Ceridwen's Reviews > Married With Zombies

Married With Zombies by Jesse Petersen

by
1055856
's review
Dec 12, 10

bookshelves: america-and-environs, for-teh-ladies, omg-were-all-going-to-die, pulp, rbrs, sexy-nihilists, zombies
Recommended to Ceridwen by: Meredith & Eh! are awesome
Recommended for: Plane readers
Read in October, 2010

This poor book. If I had written and posted my review when I read the book, it would have been full of a bunch of !!!! and SQUEE. I had very low expectations going in, and read it on a plane, where I have a much lower standard for enjoyment. A short list of things in favor of this book:

1. For dropping the f-bomb on the second page, and for general cussedness throughout the book. Marriage, and the zombie apocalypse, are not times to mince words.

2. For killing a zombie with a toilet seat. I find the whole toilet-seat-up-or-down debate that goes on lame beyond the telling of it, mostly because I think everyone should completely close the throne when not in use. It has a lid for a reason; use it.

3. For having no descriptions of sex of any kind, especially not corpsesecks. Every.single.person I told about this book before I read it asked me if it had zombiesecks in it, and then gave me a look like I was gross for reading it. I am not gross! Nor is this book in that way.

But, hrm, I was coming at this novel as a romance novel, where my standards are super low because it's entirely not the genre for me, and I know that. Married With Zombies is a whole lot less romance novel, and a lot more romantic zombedy, and it's in the mash-up where I think this book both succeeds and fails. So, our main characters start the story bickering on the way to their marriage counseling session, and it's some good bicker. They find their marriage counselor eating the corpses of the previous couple and that's maybe the best thing ever. From here they bop around trying to survive the zombie apocalypse, and I truly, earnestly believe the take-home message is that any marriage can be worked out if the couple can kill every last ever-loving person they know. I don't want to get too *spoiler alert*, but seriously, if you are with a couple like this in the zombie apocalypse, start looking for an exit strategy, because you are next. Om nom nom, bitches.

Sorry I'm about to get all weird and serious, but I think there is something perfect about putting together a zombie narrative and the romance novel, because both are narratives of narcissism. (When I say perfect, I'm being a little bitchy.) Much as I love me some zombies, I'm also bothered by how often these stories hinge on narrative exceptionalism, where the main characters survive and thrive only because they are main characters, and author-proxies, and reader-proxies. Not good enough, if you want to be a human being. I've taken the facebook quiz about whether I'd survive the zombie apocalypse, and I did fine because I answered assuming I'd throw everyone under the bus. I wouldn't though; that's just wrong. The same thing could be said of romance novels, in terms of narcissism. If you take a step back from the swooning and sparkling, so often the main characters of TEH ROMANCE are creepy sociopaths, who stand up to the impediments to their union using self-involvement. Here it's kind of perfect: love is just another word for no one left to kill. I've always though that romantic love is terrifically anti-social: love doesn't give a good godamn about race or creed or gender or whatnot, but romance novels seek to contain that fucked up crazy force, and siphon it into marriage and bab*es and happily ever after after. The HEA is a cabin filled with supplies and a gun that doesn't jam.

So, that's where this book fails for me, ultimately. If you take it lightly, it's mostly fun, but the minute you stop and think, you realize that the main characters are incredibly poorly sketched – like, I have no idea what this couples' genuine problems were, and they got over them through murder and driving around a lot. Okay. The zombies are a little nonsensical – they have a period of lucidity right after they turn that's poorly played, and a contrivance for a scene that should have been cut. But it's bothersome, very bothersome, to me to have to care about people who have not proven to me I should care. Zombie narratives often pull the “omg, but maybe the living are the monsters” card, which I often sigh about, but it's not such a bad message, really. The central couple here is monstrous in a way, blundering through this story with their protagonist invincibility, dispatching their marital problems and everyone in their paths with a lack of affect I find troubling. You know the whole funny ha-ha idea? This book goes for scary ha-ha, and hits ha-ha scary, and not in the way it intents. Shoot, now I've bummed myself out.

Really, though, it's worthwhile as a plane read, and fine if you give it no thought. In fact, I blame Goodreads for making me think about this stuff long enough to write a review, and myself for waiting a month to write this. I'm still on the fence about rating this, but I'll probably go for three, just because of certain zombie sock monsters who were with me for my read.

zombiesock


Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Married With Zombies.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-24 of 24) (24 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

Sparrow Yes. This was a difficult one to rate. I went for total inflation because I liked her character more as a person than the chick in Soulless, who didn't really make sense if we're being totally honest. And with Skye inflation, I don't think this would be proper at a two. With PtP and Fulk? That would be sad.


Ceridwen Yeah, it's Skye in the works again for me. I almost gave it a two, but it really isn't as bad as PtP and Fulk - I did honestly enjoy reading it, but I couldn't recommend it to anyone at this point, which makes it a two, in my book.

