Chris's Reviews > The Diamond Age
The Diamond Age
by Neal Stephenson
by Neal Stephenson
I get the feeling that Stephenson's writing process goes something like this:
Hey, I found a really cool idea here. I wonder what I can do about it....
He then writes about 200 pages of really awesome, meticulous world-building, with innovative ideas about, in the case of this book, the possibly uses of nanotechnology and its eventual social ramifications, and then goes, Oh, damn, I'm writing a story, and high-tails it to the end of the book, leaving the reader a little wind-blown and confused. It happened in Snow Crash, where he was playing with the origins of language and the fundamental functioning of the human mind. It happened in Cryptonomicon, where he dove into the murky waters of cryptography and brought up brilliant gems, and it happened here, too.
The Diamond Age is, fundamentally, about what would happen, or what might happen, if we really got nanotechnology working properly. How would society adapt if, suddenly, government became obsolete? With the Feed and the Matter Compilers able to create anything out of nothing, the entire economic and political underpinnings of the planet came undone, and people banded together into phyles. Like-minded individuals bonded with each other through shared values and morality, united only by a commonly upheld treaty which, in turn, rested on the new economy that nanotechnology allowed.
Within one of the phyles, the Neo-Victorians, one of the more highly-placed Lords realized what was wrong with the world. The problem wasn't the corruption of values of which the old always accuse the young - indeed it was that those values were passed on too well. Children did not elect to join their phyles, they were indoctrinated into them from birth, which made them, well, boring.
And so Lord Finkle-McGraw commissioned a great work - The Young Lady's Illustrated Primer to guide his granddaughter to a more interesting life. And had that been all that happened, the story would have been short. But two other copes of the Primer were made - one for the daughter of the book's designer, and another that fell into the hands of Nell, a young girl born into poverty and otherwise destined to lead a life of misery and sorrow.
The Primer is a smart book, fully interactive, able to teach reading, science, history and martial arts, among other things. And what it teaches little Nell is how to be great.
All of this is quite awesome - there's a great hunt for the Primer, plans within plans and all that. And then, suddenly, a new plot about a technology to supplant the Feed and some kind of Chinese revolution and the whole book runs off the rails.
I know a lot of people love Neal Stephenson, and I can understand why. He's an incomparably imaginative man, who is able to find ways to express ideas that some of us couldn't even imagine. He's an heir to the world of that William Gibson and his contemporaries pioneered. He creates captivating worlds and characters and problems without simple solutions.
He just keeps bollixing up the endings. Seriously, it's like a whole different story kicks in around page 250. I'm willing to read more of his works, though, in the hope that he's getting his act together....
Hey, I found a really cool idea here. I wonder what I can do about it....
He then writes about 200 pages of really awesome, meticulous world-building, with innovative ideas about, in the case of this book, the possibly uses of nanotechnology and its eventual social ramifications, and then goes, Oh, damn, I'm writing a story, and high-tails it to the end of the book, leaving the reader a little wind-blown and confused. It happened in Snow Crash, where he was playing with the origins of language and the fundamental functioning of the human mind. It happened in Cryptonomicon, where he dove into the murky waters of cryptography and brought up brilliant gems, and it happened here, too.
The Diamond Age is, fundamentally, about what would happen, or what might happen, if we really got nanotechnology working properly. How would society adapt if, suddenly, government became obsolete? With the Feed and the Matter Compilers able to create anything out of nothing, the entire economic and political underpinnings of the planet came undone, and people banded together into phyles. Like-minded individuals bonded with each other through shared values and morality, united only by a commonly upheld treaty which, in turn, rested on the new economy that nanotechnology allowed.
Within one of the phyles, the Neo-Victorians, one of the more highly-placed Lords realized what was wrong with the world. The problem wasn't the corruption of values of which the old always accuse the young - indeed it was that those values were passed on too well. Children did not elect to join their phyles, they were indoctrinated into them from birth, which made them, well, boring.
And so Lord Finkle-McGraw commissioned a great work - The Young Lady's Illustrated Primer to guide his granddaughter to a more interesting life. And had that been all that happened, the story would have been short. But two other copes of the Primer were made - one for the daughter of the book's designer, and another that fell into the hands of Nell, a young girl born into poverty and otherwise destined to lead a life of misery and sorrow.
