Joel's Reviews > Rampant

Rampant by Diana Peterfreund

by
2863914
's review
May 10, 11

bookshelves: to-not-read-ever, ya, vote-getters
Recommended to Joel by: certainly not the art department
Recommended for: generic teen girls

This book is about giant killer unicorns. GIANT KILLER UNICORNS!

So why does it have a generic picture of a teen girl on the cover? Is it really and truly the case that today's generic teen girl will only read a book with a generic teen girl on the front, because that is how she identifies that it is indeed a book for generic teen girls to read?

Because if I was a generic teen girl and I wanted to read a book about GIANT KILLER UNICORNS, I wouldn't look for the one with me on the cover. I would look for this:



Or this:



Or this!



This is probably why I am not a generic teen girl.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Rampant.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-50 of 51) (51 new)


message 1: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya If you (not you personally, just you, a teen girl) were a generic teen girl, why would you want to read about giant killer unicorns? It's hardly a generic teen subject. The idea behind the cover is probably to fool generic teen girls into thinking this is a generic teen book about shining white horned (possibly horny, if the title is anything to go by!)horses that cuddle with virgin maidens. I think. I haven't read this book, so I'm only speculating...


message 2: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel Vinaya wrote: "If you (not you personally, just you, a teen girl) were a generic teen girl, why would you want to read about giant killer unicorns?"

because they are awesome.

presumably this is a truth universal.


message 3: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya If they are so awesome, why is this on your never-to-read-ever bookshelf?


Jillian -always aspiring- Vinaya wrote: "If you (not you personally, just you, a teen girl) were a generic teen girl, why would you want to read about giant killer unicorns? It's hardly a generic teen subject. The idea behind the cover is..."

Actually, the novel is about girls who train to HUNT AND KILL giant killer unicorns. ;)


message 5: by Joel (last edited Feb 09, 2011 10:08am) (new) - added it

Joel Vinaya wrote: "If they are so awesome, why is this on your never-to-read-ever bookshelf?"

Because it has a generic teen girl on the cover and, according to the laws of major publishing house marketing, is thus not for me.


message 6: by Vinaya (new)

Vinaya Lol, are they generic teen girls, as Joel seems to suspect, having, I think, totally judged the book by its cover?


message 7: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel Jillian -always aspiring- wrote: "Actually, the novel is about girls who train to HUNT AND KILL giant killer unicorns."

then the cover should be a generic teen girl holding aloft the severed head of a giant killer unicorn. some of the blood should be dripping onto her, but she doesn't care, because she is a warrior triumphant.


message 8: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel Vinaya wrote: "Lol, are they generic teen girls, as Joel seems to suspect, having, I think, totally judged the book by its cover?"

you seem to have grasped the point of this "review."


message 9: by Flannery (last edited Feb 01, 2011 01:06pm) (new)

Flannery

I agree, something more like this would be appropriate.


message 10: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel MS Paint ftw!


message 11: by Vinaya (last edited Feb 01, 2011 11:46am) (new)

Vinaya Lol, Flannery, I don't know what your current profession is, but whatever it is, QUIT IT right now! And go join Simon & Schuster or Hyperion or some other publishers of generic teen books. God knows they could use the fresh blood (pun intended)!


message 12: by EZRead (new)

EZRead eBookstore This books sounds out. of. control.


message 13: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel yes, while i will probably never read it, it doesn't really belong on the "will never read" shelf because i would totally be willing to read it.


message 14: by Carol (new)

Carol Oates I think this is possibly the best review EVER! lol


message 15: by Mariel (new)

Mariel At least there is a sword!


message 16: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel yes but the unicorn reflected in the blade scarcely looks evil at all. where is the blood? the gore? the impaling?




message 17: by Jasmine (new)

Jasmine Joel wrote: "yes but the unicorn reflected in the blade scarcely looks evil at all. where is the blood? the gore? the impaling?

