Caitlin O'Sullivan's Reviews > Out of the Dark

Out of the Dark by David Weber

by
2695439
's review
Dec 06, 10

bookshelves: science_fiction
Read from December 05 to 06, 2010

Out of the Dark is . . . interesting. It's got a whopper of a twist ending that I'd maybe, possibly be on board for if this was the first book in a new series . . . or if the "twist" elements were introduced earlier. (Weber drops some hints--the title, as it happens, is a pretty big one--but the nature of "twist" doesn't become clear until the last pages of the book.)

It also suffers from a few too many viewpoints: the story follows four human protagonists (all male . . . little annoying from the guy who created Honor frickin' Harrington) as well as the alien commander of the invasion force. This split attention span results in some unusually wooden dialogue and undeveloped secondary characters--again, not something completely unusual in the annals of science fiction, but a little surprising from Weber.

All in all, I've got my fingers crossed that Weber writes a sequel, set either on post-invasion Earth or on the way to delivering the royal a$$-kicking the Hegemony deserves for picking on humans. This particular set of ideas has possibilities, and I'd be eager to see Weber set some of the inadequacies of Out of the Dark right with another book.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Out of the Dark.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-2 of 2) (2 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Chip (new) - rated it 1 star

Chip "I've got my fingers crossed that Weber writes a sequel ..."

What?! Sequel? No! NO! DEAR GOD NO MORE!!!


Caitlin O'Sullivan LOL, didn't dig the book, Chip? Unfortunately, he is . . . I talked to an admin on his website who was super nice while I was still ticked about the book, and she said he originally thought it'd be a standalone, but he's going to do a sequel.

What did you dislike about OotD? Share your pain.


back to top