Saya's Reviews > New Moon

New Moon by Stephenie Meyer

by
Nophoto-u-50x66
's review
Jan 23, 08

Recommended for: The fans and romance obssessed teen girls
Read in October, 2006

** spoiler alert ** Not as good as Twilight having chosen to abandon EVERY element that made it so great but still manages to keep this book afloat with the new mystery and dangers.

Edward leaving wasn't surprising, he kept thinking about it before when Bella was in the hospital and it was a drama and angst inducing twist- it was bound to happen in due time. I just can't believe Bella's self esteem went from feeling occasional envy and remorse due to Edward's perfection to not considering herself worthy of him and constantly reminding herself how unworthy she is- she couldn't consider him lying to her at all! Hey, Meyer, where did the observant, sarcastic Bella go that we grew to know and love? Because this spineless, pathetic shell can't be true- I thought Bella was smarter than that. I actually googled "psychotic" and found "psychotic depression", the symptoms being: suicidal thoughts (Ed's voice itself could qualify), suicide attempts (all of her attempts to hear Ed's voice), audio and or visual hallucination (Ed's voice again and her vision of him before passing out in the ocean), not feeling as you once did when well (hole in chest), aggression (well, she couldn't bring herself to be mad at Edward, even if she forgave him and understood his actions, her subconscious should still be mad), frustration (perhaps her visits to the Cullen home and meadow), and feelings of hopelessness (the entire book, from being upset to aging at the beginning to her woes of the Volturi and Jake at the end). Great, we got ourselves a crazy person (no offense to those actually afflicted with this). Sheesh Bella, get back your old spine then fix it so you can stop embarrassing teenage girls. At least Bella is now certain that Edward loves her.

I know many fans were upset at Edward's scarce appearances and even more upset and even mad with Jake taking his place. Now, I like Jake, he's fun, sweet, loyal, has a temper, fixes automobiles- wait, that's- that's a personality I spy. Whodathunkit. Besides Alice and Carlisle, none of the other characters have displayed a prominent hobby that they do on a regular basis for fun rather than as part of the plot. Though not nearly as perfect as Edward, Jake offers a sorely needed element to Bella's tale: humanity. Jake is a human with all its flaws and gifts- he jokes, he mocks, he fixes motorcycles, he fears, and he loves. Of course is not only human. I just don't understand why he loves Bella, Meyer actually gives a brief second person POV to help us better understand Jake, the only thing it did was make me question his love for Bella even more. She offers him nothing besides a free motorcycle. Poor Jake, forced to love Bella for the sake of plot.

I suspected werewolves when Jake mentioned wolves being sacred to the Quileutes back in Twilight not too mention being Native American with the skin walker legend- it wasn't very surprising (that and I read werewolves in that copyright page). The werewolves added a very homey, nature sort of feel to the story which I enjoyed, I think I would like a tale of Native American werewolf teenage boys more than the Cullens. Though the fact that only boys are werewolves only added more fuel to my fire of "The Twilight Saga is Misogynistic". You can deny it all you like Stephenie Meyer but Alice nor Jane- only two pros- is enough to fight back the tides supporting this. If you're so "anti-human" then why are all the women so desperate, bitter, and clingy, huh?

The Volturi. Now this was cool. It made the dull middle all worth it here. Aro was fun (the only one to be), Jane was too happy-to-serve-and-hurt-people-while-creepily-smiling, you know, those little girls who won't stop creepily smiling, they annoy me. Sadly, the Volturi are basically, your typical baddies who dress in black, act intimidating, and set a time line to force someone's hand and create more drama and tension. Their role as secret keepers makes them unique but... Why must the vampires remain secret from humans? Unlike your typical vampire, Meyer's are not vulnerable to ANYTHING besides another vampire and werewolves and even then they can survive that unless all parts of the torn apart vampire are burned. Why hide? Bad Meyer, she made such an interesting group yet has no good reason for them to exist.

Victoria... geez, why does her desire to kill Bella for vengeance only strengthen my idea that the universe revolves around Bella? It can't be because the Cullens, James, the Volturi, Forks High, and the werewolves are all either out to get her, romantically pursue her, worship her, or protect her when she doesn't deserve it.

Meyer's writing is nothing special but it made Twilight magical and actually made my heart race in the meadow; it possessed a simple and descriptive prose that definitely helped me envision the setting. New Moon's was not as magical but it was still descriptive (certainly better than the robotic Eclipse). The pacing is also strange- Meyer merely wrote the months' names on the pages to show how detached Bella was from her "hopeless" life and then taking so long to tell us of her bonding with Jake. Interesting and effective but dull and slow nonetheless.

