future of Us, and I had a couple of similar issues. For me the book was okay, although I felt like there were a lot of things they could have wrapped up much MUCH better. There's no follow up on Kellen and Tyson, we don't really get to see what happens with Josh and Emma or Josh and Sydney for that matter, and on the whole I felt like the book was too short. Additionally, I couldn't help but noticing the painful attempts to reinforce the fact that this was set in 1996. I can understand talking about the technology at the time but it seemed like they forced period-specific language into too many situations. For example we didn't need to know about them 'video taping' Seinfeld, or that Wayne's World only came out the year before. Every time something like that was put in it felt forced and unnecessary, and it really irked me. Like you, I had really high hopes for this book when I heard Asher had written another one. Thirteen Reasons why brought up some really interesting points on how what you do affects everyone even if you don't realise it, so naturally I was excited for the Future of Us especially as the idea sounded interesting. I was however fairly disappointed by the outcome, and I expect Asher to do a much better job next time.
Thank you for so eloquently phrasing some of the things that were bothering me about this book. I can forgive the Kellan strangeness and the lack of science, but the others were serious problems for me, as a reader.
Eh, the only problem I had was that they hardly know how Facebook works, hardly enough to find friends' pages, much less how to search politics or stocks. They did see career paths, they said they wouldn't search family as not to freak out over assumed death because the family member may not have a Facebook at all (and even then, she saw her sick half-sister would be okay), and who's not to say that some ripple would effect the Superbowl, etc? Otherwise I would agree, the format in itself was witty and awesomely sarcastic, but not exactly accurate/ fair to the story.
the sound of Autumn wrote: "and who's not to say that some ripple would effect the Superbowl, etc?"
But that's exactly my point. If you're smart enough to know that the superbowl outcome might change (highly unlikely in comparison to something as fickle as a relationship) then you should know that something like as who you're going to marry is even more prone to change. But my biggest problem is that they never even tried to see. Nothing but their love lives were explored. They were the most unimaginative, self-absorbed teens I've ever had the displeasure to read about.
And Facebook isn't really that difficult to use. I mean, my grandparents use it and they're very computer illiterate. You search "President" and the first thing that pops up is Bill Clinton. From there, you can find the other Presidents that he's friended and their respective vices. Then you search your favorite sports team to find out if they've won. Then you check out "Liked" pages, which are on your feed and various movies/technologies that will take off and invest in them. To be honest, I thought of all this stuff when I was twelve, writing a paper on what I'd do if I could time travel. But that was with an almanac, not Facebook, which gives you even more info.
To only have interest in your significant other is either a) highly unrealistic or b) completely selfishly stupid. Take your pick.










