Vinaya's Reviews > The Girl in the Steel Corset
The Girl in the Steel Corset (Steampunk Chronicles, #1)
by Kady Cross
by Kady Cross
Vinaya's review
bookshelves: books-i-hated, could-have-been-better, jeez-they-ll-publish-anything, maybe-when-i-m-desperate, romance, ya-fantasy
Apr 05, 11
bookshelves: books-i-hated, could-have-been-better, jeez-they-ll-publish-anything, maybe-when-i-m-desperate, romance, ya-fantasy
Read from March 23 to April 04, 2011
OhthankyouGodJesusit'sfinallyover!!!! Phew! Reading this book was a constant battle against narcolepsy.

The Girl in the Steel Corset pretty much embodies everything that is wrong with YA today. It's all about the packaging, and nothing to do with substance. This book had one of the most attention-grabbing titles I have seen this year; the cover moves beyond pretty into a new realm of gorgeous (notice the little clockwork design on the wallpaper? so awesome!); and it has a very enticing blurb/synopsis that gives no hint of the load of meh waiting inside.
So this is supposed to be a steampunk novel. This is supposed to be a steampunk novel for young adults. This is supposed to be a steampunk novel for young adults revolving around murder, conspiracies and mechanical mayhem.

Yeah, I'm still waiting on that order...
So there's an ill-treated serving girl who runs away from this rich aristocrat who tries to molest her. She runs straight into the arms of a richer, handsome, personable and kind-hearted duke. Said duke thinks she's gorgeous, but she has some 'issues' he needs to help her overcome before they can be together. One of the obstacles to the path of true love is some evil guy planning to take over the world, but more importantly, well... there's this other guy...

This book frustrates me because it had so much potential! It could have been YA's heaven-sent answer to Clockwork Angel. But no. Instead, it's just a historical romance with a bit of mechanical robots thrown in. And a very childish mystery that even my toddler would have rejected. And a completely pointless and unnecessary love triangle. And a sacrilegious dumbing-down of one of the coolest horror stories ever- yes, ladies and gentlemen, our heroine is the DAUGHTER of Dr.Jekyll and Mr.Hyde. And she's boring!!!

This gif has more personality than Finley Jayne
This book is riddled with inconsistencies. For example, Finley dresses in short pants, she spends the night unchaperoned at a single man's house, she learns kung-fu with some shirtless guy, yet when the hero wants to show her his tattoo, she wants to remind him that it's 'improper' to unbutton his shirt in front of a lady! O-kay, then.
The love triangle is ridiculous and ridiculously clichéd. There's the virtuous and boring hero, the interesting-but-strangely-accommodative crime lord who's secretly supah-sensitive despite his bad boy image. Finley, of course, is torn between these two cardboard cutouts and cannot for the life of her choose between these two handsome, dashing men who are so far out of her league that she ought not to be entertaining any fantasies about them anyway. Bad boy Jack Dandy is apparently a well-educated plummy type who affects a Cockney accent for some unfathomable reason. He plays NO role in the book except as the additional love interest, an angle that this already-terrible book could have done without.
I don't generally rave about the show-don't-tell rule, because I like descriptive writing, as long as it is done well. 'Done well' being the operative phrase here. This book just tells and tells and tells without ever getting interesting. The secondary characters are weirdly flat, except for best-friend Sam, who is just TSTL. It's not often that I see a male TSTL character, so kudos to the author for not being restrained by gender biases!
As mentioned before the mystery/thriller aspect of the story is handled clumsily. It's as if the author wanted to focus on the romance, but forced herself to shove some mystery into the plot so that the book wouldn't get shelved in the romance section.
I guess the steampunk aspect of this novel wasn't completely hideous. Just a little too convenient. There were too many modern devices that made an appearance, only instead of being battery-powered they were steam-powered. I liked the concept of the Organites, a sort of mysterious organism that is speculated as being the source of life, but they were just sort of introduced and never explained properly. Neither was the magic, or the group's strange abilities, or even Finley's integration of her light and dark sides. Basically, every interesting thing in this book was left dangling while we pursued the boring hero and heroine through their boring lives.
I really had to force myself to finish this book, because I feel a sort of moral obligation not to abandon ARCs. If I had bought this book, believe you me, I would have abandoned it a hundred pages in, and never looked back. The writing is a weird mixture of too modern, forcedly Victorian and strangely idiomatic. It doesn't gel well at all! My recommendation? Don't bother!
Disclosure: This book was provided to me by the publishers via Net Galley. No external considerations affected this review.