The Primer is a smart book, fully interactive, able to teach reading, science, history and martial arts, among other things. And what it teaches little Nell is how to be great.
All of this is quite awesome - there's a great hunt for the Primer, plans within plans and all that. And then, suddenly, a new plot about a technology to supplant the Feed and some kind of Chinese revolution and the whole book runs off the rails.
I know a lot of people love Neal Stephenson, and I can understand why. He's an incomparably imaginative man, who is able to find ways to express ideas that some of us couldn't even imagine. He's an heir to the world of that William Gibson and his contemporaries pioneered. He creates captivating worlds and characters and problems without simple solutions.
He just keeps bollixing up the endings. Seriously, it's like a whole different story kicks in around page 250. I'm willing to read more of his works, though, in the hope that he's getting his act together....
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Diamond Age.
sign in »
Comments (showing 1-13 of 13) (13 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Dani
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Dec 06, 2008 08:49am
I just read this book, but I understood it better after reading your summary. I also agree with you that the plot seemed to change around page 250. The bit about the revolution and the Seed totally turned me off. I was more interested in what Nell was going to do with her life.
reply
|
flag
*
Ratings are always strange. I finished the first half of Diamond Age thinking five stars and lowered to four after the ending. I think you must have read the first half thinking four and ending up three.
Ryan wrote: "Ratings are always strange. I finished the first half of Diamond Age thinking five stars and lowered to four after the ending. I think you must have read the first half thinking four and ending up ..."That sound about right. The unfortunate thing is that I started off at four, hoping for five.
I couldn't agree with you more about the endings of his books. I've read only 2 so far - the Diamond Age and Cryptonomicon. The ending of the former is a total mystery to me. I have really no idea what was happening all the time and I didn't really have the patience or motivation to figure it out. I felt like Stephenson was running up against a publishing deadline and was throwing out some half baked ideas that he hadn't thought out or taken the care to introduce properly. A real shame because the rest of the book was so interesting and coherent.As I mentioned, I had the same problem with Cryptonomicon although on a smaller scale.
In truth this has deterred me from reading more of his books. They are quite an investment of time. I hate to read 800 pages just to have the ending of the book make no sense and seem rushed.
I have to say that this book has a more satisfying ending than Snow Crash, but still seemed somewhat dependent upon a deus ex machina. Basically everything related to the Drummers in this novel I was annoyed by.
Hi Richard. I'm a big Stephenson fan, and I too wished the whole Drummers episode had not been included. It felt gratuitous, as did the made-up island scene in Cryptonomicon. And I agree, the endings are not quite as well integrated into the whole as I might wish. Even so, no one stimulates my imagination and gets me thinking philosophically about it all in such an entertaining way as Stephenson. So I completely forgive him his faults.
This is my favorite Sci-fi novel. I love the world building so much. I recently listen to the audiobook again. I actually found the point the book lost the plot when when Nell found a new home. After that, there is almost no point to the story. The whole drummer/seed thing can be airdropped from any other random novel and it could have made equal amount of sense. And I fell the "action sequences" are there in the end because Stephenson felt there need to be some explosions to make the last chapter feel more like an ending, which is not. It just ends.
Your review perfectly captured my sense of disappointment as well. This was my first read of Stephenson - and I intend to come back for Anathem - but I was really surprised by the second half of the book. It felt like a shift to bare plot without the insights of earlier chapters. My biggest problem was, as some others seem to feel, that the Seed and the Fists weren't developed enough to justify so much focus at the end. An interesting novel, but one that feels very much like a rushed work and missed opportunity.
Agreed with your review 100%. I really wanted to give this book four stars (and five at times), but the last third really blew it for me. Everything after the Drummers made little sense. I remember feeling similarly about Snow Crash. Stephenson is an over-rated writer, evidently.
i thought exactly the same. i was amazed with the ideas of the first half of the book (i would give even 5 stars). but the ending was just, i don't know, boring (maybe) for me. it was boring to read about this whole revolution and such (only 2 stars for it).
Oh, thank God. It wasn't just me. I was starting to feel like a sci-fi failure for really, really not liking this book, but you hit the nail right on the head. He tried to put too many stories in there, and it sort of bogged down.