My biggest gripe with New Moon is how Bella never grew as a human. She spent all her time holding onto Edward- who DUMPED her- and then clinging to Jake as a life support, then of course abandoning Jake to save her love and then clinging to him even more desperately then Jake. I can pity her but only when Edward (and the other Cullens) return does Bella return to normal. It was pathetic and sickening. Damn it Bella, you're a human girl, ACT LIKE ONE! Another grip is how New Moon turned into a love triangle (or will turn since that action takes place in the sequel). Meyer has stated that Twilight was meant to be a stand alone novel and it certainly shows. We came for Bella and Edward and now we have this love triangle which I cannot understand. Bella becomes absolutely pathetic and whiny, Jake's love goes unexplained and serves as nothing more than like Paris in Romeo & Juliet, and Edward is seen so seldom it threw the story off balance. The werewolves provided a nature, family, real horror feel, so I enjoyed the book more than an average Edward fan. But trust me reader, it only gets worse! Prepare yourself for Eclipse which spends the majority of its incredible length too strengthening Bella and Jake and leaving Bella and Edward in the "Too Be Developed if Ever" category. Just stop here for nothing more than a supremely lame love triangle of inexplicable absurdities awaits you- and bad writing.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read New Moon.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-31 of 31) (31 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Violet (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:34am) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Violet Yeah, i was really disappointed in this book as well. I still can't believe that she jumped off a cliff to try to hear Edward's voice . . . sorry, but I think she DEFINITELY went crazy or something. All of the sudden, instead of being low-maintenance, sarcastic, new-girl-at-school Bella, she is life-dependent on Edward and Edward is life-dependent (ish) on her. How did this happen? I mean, Edward loves her because of her scent and the mystery that he can't read her mind. Bella loves him because he is unbelievably beautiful for a human . . . initially . . . and i got so FED UP with Bella for a while that basically i was reading New Moon just for the sake of getting to some kind of relief to get Bella off the floor and to Italy. Bella kinda lost ALL of the qualities I admired her for and Jacob just sucked it up. Ugh. I think Twilight was WAAAYYYY better.


Ashley I don't get what you 2 are complaining about! I read BOTH of your complaints! It's ridiculas! Bella is AWESOME!!! She is a teenage girl that has CHANGED thanks to Edward! Besides, she's not JUST in love with Edward's beauty, she's in love with his soul, actions, everything about him! How could you say that he was just in love with her because of her scent and mysterey of the "not being able to read her mind"! He HATED her in the beginning of Twilight because of that! And Bella IS life-dependant on him because he's cahnged her so much! I guess you've NEVER had someone THAT special in YOUR life! No one to make you crazy! Wait! If your mom or dad died, and you could do CRAZY things to hear their voice, would you do it?! That's how it is to Bella! Do you get it?!


Denys L.H. Ashley, you do not know a good read if it bit you on your fangirl ass. Just stop it before you humiliate yourself even more. Saya has a point.


message 4: by Mariah (last edited Jun 26, 2008 10:04am) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Mariah ashley is right,bella rox! and it was edward's fault for leaving her!


Lily At first, Bella's crazy over-reaction was getting on my nerves, too. Then I just thought, "Her boyfriend's a vampire. I've never dated a vampire, so I don't know what it's like." Then I also remembered that a sane, calm little Bella who could deal with Edward being gone would not provide all the fun and juicy drama I require. Yes, her character makes absolutely no sense. But once I decided to just empathize with her and not stress about it, I got really into the book.


message 6: by Sabinaj (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:52am) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Sabinaj New moon was okay and the first part of her and Edward watching Romeo and Juliet (him being Romeo, of course *eye roll*) having him so perfect it just aggravates me! Why can't Edward be less perfect, like jacob? THat's what makes Jacob so cool, he has a personality.