The Girl in the Steel Corset pretty much embodies everything that is wrong with YA today. It's all about the packaging, and nothing to do with substance. This book had one of the most attention-grabbing titles I have seen this year; the cover moves beyond pretty into a new realm of gorgeous (notice the little clockwork design on the wallpaper? so awesome!); and it has a very enticing blurb/synopsis that gives no hint of the load of meh waiting inside.
So this is supposed to be a steampunk novel. This is supposed to be a steampunk novel for young adults. This is supposed to be a steampunk novel for young adults revolving around murder, conspiracies and mechanical mayhem.

Yeah, I'm still waiting on that order...
So there's an ill-treated serving girl who runs away from this rich aristocrat who tries to molest her. She runs straight into the arms of a richer, handsome, personable and kind-hearted duke. Said duke thinks she's gorgeous, but she has some 'issues' he needs to help her overcome before they can be together. One of the obstacles to the path of true love is some evil guy planning to take over the world, but more importantly, well... there's this other guy...

This book frustrates me because it had so much potential! It could have been YA's heaven-sent answer to Clockwork Angel. But no. Instead, it's just a historical romance with a bit of mechanical robots thrown in. And a very childish mystery that even my toddler would have rejected. And a completely pointless and unnecessary love triangle. And a sacrilegious dumbing-down of one of the coolest horror stories ever- yes, ladies and gentlemen, our heroine is the DAUGHTER of Dr.Jekyll and Mr.Hyde. And she's boring!!!