I liked her character more as a person than the chick in Soulless, who didn't really make sense if we're being totally honest.

No, Alexia really doesn't. We're given all of this information about her, and then much of it is violated, like the stupid fashion thing. This chick doesn't have much of a character - she's a series of quips. In the right situation, I like quips, but...


Eh?Eh! SOM should be set aside as an outlier. It's completely wrecking your rating systems.


message 4: by Mariel (new)

Mariel I heart the zombie sock monster. I'd foot the bill for that if not the book.


Ceridwen Eh?Eh! wrote: "SOM should be set aside as an outlier. It's completely wrecking your rating systems."

Meh, I like leaving Skye in a one-star time-out chair. I think maybe my ratings for this genre are more accurate with SOM in a weird way - these books are not going to be for me, and they start at a disadvantage. SOM gives them a head start. Plus, I reserve the right to be entirely arbitrary in my ratings.


message 6: by Elizabeth (new)

Elizabeth I don't think you were being bitchy enough; Skye is definitely skewing your ratings. :-)


message 7: by Brainycat (new)

Brainycat "...love is just another word for no one left to kill."

That's the most romantic thing I've read in months.


message 8: by Ceridwen (last edited Dec 13, 2010 03:42pm) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Ceridwen Oh, she totally is. I read that other zombie thing I won in a fit of insomnia, and rating that is really bothersome. So much better written than this - so much - but some major fails in the middle of the book. This didn't fail so much as not try. What to do?

Edit: I didn't win in a fit of insomnia - I read it.


Ceridwen Brainycat wrote: ""...love is just another word for no one left to kill."

That's the most romantic thing I've read in months."


♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥


Sparrow Ceridwen wrote: "Meh, I like leaving Skye in a one-star time-out chair. I think maybe my ratings for this genre are more accurate with SOM in a weird way - these books are not going to be for me, and they start at a disadvantage. SOM gives them a head start. Plus, I reserve the right to be entirely arbitrary in my ratings."

I agree with this. I still kept some books at one star, but it really puts things in perspective more than throwing them off. I also agree with what Caris said on his Fulk thread about needing to really hate a book for it to be a one-starer.


Sparrow Ceridwen wrote: "No, Alexia really doesn't. We're given all of this information about her, and then much of it is violated, like the stupid fashion thing. This chick doesn't have much of a character - she's a series of quips. In the right situation, I like quips, but..."

This is a good point. But, she does love Joss. I feel like maybe she does have character, but no development, where maybe Alexia has development. Plus, as you say, she does kill her neighbor with a toilet seat. If that's not character, then I don't know what is.


message 12: by Greg (new)

Greg Ahh!! The Zombie is wearing a pin with a Union Square Squirrel on it!!!


karen hahahah i know!! but why isn't he strapped in???


message 14: by Greg (new)

Greg zombies don't need to wear seatbelts.


karen that's how they get loose!


Ceridwen karen wrote: "hahahah i know!! but why isn't he strapped in???"

I will not be surviving the zombie apocalypse. One of the rules is buckle up, I know.

Union Square Zombie Squirrels represent!


message 17: by Greg (new)

Greg That's what was missing from Monster Island, there could have been zombie squirrels in the Union Square scene to go along with the pigeons.


message 18: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Hahahahahhaaa!!


message 19: by Kat Kennedy (new)

Kat Kennedy I thought this was a very well thought-out and interesting review! I'll probably read this book because I love zombie fiction but you've given me a lot to think about. As sad as it is to say, the only thing that would make my marriage more wonderful WOULD be a zombie apocalypse. Mr Kat loves hitting things with bats and baby Kat thinks it's very funny.


Ceridwen Ha! There's a lot about this book that is fun and enjoyable, and I would love to hear what you think about the ending. I couldn't get into it in my review, because I'm allergic to the spoiler box, but that's where my real trouble was. I will just say I understand troubles with in-laws, but...


message 21: by Jay (new) - rated it 2 stars

Jay You're completely right. I managed to think my way from enjoying this to becoming utterly annoyed by the characters in the space of 5 pages and now I'm so aggravated that I no longer want to read anymore. If a book makes me say "you people are assholes" more than twice, I stop reading.


Ceridwen Yeah, this book definitely doesn't hold up to scrutiny well. I read it in a sitting, which may be the way to go. Better luck with your next read!


message 23: by Pam (new) - added it

Pam Godwin Freakin loved this review. Makes me want to read it, not want to read it, want to read it...oh hell, I'll TBR it and decide later.

Well put, Ceridwen!


Ceridwen I would never say don't read this - it's totally fine, worth a half-attentive read while you're on a plane or whatever. Just don't flinch and think about it too hard - it's fun that way.


back to top