Jessica's Reviews > Autumn

Autumn by David Moody

by
104004
's review
May 29, 07

bookshelves: read-in-2007
Read in January, 2007

“Billions died in less than 24 hours.”

Most zombie stories begin the same way. Take a random, ordinary day; add a mysterious plague that kills a great percentage of the population; focus on a handful of survivors as they seek each other out and come to terms with the fact that their loved ones are now flesh-eating undead. I really don’t see the need for re-writing the classic Night of the Living Dead gig, unless there’s a new (or at least interesting) twist to it. Like 28 Days Later, where the never-identified-as-zombies “Infected” have a very different sort of affliction, and even Shaun of the Dead with its comic twist. Autumn, sadly, offers nothing new or exciting in its story.

True to the genre formula, the book begins with an ordinary autumn day turned gruesome, as people begin to asphyxiate and literally drop dead, leaving very few survivors. By the end of the next day, half of the bodies “wake up” and start walking around aimlessly. And then they start reacting to sound and light… And then they start attacking the living... Not really all that suspenseful if you’ve ever seen a zombie flick.

But that’s ok, that’s what makes it a horror story. Author David Moody (if he - a horror writer - was actually born with that last name, it would be a crazy coincidence) still has a chance to wow me with his writing skills and characterization. We can look into the human condition; we can sympathize with the characters and bite our nails when it looks like they have no way out. We can be mentally transported to the cottage in which the survivors huddle and feel part of the story. At the very least, since it is a horror story after all, we can be supremely grossed out.

Or not.

Moody’s writing is disappointingly amateurish and repetitive (if I read the phrase “unexpected and inexplicable” one more time, I would have slammed my head into a wall). His descriptions are flat and the characters are mind-numbingly dull. We skim the surface of them – age, sex, occupation – but never delve into what they are feeling. Their interactions mainly consist of: “What should we do?” “I don’t know,” and, “Are you ok?” “Yes, are you ok?” I think the zombies could have had more interesting conversation!

The overall lack of suspense made the entire story seem anticlimactic. Nothing, truly nothing, happens. Even the undead are boring. They don’t eat a single brain in the entire book. Everyone knows zombies eat brains! I believe the closest we get is reading how one man is “swallowed up by the crowd” or something similarly un-detailed and not-interesting. Yawn.

Maybe the story gains momentum in one of the four sequels Moody penned for Autumn, but I’ll never know, because I won’t be reading them.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Autumn.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-6 of 6) (6 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Sara Shrewsbury This book is pretty far from a re-write of Night of the Living Dead.

Even though you state that the “infected” people in 28 Days Later are never referred to as the living dead I’m a little put off that you put it in the mix as zombie flick. That movie is much more comparable to hemorrhagic fevers in real life with a touch of anger driven cannibalism.

Zombies don’t eat only brains, not even in Night of the Living Dead.

Please recommend some good zombie books if this is considered on the low end of your list. It would be nice to argue with someone else about zombies.



Steven Your complaint about his name is as absurd as saying Stephen King is probably a pen name as he wanted to become a figurative "king of authors" or saying my name is fake because I like horror.

It has a fairly slow start, it is true, however I think that's one of the things that sets these zombies apart. Initially they seem safe. That's fairly atypical for a zombie story.

Also, I don't know how many zombie movies you've seen, but very few go strictly after brains. Most go the "all flesh must be eaten" route.


Mike I didn't bother writing a review myself since you nailed this one.

This book wasn't bad, it just wasn't much of anything.

Zombies eat brains, people. It's just a fact of life.


Jessica Si wrote: "THanks for the spoiler warning, you fool - now i guess i dont need to finish the book"

Well, there's nothing to "spoil" because nothing happens!


message 5: by [deleted user] (new)

Jessica wrote: "Si wrote: "THanks for the spoiler warning, you fool - now i guess i dont need to finish the book"

Well, there's nothing to "spoil" because nothing happens!"


which is a spoiler in itself


Alfred This book had a slow start, but it dealt more with the people and their state of minds rather than what was happening with the zombies. Hopefully the next book shares the zombie experience.


back to top