David S. T.'s Reviews > Why We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith
Why We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith
by J. Anderson Thomson Jr., Clare Aukofer, Richard Dawkins (Goodreads Author)
by J. Anderson Thomson Jr., Clare Aukofer, Richard Dawkins (Goodreads Author)
David S. T.'s review
bookshelves: science, religion, read-in-2011, own
May 10, 11
bookshelves: science, religion, read-in-2011, own
Read from May 04 to 10, 2011
Warning: I got this book from the goodreads first-reads giveaway, but I don't think that influenced my rating.
I think the question of why do so many humans have an innate drawing towards religion is a good one and its one which this book attempts to answer. I can't tell how many times I've heard we have a God shaped hole in us, this desire for the supernatural. Basically this book views religion as misfires from our evolution, a “fast-food” mentality. Fast-food analogy is used because fatty / sweet foods were once valuable to us when food was more scarce but now days it just causes obesity and health problems, yet we still crave it. I'm a theist so I personally view this a little different, I think the question all boils down to your world view.
Another thing with this book, its definitely “a concise guide”. Expect a book covering this topic to be about the size of Harris's A Letter to a Christian Nation. I understand the want to keep the book accessible and short, but it also means that the topics and information is pretty brief. Of course since I'm assuming that was the idea, its not really its fault and it does provide an overview of the evolutionary cognitive neuroscience of religion.
One warning about the book (which I should have assumed before I started), this book is mostly just another new atheist book written due to the Sept 11, terrorist attacks. I should have guessed as much with the introduction from Dawkins, the fact that its listed as religion instead of science or the dedication to his grandson “in hopes that he will grow up in a world freer of religion's destructiveness”. The author hopes one day that the “evolutionary cognitive neuroscience of religion” will be taught in public school biology classes and he welcomes the legal actions and new scopes trials. I do wish the author would put have had less of a 4 order intensionality of atheism in this book where he wants the reader to believe all religion is bad and atheism is the only way out (I do agree that sometimes fundamentalism can be bad).
I think the question of why do so many humans have an innate drawing towards religion is a good one and its one which this book attempts to answer. I can't tell how many times I've heard we have a God shaped hole in us, this desire for the supernatural. Basically this book views religion as misfires from our evolution, a “fast-food” mentality. Fast-food analogy is used because fatty / sweet foods were once valuable to us when food was more scarce but now days it just causes obesity and health problems, yet we still crave it. I'm a theist so I personally view this a little different, I think the question all boils down to your world view.
Another thing with this book, its definitely “a concise guide”. Expect a book covering this topic to be about the size of Harris's A Letter to a Christian Nation. I understand the want to keep the book accessible and short, but it also means that the topics and information is pretty brief. Of course since I'm assuming that was the idea, its not really its fault and it does provide an overview of the evolutionary cognitive neuroscience of religion.
One warning about the book (which I should have assumed before I started), this book is mostly just another new atheist book written due to the Sept 11, terrorist attacks. I should have guessed as much with the introduction from Dawkins, the fact that its listed as religion instead of science or the dedication to his grandson “in hopes that he will grow up in a world freer of religion's destructiveness”. The author hopes one day that the “evolutionary cognitive neuroscience of religion” will be taught in public school biology classes and he welcomes the legal actions and new scopes trials. I do wish the author would put have had less of a 4 order intensionality of atheism in this book where he wants the reader to believe all religion is bad and atheism is the only way out (I do agree that sometimes fundamentalism can be bad).
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Why We Believe in God(s).
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Cassandra
(new)
May 10, 2011 06:43am
Interested to know how this one goes.
reply
|
flag
*

