Gregory Mone's Reviews > The Naive and the Sentimental Novelist

The Naive and the Sentimental Novelist by Orhan Pamuk

by
5221314
's review
Mar 28, 12

Read from April 05, 2011 to March 21, 2012

A wonderful book for a writer or a lover of literature. Pamuk makes some really enlightening points about narration and the fundamental role of the novel. I wish the book had somehow captured the feeling of the original lectures, though. Particularly the Q&A sessions at the end of each one. I was lucky enough to attend five out of the six lectures at Harvard, and it was interesting to see how Pamuk responded to the questions. At one point a student admitted that she skipped the descriptions in his books, and others, and you could tell he was livid.

I'm torn on this whole issue of the novel having a secret center, though. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seems to me that he's saying every novel has a kind of objective secret center. Readers read in search of this center. And the writer writes with the same aim in mind. I'd argue that a great novel has many of these "centers" - ie, the writer might think the book is about one thing, while readers find other centers. That's been my experience, anyway. I think I know what my books are about, and then readers find entirely different meanings and themes. But hey, what do I know.


Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Naive and the Sentimental Novelist.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-1 of 1) (1 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Mmars (new) - rated it 4 stars

Mmars I'm reading this right now (read the first 2 lectures) and I didn't havethe impression that he implies every novel has a secret center. So I went back and reread a bit. I'll quote what he says on pg. 24-25. "What sets novels apart from other literary narratives is that they have a secret center. Or, more precisely, they rely on our conviction that there is a center we should search for as we read." So, it seems, it's subjective. The secret center phrase is intriguing. I'd never thought of it that way. But when discussing books with others don't those discussions often lead to what the book was about, really about, deep-down about? I think I agree with him, novels, great and true novels, do have this, otherwise what would there be to discuss, analyze and write about. I guess that sentence sort of re-enforces your point out many centers. And again, what do I know either?


back to top