Riku Sayuj's Reviews > The Unbearable Lightness of Being

The Unbearable Lightness of Being by Milan Kundera

by
1651956
's review
Feb 15, 13

bookshelves: reviews, favorites
Recommended to Riku by: Abid Hassan
Read from October 15 to 18, 2011 — I own a copy, read count: 2

The Unbelievable Lightness of The Novel

I had started reading this in 2008 and had gotten along quite a bit before I stopped reading the book for some reason and then it was forgotten. Recently, I saw the book in a bookstore and realized that I hadn't finished it. I picked it up and started it all over again since I was not entirely sure where I had left off last time. I was sure however that I had not read more than, say, 30 pages or so.

I definitely could not remember reading it for a long period of time. I only remembered starting it and bits and pieces about infidelities and the russian occupation of the Czech. And so, I started reading it, sure that soon a page will come from where the story will be fresh and unread.

I was soon into the fiftieth page and was amazed that as I read each page, I could distinctly remember every scene, every philosophical argument, even the exact quotes and the sequence of events that was to come immediately after the scene I was reading- But I could never remember, try as I might, what was coming two pages further into the novel.

"This is what comes from reading serious books lightly and not giving them the attention they deserve," I chastised myself, angry at the thought that my habit of reading multiple books in parallel must have been the cause of this. I must, at the risk of appearing boastful, say that the reason this bothered so much was that I always used to take pride in being able to remember the books that I read almost verbatim and this experience of reading a book that I had read before with this sense of knowing and forgetting at the same time, the two sensations running circles around each other and teasing me was completely disorienting. I felt like I was on some surreal world where all that is to come was already known to me but was still being revealed one step out of tune with my time.

In any case, this continued, to my bewilderment well into the two hundredth page. Even now, I could not shake the constant expectation that the story was going to go into unread new territories just 2 or 3 pages ahead of where I was. Every line I read I could remember having read before and in spite of making this mistake through so many pages, I still could not but tell myself that this time, surely, I have reached the part where I must have last closed the book three years ago.

Thus I have now reached the last few pages of the book and am still trying to come to terms with what it was about this novel that made me forget it, even though I identified with the views of the author and was never bored with the plot. Was this an intentional effect or just an aberration? Will I have the same feeling if I picked up the book again a few years from today?

I also feel a slight anger towards the author for playing this trick on me, for leading me on into reading the entire book again, without giving me anything new which I had not received from the book on my first reading. Usually when I decide to read a book again, I do it with the knowledge that I will gain something new with this reading, but Kundera gave me none of that.

What I do appreciate about this reading experience is this: as is stated in the novel, anything that happens only once might as well have not happened at all - does it then apply that any novel that can be read only once, might as well have not been read at all?

To conclude, I will recount an argument from the book that in retrospect helps me explain the experience:
Kundera talks (yes, the book is full of Kundera ripping apart the 'Fourth Wall' and talking to the reader, to the characters and even to himself) about an anecdote on how Beethoven came to compose one of his best quartets due to inspiration from a silly joke he had shared with a friend.

So Beethoven turned a frivolous inspiration into a serious quartet, a joke into metaphysical truth. Yet oddly enough, the transformation fails to surprise us. We would have been shocked, on the other hand, if Beethoven had transformed the seriousness of his quartet into the trifling joke. First (as an unfinished sketch) would have come the great metaphysical truth and last (as a finished masterpiece)—the most frivolous of jokes!

I would like to think that Kundera achieved this reverse proposition with this novel and that explains how I felt about it. And, yes I finished reading the second last line of the book with the full awareness of what the last line of the novel was going to be.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Unbearable Lightness of Being.
sign in »

Reading Progress

10/18/2011
100.0% "I so hated the editions of this book with those variations with the Bowler Hat on the cover - as if that motif captured the spirit of the book. I much prefer this particular cover, with the half finished sketch of a dog. This, with its reference to the incompleteness and to Karenin much better captures the central theme in my opinion."

Comments (showing 1-30 of 30) (30 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Tanuj Solanki This is the most literary review I've ever read. It's as if you've written and ode to the essence of the novel. Can I use parts of this review in a short story?


Riku Sayuj Sure dude. Would be honored. :)


message 3: by Rohini (new) - added it

Rohini Nair I cant help but agree with Tanuj..Is it a review or a short story by itself? Beautifully written!


message 4: by Tanu (new) - added it

Tanu Rohini wrote: "I cant help but agree with Tanuj..Is it a review or a short story by itself? Beautifully written!"

Ditto. Amazing review!


Riku Sayuj Tanu wrote: "Rohini wrote: "I cant help but agree with Tanuj..Is it a review or a short story by itself? Beautifully written!"