This gif has more personality than Finley Jayne
This book is riddled with inconsistencies. For example, Finley dresses in short pants, she spends the night unchaperoned at a single man's house, she learns kung-fu with some shirtless guy, yet when the hero wants to show her his tattoo, she wants to remind him that it's 'improper' to unbutton his shirt in front of a lady! O-kay, then.
The love triangle is ridiculous and ridiculously clichéd. There's the virtuous and boring hero, the interesting-but-strangely-accommodative crime lord who's secretly supah-sensitive despite his bad boy image. Finley, of course, is torn between these two cardboard cutouts and cannot for the life of her choose between these two handsome, dashing men who are so far out of her league that she ought not to be entertaining any fantasies about them anyway. Bad boy Jack Dandy is apparently a well-educated plummy type who affects a Cockney accent for some unfathomable reason. He plays NO role in the book except as the additional love interest, an angle that this already-terrible book could have done without.
I don't generally rave about the show-don't-tell rule, because I like descriptive writing, as long as it is done well. 'Done well' being the operative phrase here. This book just tells and tells and tells without ever getting interesting. The secondary characters are weirdly flat, except for best-friend Sam, who is just TSTL. It's not often that I see a male TSTL character, so kudos to the author for not being restrained by gender biases!
As mentioned before the mystery/thriller aspect of the story is handled clumsily. It's as if the author wanted to focus on the romance, but forced herself to shove some mystery into the plot so that the book wouldn't get shelved in the romance section.
I guess the steampunk aspect of this novel wasn't completely hideous. Just a little too convenient. There were too many modern devices that made an appearance, only instead of being battery-powered they were steam-powered. I liked the concept of the Organites, a sort of mysterious organism that is speculated as being the source of life, but they were just sort of introduced and never explained properly. Neither was the magic, or the group's strange abilities, or even Finley's integration of her light and dark sides. Basically, every interesting thing in this book was left dangling while we pursued the boring hero and heroine through their boring lives.
I really had to force myself to finish this book, because I feel a sort of moral obligation not to abandon ARCs. If I had bought this book, believe you me, I would have abandoned it a hundred pages in, and never looked back. The writing is a weird mixture of too modern, forcedly Victorian and strangely idiomatic. It doesn't gel well at all! My recommendation? Don't bother!
Disclosure: This book was provided to me by the publishers via Net Galley. No external considerations affected this review.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Girl in the Steel Corset.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 03/23/2011 |
|
15.0% | "No, no, noooo! No love triangle, pleeease! :(" | |
| 03/24/2011 |
|
30.0% | "Dear Finley, I'm very sorry but you're nowhere close to being interesting enough to hold my attention when I have an ARC of The Queen of the Dead in my hands! I'll come back to you eventually, I promise!" | |
| 04/03/2011 |
|
30.0% | "Okay, I will give you ONE more chance, but if you don't buck up and get interesting, we're done!!!" 3 comments |
Comments (showing 1-50 of 63) (63 new)
message 1:
by
Anthi
(new)
-
added it
Mar 23, 2011 01:50am
I hope you'll post comments, I want to read this one so I'll wait and see if you like it.
reply
|
flag
*
Request it again! They rejected me the first time I requested it, but then I asked for it again and they gave it to me! No harm in trying, right? :)
Go to "Browse Catalog by Recent" and type "Steel" into search and it should pop up as the first result. :) (At least it does for me!)
Since you got the ARC, you might as well try it! But if you find yourself falling asleep a quarter of the way through, you'll know it's not worth it, and then you can just give up! :)
Vinaya, I just read your review (I guess I commented too early, ha) and thank you for it! I'll definitely steer clear of this one. Such a shame for a great idea and beautiful cover to be wasted on this!
Aww, so sad you didn't like it! Lots of bloggers are dying to read this. Now, I don't know what to think.
I liked your review, though I felt a little differently, but I can see your points too. I didn't have to think too much while reading this novel, and I thought the steampunk aspects were cool, if not fully flushed out. I hated the Triangle between Her, Jack and Griff.
I agree about the historical inaccuracies, but I chalked it up to writer choice, and it didn't bother me as a reader. Of course woman in 1815 or whatever weren't wearing pants! But I sort of took it as an alternate 1800's than the one that actually existed =)
The organites were very cool, and I too wished they were talked about more.
Sam was TSTL. I wanted to thwap him repeatedly.
The cover is gorgeous! I liked Emily. and Cordelia.
Also wanted to say that I don't read much YA, I generally can't stand teenage angst and love issues. I lived it once, don't want to do it again :grins:so take my review with a grain of salt.
I was fine with the fact that she wore pants (although, you know, that's a pretty HUGE historical discrepancy because of Queen Victoria's excessively rigid rules on decorum and chastity). The thing was, if it was okay for her to wear pants and fight with that Renn guy when he was shirtless, why would it NOT be okay for Griffin to take off his shirt to show her his tattoo? She's been so improper all along, it just seems weird that she'd suddenly start thinking of propriety.
I agree about the inconsistencies. I should note them. Also, was it me, or were they written to sound like adults, but Griff was a Duke and he wasn't even 21, neither was the nefarious Dandy. Gee, how old was Finely anyways, we were never told. Oye. See this is what's wrong with me, I give YA too much leeway
Lol, are you going to go back and deduct a star? ;-) And yes, they did sound too adult, though adulthood came earlier back then. Still, I think they were all between 16 and 19, which makes their characterization ridiculous!
Yup, I did. I think I read it so fast, and then went on to another book, I might have just absorbed the issues, and just forgot about them. oops.
After reading your review, I spend over five minutes staring at that hand drumming its fingers. I so want one. It's hypnotic.BTW, you just hit (what for me, anyway, is) the right amount of snarkiness for a review. That coupled with the proper use of demotivationals makes it a WIN.
Oh god, I think you just hit on why I judge YA books so harshly. I KNOW that I shouldn't fall for the trap of trying to analyze a book too much - let pop-fic be pop-fic, right? WRONG. Back when we were kids, there was no such category called YA. We read classics and adult fiction straight through, and we learned themes through osmosis. The YAs really aren't doing much in this regard. I mean, come on, if this book is a thinly veiled romance, why don't teens just grab the romances and be done with it? Heck, that's what we did :P I really don't want to comment on the 'daughter of Dr. J & H'. That's wrong on soooo many levels - at least make her interesting, dammit.
