Martine's Reviews > Atonement
Atonement
by Ian McEwan
by Ian McEwan
Martine's review
bookshelves: british, favourites, historical-fiction, film, modern-fiction, family-drama
Feb 16, 08
bookshelves: british, favourites, historical-fiction, film, modern-fiction, family-drama
Read in February, 2008
Having recently seen and loved the magnificent film adaptation, I decided to reread Atonement, which quite impressed me when it was first published. And guess what? It was an even more rewarding experience the second time around. Knowing what was coming -- knowing the plot twist at the end -- helped me focus on the quality of the writing rather than on the development of the story, and as always, McEwan's prose completely sucked me in. He is, quite simply, one of the most talented authors alive, and he uses his gift to great effect here.
I'm not really going to go into the plot here, because the less the first-time reader knows about the book, the better. Suffice it to say that it is about an imaginative thirteen-year-old who witnesses a few things she doesn't understand, draws the wrong conclusions and ends up ruining the lives of two people near and dear to her. The first half of the book deals with the event itself and the hours leading up to it; the second half deals with her attempts to, well, deal with it -- atone for it, so to speak.
As always, McEwan excels at setting the scene. His description of a hot summer afternoon in a 1935 English country house is lush and sumptuous, his evocation of a young soldier's struggle to reach home after the disastrous 1940 battle of Dunkirk is haunting, and his look into the horrors of a war-time London hospital is gruesome in all its detail. Amazingly, McEwan manages to find beauty even in the most horrific scenes, which is one of the things which set him apart as a writer. As usual, though, it's the psychological stuff that is really outstanding. McEwan has a knack for taking his readers deep into his characters' minds, letting them share their most intimate, most uncomfortable thoughts and feelings. Sometimes these thoughts are a little disturbing (those of you who have read his earlier works will know what I mean), but usually they have the effect of completely drawing the reader into the story. The latter is definitely the case in Atonement. By presenting the story from different perspectives and vantage points, McEwan provides the reader with a complete and engrossing view of a life-changing event and its aftermath. All the different perspectives ring true, and together they tell a marvellous tale of perception, loyalty, anger, secrets, lost love, shame, guilt, obsession with the past and -- yes -- atonement. And about writing, for more than anything else, Atonement is about the difference between fiction and reality, the power of the imagination and the human urge to write and rewrite history -- to write destiny and play God.
I've heard quite a few people say that they found the first half of the novel too slow and ponderous, wondering why McEwan felt the need to devote nearly two hundred pages to the events of a single day. Personally, I found that part of the book to be utterly brilliant in its rich, Woolf-like glory. As far as I'm concerned, the atmosphere of the first half is superbly drawn, with each character down to the most minor one being well realised and the tensions and suspense at work almost being made tangible. For me, it is the second half of the book which has problems (albeit minor ones), in that I found the jumps in time and perspective jarring and the (otherwise fascinating) chapter about Robbie's adventures in France somewhat unreal. Of course, there are good reasons for the slightly unreal quality of the Dunkirk chapter (which the film captured just brilliantly), but still, it didn't quite work for me; it felt a bit out of place. Thankfully, though, the rest of the book worked just wonderfully for me. Like other McEwan books, it left me with a haunting question -- 'What if...?'
As for McEwan's impressive insight into the mind of a thirteen-year-old girl, which other reviewers have called scary, I think that has everything to do with Briony's being a writer. She is hardly your average thirteen-year-old (I think even McEwan would have a hard time coming up with one of those!); rather she is a writer (a good one), and that, of course, is something McEwan knows all about. As a fellow writer, I greatly enjoyed seeing the world through Briony's eyes, and hope her author will live to her old age and write as many good books as he has her doing.
I'm not really going to go into the plot here, because the less the first-time reader knows about the book, the better. Suffice it to say that it is about an imaginative thirteen-year-old who witnesses a few things she doesn't understand, draws the wrong conclusions and ends up ruining the lives of two people near and dear to her. The first half of the book deals with the event itself and the hours leading up to it; the second half deals with her attempts to, well, deal with it -- atone for it, so to speak.
As always, McEwan excels at setting the scene. His description of a hot summer afternoon in a 1935 English country house is lush and sumptuous, his evocation of a young soldier's struggle to reach home after the disastrous 1940 battle of Dunkirk is haunting, and his look into the horrors of a war-time London hospital is gruesome in all its detail. Amazingly, McEwan manages to find beauty even in the most horrific scenes, which is one of the things which set him apart as a writer. As usual, though, it's the psychological stuff that is really outstanding. McEwan has a knack for taking his readers deep into his characters' minds, letting them share their most intimate, most uncomfortable thoughts and feelings. Sometimes these thoughts are a little disturbing (those of you who have read his earlier works will know what I mean), but usually they have the effect of completely drawing the reader into the story. The latter is definitely the case in Atonement. By presenting the story from different perspectives and vantage points, McEwan provides the reader with a complete and engrossing view of a life-changing event and its aftermath. All the different perspectives ring true, and together they tell a marvellous tale of perception, loyalty, anger, secrets, lost love, shame, guilt, obsession with the past and -- yes -- atonement. And about writing, for more than anything else, Atonement is about the difference between fiction and reality, the power of the imagination and the human urge to write and rewrite history -- to write destiny and play God.
