Alex's Reviews > Wuthering Heights

Wuthering Heights by Emily Brontë

by
3144945
's review
Jun 23, 11

bookshelves: 2011, reading-through-history, particularly-drunk-reviews
Read from June 22 to 23, 2011

** spoiler alert ** Well, that was a surprise. Like the writer of the Penguin edition's preface, I had been under the impression that Wuthering Heights was a great love story. Instead it's a great hate story. A likable - even tolerable - character doesn't show up before Catherine junior (we'll call her Cathy); until then we have to negotiate the milquetoast Edgar, the narcissistic and mentally unstable Catherine, the nurse Ellen, who makes Juliet's nurse look like an angel, and, of course, Heathcliff, who is possibly possessed by a demon.

Toward the end of the book we get a mirror image of the Catherine / Heathcliff relationship in Cathy and Hareton. Cathy has Edgar's sweetness and Catherine's spirit, which turns out to be a pretty good mix; and although Heathcliff tries to turn Hareton into himself, since Hareton is not possessed by a demon he just turns out rugged. While Cathy can be impetuous and cruel, like when she says "He's just like a dog...or a cart-horse" (Ch. 32), Hareton refuses to take her bait. Cathy isn't as nuts as her mother, but still, I think the point here is that Catherine might have had a chance at happiness, but was destroyed by Heathcliff's malice.

I can see why a book about awful people destroying each other might turn some folks off. But I like my coffee black, so I loved every minute of it. This is a book that knows fiercely what it is.

Whether I know what it is is another question. Wuthering Heights takes place in a dark, tiny, parallel place, like one of those rolled-up dimensions string theorists like to talk about. Whether the supernatural exists there is uncertain. The law doesn't, except abstractly. It's a more violent world than ours. I felt like an outsider there - a feeling heightened by the book's storytelling framing device, which serves (as an epistolary does) to distance the reader from the action. I don't fully understand that world - but Emily does, and she adheres scrupulously to its weird rules. It's amazingly tightly plotted and conceived. And a total page-turner, which isn't unimportant. It's black, and melodramatic, and strange, and brilliant.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Wuthering Heights.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-9 of 9) (9 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Hesper You have almost convinced me to reread this. It's been a few years since I last gave it whirl anyway. The last paragraph of the review is spot-on.


message 2: by El (new) - rated it 2 stars

El You used the word "milquetoast" in a review - that's awesome!

You haven't changed my opinion of the book, but good review anyway.


Cindy OMG, string theory in a review about Wuthering Heights!!


Alex Yep, string theory and the word "milquetoast." I don't think it's overreaching to say that this is the best review ever.


Cindy I can confirm that string theorists are all milquetoasts. Or they like milky toast? I can't remember.


Brooke You said exactly what I feel about Cathy Jr!


Lila "This is a book that knows fiercely what it is."
Love that line.
I'm probably a little sick in the head but both times I read it, Heathcliff was the only person I liked and I despised everyone else.


Alex Thanks! And yes, I can confirm that you are a total sicko. This is why we can't have nice things.


Lila Hahaha!
"I'm a sicko and I know it..." (why do I even know the tune to that song?!what's happening to me!?)
Nice is relative and there are so many awesomely not nice things to be had.


back to top