Ye, Edward has no personality anymore.
All he does is "hunger" (literally and figuretivally) for Bella.
Nice in the first book. NOt so much the second and third.


message 7: by Jenn (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn Saya you are absolutely right anyone who hasn't been blinded by the excitement that is the twilight series will know that these books are not that good and poorly written in addition to being a spineless suspenseless boring book. The whole book does revolve around bella even though it shouldn't. I do not understand why all the excitment surrounding these books they are not anything special and why stephenie meyer is being crowned queen of fiction is completely lost on me. Personally Anne rice is alot better than the twilight series,


Ashley So untrue! The reason that the book is revolved around Bella is because it's all ABOUT Bella! Everywhere the book is, Bella is!


message 9: by Jenn (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn personally theres a difference, a character being in a situation is diffrent. what i meant was that everyone seems to have an unrealistic interest in protecting her like shes a god and everyone seems to be in love with her and im sorry but this is very far fetched.


Ashley Well Bella is different from every other human so they like her plus Edward is in love with her so his family wants to keep him happy. We don't exactly know what a vampire's feelings are so we can't judge them as far-fetched. They like Bella for who she is. What books did Anne Rice write?


message 11: by Jenn (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:52am) (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn well from what i 've read vampires are pretty detached and many authors like stephenie meyer included have given us a small window of insight into a vampire's mind, and as far as i know stephenie meyer or any other author for that matter has never met a vampire so how would they know either? it's all about how you read books honestly.
anyhow let me make this distinction i love twilight it was a good book Bella in twilight was a much stronger character but in new moon and especially eclipse she's incredibly pathetic, in new moon fine yes she's mourning ok but there are better ways to deal with it and moping and waiting for a guy to come home is a pretty sad excuse for mourning. personally she should have mourned by living not by staying silent and dying.
and the entire point of my arguement is that bella is alot like every other human particularly every other human and that she's not very special and she's become the mixture of "girl next door" and " clingy girlfriend"

and warning label on the anne rice books; they're not like twilight. they're interesting books but they can get quintin tarantino meets ed gein violent. they're graphic so if your not into that kind of thing i don't suggest it. but if you are the titles are
queen of the damned, Lestat, interview with the vampire, memnoch the devil, etc etc you can find them on amazon and she has a wikipedia article so you can look at them there.


message 12: by Ashley (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:52am) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ashley Well vampires are NOT real so the author makes them up & this is how she made these vampires! New Moon is NOT pathetic! If you don't like this love story then that's up to you but this is kinda like most love stories now days. Thing is we don't have vampires running around & all of the action! But still, people are like that to each other! Bella & Edward were OBSESSED in each other! They had to be seperated & it was to much for Bella who couldn't bear it! It was a LOT for Edward too but he has lived so long he thought he could take it. He did until he guessed that Bella was dead. Then he couldn't take it! We need to understand that we've never had that much love & we don't really understand it! She is CRAZY obsessed in him!


message 13: by Jenn (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn that's how you read into it. I'm critiquing Bella's lack of strength and will to live. i dont know about you but i think that if i lost everything I could still live on. I have my idea of vampires and they tend to be detached as edward said in twilight that bella was resurrecting all that was human in him. so you can imagine that for a while there he was not very humanic not very emotional so therefore he was detached.
But even when some people lose their true love they still live on even though the person they were obsessed with has died or moved on what ever the case may be but they still had the guts and the strength to live which is what im criticizing bella for. personally the girl she was in twilight could have taken that punch and that's why i am so disappointed in these books. the narrator who i used to admire has turned into a disgrace.
and yes you are right most romance stories out there have a can't live without youheartbreaking love. but those narrators have a way tougher skin and i can admire that.


Ashley You don't understand how much in love Bella & Edward were INTO each other! It was like Romeo & Juliet! Have u seen that play? They loved each other so much that they died for each other! it might've been a sad ending but guess what? They LOVED each other too much! Bella did SO many crazy things becuase she could then HEAR Edward! She still had her love inside of her! It's not crazy! It's love! Love is called crazy. love is love and so many ppl want it. Imagine two ppl who have NEVER been in love with anyone ever & now they r in love. They r going to be CRAZY over each other! If someone saved ur life & then left & u loved this person more than anything in the world, what would u do. You've saved him & he's saved u! You'd die if u could save his life! Don't u think that you'd be doing anything to hear his voice!


message 15: by Jenn (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn to me true love one of the most powerful forces in the entire world is the ability to live without the other half but not wanting to. having the ability to live without this person but desperately not wanting to fathom living without that other person so much it makes your heart explode. Bella did not live while edward was absent this to me is a pathetic petty shallow infatuation not real love. in addition bella to me has proven to be a weak character (for example) bending to edwards will completely not having much of a backbone when it comes to him not really noting his personality only his physical beauty not really being that intelligent etc... it really annoys me when she re uses the same phrases over again to describe him, every other page. the language is incredibly boring. that is not the mark of a good writer or a good book.