I've heard quite a few people say that they found the first half of the novel too slow and ponderous, wondering why McEwan felt the need to devote nearly two hundred pages to the events of a single day. Personally, I found that part of the book to be utterly brilliant in its rich, Woolf-like glory. As far as I'm concerned, the atmosphere of the first half is superbly drawn, with each character down to the most minor one being well realised and the tensions and suspense at work almost being made tangible. For me, it is the second half of the book which has problems (albeit minor ones), in that I found the jumps in time and perspective jarring and the (otherwise fascinating) chapter about Robbie's adventures in France somewhat unreal. Of course, there are good reasons for the slightly unreal quality of the Dunkirk chapter (which the film captured just brilliantly), but still, it didn't quite work for me; it felt a bit out of place. Thankfully, though, the rest of the book worked just wonderfully for me. Like other McEwan books, it left me with a haunting question -- 'What if...?'
As for McEwan's impressive insight into the mind of a thirteen-year-old girl, which other reviewers have called scary, I think that has everything to do with Briony's being a writer. She is hardly your average thirteen-year-old (I think even McEwan would have a hard time coming up with one of those!); rather she is a writer (a good one), and that, of course, is something McEwan knows all about. As a fellow writer, I greatly enjoyed seeing the world through Briony's eyes, and hope her author will live to her old age and write as many good books as he has her doing.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Atonement.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-10 of 10) (10 new)
date
newest »
newest »
Seems you and I felt exactly the same way about the film. I, too, was sceptical going in. However, I knew two minutes into the film that they had got it right. Everything about Briony, the twins and Lola was just perfect. By the time Robbie was writing his letter I was hugely impressed, and when the Dunkirk beach scene began, my jaw was on the floor. You're right, that tracking shot has to rank among the greatest achievements in the history of cinema. The singing soldiers blew me away. For me, that was the greatest moment of the film. But really, the whole scene was staggeringly impressive. And straight from the book, as I discovered upon rereading it.What I really loved about the film was how, rather than moving from one dialogue to the next, the script allows the characters to be alone with their thoughts. The silences, the long looks, the quiet little smiles... there is something marvellously intimate about them, which is all the more remarkable given the epic scope of the rest of the film. I think they came up with the perfect combination of epic and intimate. And as you were saying, the cinematography was fabulous. I hope it will translate to a small screen, as well, as I definitely intend to buy the DVD when it is released.
I'm now very much looking forward to the movie - thanks Martine and Carolyn. And I think I'll re-read it then afterwards, too. "Atonement" is my hands-up fav novel from the past 10 years (or more!)
You're welcome, Carol! I hope you get a chance to see the film on a big screen, as that's really where it ought to be seen. The cinematography is so good... Anyhow, enjoy the experience. I'm sure you'll be just as impressed as I was!
Why, thank you, Anca! That's very nice to hear. I'm glad you enjoyed it. :-)(Am I making wild assumptions when I say 'Mulţumesc şi cu plăcere'?)
I learned Romanian many years ago when I was a gymnastics junkie and desperately wanted to become a gymnastics coach in Romania. I've since let go of that dream. I've forgotten half of my Romanian, but I still recognise a Romanian name when I see one. :-)
Oh, Martine !!!I am so sorry.The recreation of the first section of the book in the film was brilliant.Unfortunately the first section of the book itself was not and it degenerated swiftly after that.
The best thing about the dreadful movie based on the even more dreadful book was that it was mercifully SHORTER!!!
Anyone who writes about a young girl eating chocolate thus:"It cracked loudly and yielded to her unblemished incisors."is NOT a master of English prose and worse is doing a disservice to chocolate.
I'd sum up this pastiche of going-nowhere pseudo-literatute as: An Agatha Christie whodunnit onto which is tacked a poor man's version of "War and Peace" with a summary of the 1940 British Manual for Trainee Nurses.As for the pathetic very pseudo'atonement'...if some one who had wrecked my life wrote a story about me when I was dead and supplied a happy ending, would it in any way effect me ?
Ian has done much better. Bury this one.Try Chesil Beach.
Wayne,Sydney Australia.



But while they can't let us in on every thought and feeling, the performances certainly convey the psychological complexity of the characters, and the cinematography throughout is simply gorgeous. My favorite thing about the film is the breathtaking five-minute shot of the beach at Dunkirk, which in one single, uninterrupted take weaves us through the mass of men gathered there, encompassing so many different emotions so gracefully and powerfully. Surely one of the great long shots in the history of cinema.
I also got a kick out of how at times the score incorporates the clack-clack-clacking of a typewriter. That was a nice touch.