Ditto. Amazing review!"


Thanks Tanu! :)


message 6: by s.penkevich (new) - added it

s.penkevich Awesome review! I need to read this, I have to stop putting it off.


Riku Sayuj s.penkevich wrote: "Awesome review! I need to read this, I have to stop putting it off."

Thanks! So many books put off all the time... when will it end?


message 8: by Nilesh (new)

Nilesh Kashyap told in every comment yet I tell it again- beautiful and amazing review


Riku Sayuj Nilesh wrote: "told in every comment yet I tell it again- beautiful and amazing review"

Thank you so much, Nilesh! :)


William I like this review, Riku. I like it very much.


Steve Another top-notch review, Riku. You're good at these.

Have you seen the movie version of this? It's very good too, I thought, starring Daniel Day Lewis and Juliette Binoche.


message 12: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj Steve wrote: "Another top-notch review, Riku. You're good at these.

Have you seen the movie version of this? It's very good too, I thought, starring Daniel Day Lewis and Juliette Binoche."


I am having vertigo imagining how they made a movie of this...


message 13: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj William wrote: "I like this review, Riku. I like it very much."

:) dramatic


René I had to google the "Fourth Wall" and it turns out it was first used in literature in a critique of "Bored of the Rings", which as it turns out I have read and actually remember the sentence "it was going to be a long epic", though I couldn't have remembered it without reading it again, so I am presently right in the same sensation that you had in your re-reading, Riku!


message 15: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj René wrote: "I had to google the "Fourth Wall" and it turns out it was first used in literature in a critique of "Bored of the Rings", which as it turns out I have read and actually remember the sentence "it wa..."

Well in all its technicality, my usage of the term for Kundera might not be entirely appropriate... but since it sounds good, i will let it stand.

I am glad that you reminisced on lampoon due to me. Hope that compensates.


René Actually, I was trying to thank you for adding the "Fourth Wall" to my literary vocabulary and assorted toolkit :)


message 17: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj René wrote: "Actually, I was trying to thank you for adding the "Fourth Wall" to my literary vocabulary and assorted toolkit :)"

In that case, you are welcome. Let us hit the Fifth wall next?


René Goodness, no - that would be the floor!


message 19: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj René wrote: "Goodness, no - that would be the floor!"

I guess google didn't play a part in that answer :) or maybe you are one step ahead...


message 20: by Ian (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ian Graye Beautiful. But what does this mad myth signify?


message 21: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj Ian wrote: "Beautiful. But what does this mad myth signify?"

Which mad myth sir? of eternal return or of eternal rerun?


message 22: by Ian (last edited Jul 17, 2012 12:38am) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ian Graye "Did you ever wake up to find,
A day that broke up your mind,
Destroyed your notion of circular time?
It's just that demon life has got you in its sway."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ8Bc6...


message 23: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj Ian wrote: ""Did you ever wake up to find,
A day that broke up your mind,
Destroyed your notion of circular time?
It's just that demon life has got you in its sway."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ8Bc6..."



How do you have a song for every occasion...


message 24: by Bill (new)

Bill Researchers point to the fact that recognition memory is very good while recall is not so good


message 25: by Rubén (new)

Rubén Sánchez zazueta I've started reading this book, your comments turned on my interest of finish reading it.


message 26: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj Bill wrote: "Researchers point to the fact that recognition memory is very good while recall is not so good"

Well, that explains it! ...?


message 27: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj Rubén wrote: "I've started reading this book, your comments turned on my interest of finish reading it."

Did you??


message 28: by Rahul (new) - added it

Rahul Raina What a fantastic review. A review not for a particular novel, but for all the novels that are intended to be re read. And as far as this review goes, this too needs to be re visited time and again for the very same reason.
Thank you, Riku.


message 29: by Riku (new) - rated it 5 stars

Riku Sayuj Rahul wrote: "What a fantastic review. A review not for a particular novel, but for all the novels that are intended to be re read. And as far as this review goes, this too needs to be re visited time and again ..."

Why, thank you Rahul, for your interpretation. I had not thought of it like that!


message 30: by Alan (new)

Alan Interesting review, thanks. I can't read Kundera, who begins this one in a sophomoric, essayistic reflection--worse than Walden. (S'pose I'm spoiled by Austen and Dickens and Twain and Tolstoy and Goncharov and James and J K Toole and...) And I don't like any of his characters that I've met so far--admittedly, a scant acquaintance.
Maybe all the quasi-philosophical, essayistic works better in Czech, which may, like Italian, look up to the French, even the French Old Hat existentialism--that I wanted to study in the 60's, but was redirected to phenomenology since existentialism was passe.


back to top