Rachel Read the book a 2nd time.
Since you know what happens, you won't be rushing through it and be so mad that Edward is gone.
Learn to fully appreciate Stephenie's stand point.
Yes it was bound to happen, so why are you complaining?

I totally understand Edward's view too.
He's so overprotective, but he loves her so much, that he can't put her in danger.
If the love of your exisistance was in danger of dying everyday (literaly), could you bear it?
Could you stay by their side so selfishly?
This proves that Edward isn't so selfish, and he actually cares about Bella's well being.
Although he clearly underestimates the amount of love coming from Bella and ends up regretting it, we would not have had a wonderful character development with Jacob. (although I completely loathed him at first, after reading a 2nd time through the sereies, I'm only slightly irritated by him)

You would understand if the love of your life left you.
It's obviously never happened to you, and all the moping Bella does is exactly what any regular woman or girl would do if the love of her life left her.




Ashley I completely agree with you Rachel! It's the point that I've been trying to get across! Bella DOES love Edward but she loves him so much that she can't overcome her feelings for him! She weeps & gets mad & does everything that a regular "Completely In Love" girl would do!


Rachel Exactly.
That's why Edward never expected the reaction she had when he left.
He expected her to completely forget about him, but Bella truly was in love with him.
He never realized that, so when he found what a wreck she was, he realized that he could never do it to her again.
I doubt he could do it to himself again either.


message 19: by Jenn (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn thats your opinion mine is different. and fyi i did read the book a couple of times but the more i thought about it the more i really didnt like it. i got tired of her purple prose , and im sorry but any in love girl is not suicidal sure depressed i get crying i get, but mopey and a self described zombie not thats not in love thats just pathetic. and the fact that edward didnt know that she would act this way that just says that he doesnt know her well enough.


Rachel Answer me, have you ever had the love your life walk away from her?

A lot of people are suicidal after break ups, and mopey, and zombie like. I know from first hand expierence.

Edward clearly underestimates how much she loves him because he can't read her mind. He thought she was just having natural teenage infatuation, which is normal for a teenager, and that's all he's seen during his exisistence. He never ever expected a teenager to fall in love. Of course Edward doesn't know Bella well enough. That's why he leaves her.


message 21: by Jenn (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn firstly i'm sorry for what happened to you. i have had someone that i honestly thought was the love of my life walk away from me. yes i was depressed in my own little hole that took a long time to get out of, but even at rock bottom i never lost the need to survive, the need to keep living life, i have too much pride and im too ruled by my head and logic to let myself die. and my hole did not hurt other people. bella was never able to let go and i think she's weak for it. I won't lie it took me a while to let go but once i did i found that those wounds healed. i would have been like bella i could have been like her but i wasn't.

so getting out of my own hole and living to tell the tale allows me to criticize bella. and i hate the cliche of teenage girls falling in tini bopper love and never being able to get over it and bella represents this and i hate that, in addition to other things.


Ashley Jenn, was the your FIRST boyfriend ever? Have u had someone that wasn't the "love of ur life" walk away from u? Remember, this is Bella's FISRT boyfrined ever and he is PERFECT!!! Did u KNOW if ur "love of ur life" REALLY loved u? Bella knew that Edward REALLY loved her and would even DIE for her as we saw in the very first book! U didn't have ur love risk their life for u so this love story is a little bit different!


message 23: by Jenn (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn no he wasn't. and yes i know at some point he did but we grew apart i was in it and he wasn't but the point is that i cared about him alot. and yes i have been dumped and dumped other people i have all kinds of experience in that area. and for you to just assume that it wasn't 'die for you' kind of love then you're wrong and its pretty ignorant of you to make those assumptions not to mention rude and insensitive. and btw if bella honestly believed that edward loved her she wouldn't have become so weak and pathetic in the first place and would have just waited for him to come home. also edward is less than perfect...