Another fantastic review. But after I'm done with the 5-6 books I have to read, I'll be digging around your YA reviews to gobble a few up. I need to keep in touch with the rest of the world :P
Vinaya wrote: "It's worse than my worst nightmares. Don't fall for The Cover Trap, Annika! :)"LOL at this comment.I'm going to start saying that.
Oh, and I mailed you another postcard today.
Yay! Postcaaarrddd! I want to send you one, too, but I can't find a cool enough postcard! As soon as I find the right one, it'll be headed States-side! :)
I appreciate you taking the time to review this book, and as the author I'm not going to argue any of the points you've made. I do feel you missed some of the points of the book, and I'd like to think that most readers will check the book out for themselves and decide if they want to read it. Obviously my writing is not to your taste, and that's cool. Perhaps you'll like the 2nd book better. OR not. :-)
Kady/Kathryn, thank you for your comment, but I hope you won't take it badly if I let you know that I am very uncomfortable with the idea of having an author comment on my review of her book. I'm sorry you think I missed points of your book, and while I have encouraged people who have received copies of your book to judge for themselves, the point of my review is also to act as a guideline for people with similar tastes. If and when I make a recommendation regarding your book, it is understood that it will only be accepted by people who already know and trust my judgement. In fact, since this is pretty much the point of Goodreads, I find your exhortation to people to judge for themselves both unnecessary and derogatory to the value of my review. In conclusion, upon advice from several other Goodreaders, I would like to point you in the direction of this truly excellent article by YA author Phoebe North; I think it might prove enlightening.
Thank you so much for reviewing this book because you saved me from it! It hits most of my pet peeves, judging from what you said, and I need a break from those for a while. I've got so many books I'm sure I'll like waiting for me that I don't know why I should bother with ones I'm sure I won't like.(Plus, I'm a little iffy with steampunk. I made an attempt at one steampunk book and never finished it because I got bored.)
I apologize for making you uncomfortable -- wasn't my intention. I know a lot of people don't think authors should respond to reviews, but I've always thought of Goodreads as an informal site.
I may steer clear of this book although looking at the publisher, I'm not surprised that this is steampunk light and romance heavy
Okay, I've deleted the author's comment from this thread because I really, really don't like the idea that she came back on my thread even after I told her it made me (and others) uncomfortable. If you want to see her response to L (Sniffly Kitty), please click the spoiler button below. (view spoiler)
Also, I think it is perfectly justified for people to judge a book by the publisher. I, for example, would never pick up a Thomas Nelson book, because I know their fiction is Christian-based. I really don't think anybody has the right to come on and tell someone they cannot hold whatever opinions they want to about the books they buy, and who they buy them from!
You know what's funny? There was some Sleeping Beauty adaptation a few months ago that turned out to be Christian fiction, and when reviewers stated that they were disappointed by the sudden appearance of religious themes, they were told they "should have known it was a Christian publisher." Well, no, I had never heard of the publisher, and I bet a lot of other non-Christian readers haven't either. So somehow we're supposed to be discerning about the publisher in some cases but not in others. *eyeroll*That said, I've actually had good opinions of most of the Harlequin Teen books, Goddess Test aside (and I haven't read Steel Corset). They do the Soul Screamers series, which I like, and several other books I've really enjoyed. I find that they're really polished in terms of grammar/editing--which is more rare than it should be--and that the stories tend to not be agonizingly long. LOL.
I am not a fan of the Soul Screamer series, but I agree, Harlequin Teen does sometimes have good stuff; for example, I really like Julie Kagawa. That being said, though, I can't remember a single book published by HT that doesn't have a solid romantic plot. It's their trademark, why would they not cash in on it?!
True. They do usually have at least some romance--just not any more than what is usual for YA paranormal. If that makes any sense.I like Julie Kagawa too. :)
Christian Sleeping Beauty? Hoo boy...I see no way that can go wrong. >.>Considering how publishers have patterns in what they publish and how they edit, and that some of them specialize in certain genres, I'd think the publisher is something you should judge by. Just not necessarily the only thing.
Considering how publishers have patterns in what they publish and how they edit, and that some of them specialize in certain genres, I'd think the publisher is something you should judge by. Just not necessarily the only thing. Exactly.
I love YA books so I do hope that people don't read this and then disregard the genre because there are some great YA books out there. This is not one of those!I am so glad that I am not alone in my thoughts about this book!
I recommended this book to friends. I thought that it had a good plot with good characters. Yes, the title is eye catching, but it's because it's just a good title. And it's not like there wasn't a steel corset in the book.These kind of reviews are what put people off of YA, when this book was amazing. The package in important in publishing, but to the author, who has no say in that, just cares about the book. And if people will like it. If people will like the characters and the plots and the details they ad in.
"These kind of reviews are what put people off of YA, when this book was amazing." --> If you'd look at Vinaya's profile you'd notice it's not as if she bashes all YA books. Some YA books are just not good. I haven't read this one so I can't pass judgment on this particular case. But you're saying people are "put off" YA books just because they see a negative review of a YA book? There are plenty of negative reviews for adult books as well. And as for the rest of your comment ... Yes, the author has no control over the packaging of his/her book (besides signing a contract with the publisher) but I don't see why that's relevant––especially since, from what I gather from Vinaya's review, she liked the packaging more than the contents of the book.
♥ Brigid ♥ {Lion Hearted Girl} wrote: ""These kind of reviews are what put people off of YA, when this book was amazing." --> If you'd look at Vinaya's profile you'd notice it's not as if she bashes all YA books. Some YA books are just ..."That's not what I meant. I was talking about when she said that "this is what's wrong with YA." that kind of attitude is what I was talking about. That there is something terribly wring with YA, when there isn't, at least I can't find it. And I know she said she liked the packaging, but it was also like she was saying the package lied or was being deceptive. (The packaging is amazing, that's not what I meant.)
Sorry, I should of clarified better what I meant. I probably should write comments at 1 in the morning without triple checking them.









