Sarah's Reviews > In the Woods
In the Woods (Dublin Murder Squad, #1)
by Tana French
by Tana French
** spoiler alert **
This gets 4 stars for being not only quite well written, but completely page turning. It's like an Irish Law and Order SVU but with some really excellent prose. Tana French is indeed a very good writer, I commend her on this debut novel and I would most definitely read her next book, when she writes it.
That being said, (SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS!!!), I guessed who was responsible for the murder pretty early on. This is pretty routine for me (no, I would never succeed at having a career as a detective or pathologist or anything like that), but with a few minor exceptions (example - 'Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn') I tend to guess these things right away because I read a lot of mysteries and I watch a lot of cop shows and the writers all tend to follow the same pattern, which is not rocket science.
I did, however, think French gave a few too many clues and I found myself yelling at Detective Ryan for being so dim witted and gullible not to catch on. Then I was angry on page 409 when Ryan basically assumes the reader is as dense as he is. Very condescending. I hate when film and books underestimate the reader/viewer. Once I had guessed the killer, I avidly read page after page to see if I was right but more importantly I read this book so eagerly because Ryan seemed like such a sketchy character that I was waiting to see if he was responsible for the disappearance of Peter and Jamie. Alas, *that* case was left unsolved. Maybe French will write a sequel, and we'll finally get an answer to that cold case.
This book would make a fantastic film. I'm sure it's already being optioned as I type this :)
That being said, (SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS!!!), I guessed who was responsible for the murder pretty early on. This is pretty routine for me (no, I would never succeed at having a career as a detective or pathologist or anything like that), but with a few minor exceptions (example - 'Sharp Objects by Gillian Flynn') I tend to guess these things right away because I read a lot of mysteries and I watch a lot of cop shows and the writers all tend to follow the same pattern, which is not rocket science.
I did, however, think French gave a few too many clues and I found myself yelling at Detective Ryan for being so dim witted and gullible not to catch on. Then I was angry on page 409 when Ryan basically assumes the reader is as dense as he is. Very condescending. I hate when film and books underestimate the reader/viewer. Once I had guessed the killer, I avidly read page after page to see if I was right but more importantly I read this book so eagerly because Ryan seemed like such a sketchy character that I was waiting to see if he was responsible for the disappearance of Peter and Jamie. Alas, *that* case was left unsolved. Maybe French will write a sequel, and we'll finally get an answer to that cold case.
This book would make a fantastic film. I'm sure it's already being optioned as I type this :)
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read In the Woods.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-4 of 4) (4 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Sheila
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Feb 11, 2010 02:28pm
I too was annoyed with the arrogance of Ryan suggesting that we, the audience, couldn't guess that Roselind was twisted. It was pretty obvious something was messed up with her from intro.
reply
|
flag
*
I also found myself saying (aloud): "NO! I knew it was Rosalind!" but I don't think it was arrogance. I think it was more evidence of Ryan's complete lack of understanding about relationships. I think he was fooling himself, and needed to believe that his "listeners" would also fall in the same traps. What was fascinating was that he empathized with Cassie's experience with the psychopath in college, but missed all those clues in his own relationship with Rosalind. So, I didn't read it as arrogance, just really really really disconnected.