"


I just sent that picture to my brother's girlfriend. thank you.


message 18: by Mariel (new)

Mariel Maybe these are sissy unicorns. She is probably the bad kid in Toy Story.


message 19: by Aloha (new) - added it

Aloha Joel, I'm lured here not because of the book, but because of the pictures. I'm a sucker for good pictures! Cheap trick, but it works on me. Killer unicorns. Hmmmm Normally, I can't stand YA unless it's sophisticated YA, like Pullman's His Dark Materials series, especially if the YA features a picture of a girl on the cover, like it's for tweens. Very bad choice of cover art.


message 20: by Reese (new)

Reese I love the review, but I "gotta" say that I looked closely at the face on the cover (to enable me to decide whether or not this book is for me), and now I'm less concerned about the hooks that businesses use to grab customers and more concerned about this representation of a "generic teen girl." Does the "generic teen girl" see herself (or her inner self) in the face on that cover? I really hope not. Does the "seriously disturbed generic teen girl" (oxymoron or redundancy???) identify with the girl on the cover? Oh well, at least the cover that sucks inspired a very entertaining review of "something."


message 21: by Jasmine (last edited Feb 02, 2011 03:58pm) (new)

Jasmine Reese wrote: "I love the review, but I "gotta" say that I looked closely at the face on the cover (to enable me to decide whether or not this book is for me), and now I'm less concerned about the hooks that busi..."

she looks generic to me.


message 22: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel book cover generic maybe. if you saw someone in real life that had been that heavily photoshopped, you'd probably want to get her to a doctor.


message 23: by Kwesi 章英狮 (new)

Kwesi 章英狮 Liked you review, funny killer unicorns! GO TO HELL! BWahaha!


message 24: by Joel (last edited Feb 09, 2011 10:41am) (new) - added it

Joel this review is now famous: http://www.dianapeterfreund.com/two-s...

thanks for the assist, flannery.


message 25: by Robert (new)

Robert I'd never read this book because I can't figure out how blood can ever "ooze freely". (See above link.)

Thanks for the laughs. All the pics would make better covers!


message 26: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel all my image links were dead! fixed!


message 27: by Miriam (new)

Miriam


message 28: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel ew. hahaha.


message 29: by Michele (new) - added it

Michele Best. Review. Ever.


Libby dont be ridicuous. You are judging a book by its cover...literally!


message 31: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel


message 32: by MoonButterfly (new)

MoonButterfly This has to be one of the funniest reviews ever. hehe.


Libby Joel wrote: ""

Sure it is.


message 34: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel well i'm glad you get it. your posts otherwise suggest you are pretty humorless.


Libby Joel wrote: "well i'm glad you get it. your posts otherwise suggest you are pretty humorless."

Lol you obviously know nothing about me. Hahahaha humorless. That's a good one.


message 36: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel i know! that's why i'm so glad you clarified that you understood that i wasn't actually judging this book, but literally only judging its cover.


Libby Yeaah. But you really should read the book, I'm reading it now and it isn't bad.


message 38: by Robert (new)

Robert Hold on - the quote is "ooze freely" - how can a book with such an oxymoron in it be good?


message 39: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel robert, you are repeating yourself! (see your comment from february.)


message 40: by Robert (new)

Robert Yes - but I was emphasising the point to the person suggesting it was "not bad"...unless by "not bad" she meant, "terrible."


message 41: by Joel (new) - added it

Joel oh, i see. point taken.


message 42: by David (new)

David This thread has taken an odd turn.

It should be hastily abandoned like a dead hooker under a viaduct.


message 43: by Robert (new)

Robert You're right, it's not my place to say that by "not bad" you meant "terrible" so it's a good thing I didn't do so!


message 44: by Miriam (new)

Miriam It should be hastily abandoned like a dead hooker under a viaduct.

Birthday party get out of control, David?


Amarise (Bridget) You've made a great point. Why isn't there a picture of an evil Unicorn on there? Or at least one that LOOKS innocent, until you take a closer look and see a fang hanging out! lol...But maybe, just maybe {pulling at straws here} that the publishers didn't want to scare the kids that would pass by the book? Hey..I'm pulling at straws here! lol


message 46: by Stephanie (new) - added it

Stephanie Your, and everyone else's comments really makes me want to read this. I survived the 50 Shades trilogy so I think I can make it through this book.

When I say survived, I mean it almost sucked the will to read ever again out of me.


message 47: by Joel (last edited Feb 01, 2013 07:43am) (new) - added it

Joel Stephanie wrote: "Your, and everyone else's comments really makes me want to read this. I survived the 50 Shades trilogy so I think I can make it through this book."

there is probably no man-on-unicorn BDSM in this.

probably.


message 48: by Stephanie (new) - added it

Stephanie Ooo now that would be a good book. Think of all the things that horn could be used for.


message 49: by Miriam (new)

Miriam Stephanie wrote: "Ooo now that would be a good book. Think of all the things that horn could be used for."

Everything's been done already.

Unicorn's Reluctant Mate


message 50: by Stephanie (new) - added it

Stephanie Woah! I am certainly behind the times. I need to get hip to the uniporn.


« previous 1
back to top