Ashley Bella thought that Edward loved her but when he left she wasn't so sure! And accutally I'm not ignorant, rude, and insensitive. It's just the TRUTH! I know Edward is less than perfect but he's closer than us humans are! Like me & u! Even Jacob said that Edward was perfect! I NEVER said that ur boyfriend wouldn't die for u! U read that WRONG! I said that Bella KNEW that Edward would die for her because it said so in the first book! Ok? You make me upset when u don't read what i said correctly! And no, Bella would NOT have waited for Edward to come home! Edward wants Bella to be safe and Bella knows that he thinks that he's a DANGER to her! She still KNOWS that he loves her!


message 25: by Jenn (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:52am) (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn personally the way i read into it bella would have just waited because she would have had no idea where he'd gone and well, no way of getting him to comeback. she would have known that he would have had to come back and therefore would not have lost her mind
[Edward wants Bella to be safe and Bella knows that he thinks that he's a DANGER to her! She still KNOWS that he loves her!:] at the end of the book she did but during it she didn't conciously know it, hence the-bella-i-hate's debut.

i know this is a new moon review but what did you think of the bella in breaking dawn trait-wise? personally bella was a thousand times better in breaking dawn than here, and eclipse she wasn't so needy or whiny.

im sorry but edward isn't close to perfect, he's a little boring and kind of one sided but not so much here but in eclipse its very predominant

and you're right i read it wrong my apologies, i jumped.



message 26: by Ashley (last edited Aug 07, 2008 09:09am) (new) - rated it 5 stars

Ashley Well in a way she felt rejected and now that i think about it, Edward made a speech to Bella that made it sound as if he DIDN'T love her so she might've believed him! Still, perfect does NOT mean that u need to be happy all the time and do what everyone wants u to do! That's not perfect. It's Bella's TRUE love, and her FIRST boyfriend, and the FIRST time anyone has saved her life because of love (and has done it twice!), and the most BEAUTIFUL guy she's ever seen, and it's probolly her very FIRST real kiss! This guy was everything to her! Then he left her so that was a REALLY big thing for Bella! It BROKE her so she couldn't do anything! She was beyond love with Edward, that's all i can say! Love is an amzing thing! Love can change a person forever, in good and bad ways! Love is something indescribable! Love has changed Bella and when Edward left, love changed Bella even more because her love had left her!


Heidi I think your comment is 100% right on. I was disgusted as well by Bella's psychotic change. I was like, get OVER it! He LEFT! I would NEVER have forgiven him so quickly. Also I commented this elsewhere, but the entire relationship between Bella and Edward is on HIS terms alone. When they can kiss, how much they can kiss, what they can and can't do. He dictates it ALL! So what if he is a vampire. that is a controlling relationship and she is completely at the mercy of him and his "control". She can't even function when he leaves. I was disgusted by this and as a result haven't read book 3 or 4 yet. Perhaps I will though, just to see what happens. Also she will become a vampire at the drop of a hat, nevermind never seeing her parents again. They don't matter at all. It's all HER and EDWARD. Sad. It's sadder that some of the other commenters think that this is real love.


message 28: by Jenn (new) - rated it 1 star

Jenn I agree with you heidi and that's what I have been trying to say. btw ashley no such thing as perfect in love. and the key word that you used and i used is obssessed. obssesed is not love its just obsessed


message 29: by Funky (last edited Feb 25, 2009 02:52am) (new) - rated it 2 stars

Funky I personally thought New Moon was the worst book in the series. Jacob can go jump down a freakin hole for all I care.

But I disagree with many of you.

To Violet,
*spoiler*
Their both life-dependant on eachother, and they both went crazy. Yes Edward did go crazy just as much as Bella. He cracked and was coming to get her back, but then Bella jumped off that freakin cliff.

I think it's beautiful, that they love eachother so much, that they cant live without eachother.Thats how important they are to one another. But I understand your point of veiw completely.

To Ashley,
I agree with you ash, but you dont have to be so fed up about it. Ihese are just other peoples opinions.

to Rachel,

Edward leaves only because he loves her. He realized that hes been putting her life in danger and wanted her to have better

to Jenn,
*spoiler*

In breaking Dawn Bella seems stronger, less dependant. But thats only becasue she turned int oa vampire and her confidence grew. I eclipse(my fave) she seemed less whiny.





Funky To heidi,

I dont agree. This proves how much Bella loves Edward, and how much Edward loves Bella. They simply cant live without eachother. Bella only forgave him because she knew he was only trying to protect her.and becasue she LOVES him too much.

and *spoiler*

In three and four, she DOESNT want to leave her mom and dad. She cares about her whole family and how they would feel about her changing.


Odette First off, Saya, props to you for writing this review. I agree with basically everything you've said.

I wasn't going to jump in here, but Ashley, I'd just like to point out that in Romeo and Juliet, they are not in love. They are in lust. Shakespeare wrote the play as what not to do.


back to top