Jason's Reviews > Catch-22
Catch-22
by Joseph Heller
by Joseph Heller
Catch-22 reminds me a lot of those comedy/tragedy masks—you know the ones that are supposed to represent like, fine theater or something? Not that I’m comparing Catch-22 to some great Italian opera. All I’m saying is that the book oscillates cleverly between the absurdly humorous and the grievingly tragic.
So it starts off on the hilarious side. Here’s a bit that had me giggling aloud (rather embarrassingly, I might add, as I was surrounded by other people at the time):
And then, like great Italian opera (really, I hadn’t meant to expound the parallel this far, but look—its happening!), you start itching for the intermission because your legs are falling asleep and you really need to take a leak. This is the point at which the humor starts to wear thin and seemingly unrelated events are haphazardly thrown around and you’re wondering if it’s going anywhere or if it’s just one absurd situation after another.
But finally, you settle in for Act III and discover that the seemingly unrelated events are actually part of an ingenious narrative structure that Heller has planned out from the beginning. Jokes that were set up earlier finally deliver their punch lines. Only it turns out the jokes aren’t funny anymore. In many ways, Heller’s writing is like that of Kurt Vonnegut, with similar subject matter wrapped up in threads of absurdity. But while Vonnegut speaks of the horrors of war, Heller’s issues are more with the horrors of the War Department: it is the red tape of bureaucracy that gets his goat. Well, and war, too, but mostly it’s the bureaucracy.
Anyway, this book is smart and well written. It would be difficult for me to come up with the name of another author who could write such perfectly contradictory sentences while still making so much sense.
So it starts off on the hilarious side. Here’s a bit that had me giggling aloud (rather embarrassingly, I might add, as I was surrounded by other people at the time):
The colonel dwelt in a vortex of specialists who were still specializing in trying to determine what was troubling him. They hurled lights in his eyes to see if he could see, rammed needles into nerves to hear if he could feel.Ha! That one still gets me. Unfortunately, the laugh-out-loudness has caused some people to think I’m crazy, but I suppose that’s the price one must pay for decent literature.
And then, like great Italian opera (really, I hadn’t meant to expound the parallel this far, but look—its happening!), you start itching for the intermission because your legs are falling asleep and you really need to take a leak. This is the point at which the humor starts to wear thin and seemingly unrelated events are haphazardly thrown around and you’re wondering if it’s going anywhere or if it’s just one absurd situation after another.
But finally, you settle in for Act III and discover that the seemingly unrelated events are actually part of an ingenious narrative structure that Heller has planned out from the beginning. Jokes that were set up earlier finally deliver their punch lines. Only it turns out the jokes aren’t funny anymore. In many ways, Heller’s writing is like that of Kurt Vonnegut, with similar subject matter wrapped up in threads of absurdity. But while Vonnegut speaks of the horrors of war, Heller’s issues are more with the horrors of the War Department: it is the red tape of bureaucracy that gets his goat. Well, and war, too, but mostly it’s the bureaucracy.
Anyway, this book is smart and well written. It would be difficult for me to come up with the name of another author who could write such perfectly contradictory sentences while still making so much sense.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Catch-22.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 03/24/2012 |
|
10.0% | "Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn't, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to he was sane and had to." 1 comment | |
| 03/29/2012 |
|
40.0% | "Even among men lacking all distinction he inevitably stood out as a man lacking more distinction than all the rest, and people who met him were always impressed by how unimpressive he was." |
Comments (showing 1-8 of 8) (8 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Jason
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Apr 12, 2012 06:51am
I think I can understand people getting frustrated once the novelty of the "illogical situation" humor wears off, but it's definitely worth sticking with. Thanks, Brian!
reply
|
flag
*
Thanks, Brian. I'll check it out. For such a big Heller fan, I'm surprised you haven't read more Vonnegut. This one is my personal favorite. (Although Manny says it's because I haven't read Cat's Cradle yet.)
Bird Brian wrote: "Since you liked this, it occurs to me that you might also like Something Happened. I thought it was even better than Catch-22, in that the main character had a little more depth to him. It seems li..."Funny thing, I don't believe I've read anything, but Catch-22 so I think I'll take you up on the suggestion of reading Something Happened. Thanks BB.
I just finished this book last week, and I was amazed at the similarities of military absurdity and corporate absurdity. It's identical in many ways, especially stupid rules and regulations set up for no other reason than to justify someone's position. I wasn't sure how much I liked it, but ended up loving it.
Grand review. It has just occured to me that I don't remember this book at all and should reread it soon.
Thanks, Steve. Somehow I missed the notification for this, but I saw the comment in my feed instead.
I wonder if that isn't the hallmark of great satire - the thing that is seriously funny until you realize that ohmygod it totally isn't. I think I read this back when I was young and stupid as the apple blossoms, and it should probably be reread by me. Thanks for the review!

