<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<review id="13094598">
    <user id="65647">
    <name><![CDATA[Julie]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Charlotte, NC]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/65647-julie]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>11</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="teaching" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Mar 04 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jan 21 16:13:58 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Oct 12 13:03:34 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I think I'm missing something.  Everyone <em>loves</em> this book and I liked it too, but it wasn't <em>amazing</em> or anything.<br/><br/><u>The Giver</u> felt like a very sparse story to me.  First, there isn't much characterization, so I didn't form an emotional connection with any of the characters -- not even with Jonas or the Giver (two central characters).  Asher and Fiona (particularly Fiona) are introduced such that you assume they will play greater roles in the book than they do.  I don't feel like I knew Mom or Dad or Lily at all.  While the lack of an emotional bond with these lesser characters may be due to the nature of their community, Jonas and the Giver should really be more sympathetic, in my opinion.<br/><br/>Second, the description of the community itself is sparse.  There is so much more that could've been described about this &quot;utopian&quot; community. I feel like Jonas' selection, his revelation about Release, and his eventual choice could've been built up and framed better. I feel like I got the quick campfire version.<br/><br/>Finally, while I appreciate it's overall message about the importance of individual differences, human emotion, etc., I felt like the book was a bit heavy-handed with its moral.  Jonas' initial support of his community and gradual change of heart seems intended to present both viewpoints, but doesn't succeed in my opinion.  The book's agenda was clear to me from the beginning.  It also doesn't present alternative possibilities (such as a world without Sameness but also without war, a world without Release but also without starvation, etc.) -- the choice is either here (with Sameness and no color) or Elsewhere (with pain and suffering).<br/><br/>When teaching the book, I also felt it was very important for students to understand how this heavy-handed moral (that most of us would agree with somewhat) demonstrates Lowry's (and our own) privilege. That is, the reason it's easy for us to say that Jonas' community is horrible is because of our own relatively privileged lives.  If we lived in Darfur, were extremely impoverished, lived in a country where women were treated as property, etc., we may make a very different choice about Jonas' life.<br/><br/>Despite all of this, believe it or not, I <em>did</em> like <u>The Giver</u>.  It's an enjoyable read.  It had a great plot, the community was interesting, and the ending was fantastic and JUST a little ambiguous -- cool! ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/13094598]]></url>
</review>

</GoodreadsResponse>