Ben Wood's Reviews > Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling
Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling
by John Taylor Gatto
by John Taylor Gatto
A great antidote and partial explanation into the world of schooling in the US and elsewhere. I felt there was sometimes too much ranting without any admission of the positive role schooling can and does play for children. It feels that the author is to the point of merely demonizing the entire establishment b/c that is easier than dealing with the nuances of reality.
Additionally, the book is very poorly edited. For instance, on pages 52-53, we see different versions of the same paragraph (begins with "We used to make steel, now we make bubbles...") that seems to me like a gross oversight. There are other instances of poor readability and editing, such as referring back to themes that haven't yet been introduced--what? And as one who is so critical of lazy thinking and poor schooling, shouldn't the author be more rigorous in his own writing? Perhaps his excuse is that he too is a product of the monstrous school system? The book is not at all coherent, rather it is a collection of former speeches that have been lightly touched up but in no way corralled into a cognizant whole.
That said, the content and anecdotes are generally provocative and open up what I think on the whole is a positive inquiry into the purpose and efficacy of schools.
This book has encouraged me to read and re-read the classics and look into the lives of some other notable people: Ben Franklin's autobiography; David Farragut (America's first admiral, took command of a captured British ship at age 12); Shen Wenrong (See Financial Times, March 17, 2006) who led an army of Chinese peasants without computers or any other sophisticated planning to move an entire steel plant from Germany to near Shanghai in about half the time the German engineers had estimated it would take; the story of Sir Richard Branson being told by his mother to find his way home as a 4-year-old from a place miles from their home (see also New Yorker article in May 2007); Dr. Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time;
Contrasting schooling and education: "...Schooling is a matter of habit and attitude training. It takes place from the outside in. Education is a matter of self-mastery, first; then self-enlargement, even self-transcendence--as all possibilities of the human spirit open themselves into zones for exploration and understanding." (p. 61) "Education must be largely self-initiated, a tapestry woven out of broad experience, constant introspection, ability to concentrate on one's purpose in spite of distractions, a combination of curiosity, patience, and intense watchfulness, and it requires substantial trial and error risk-taking, along with a considerable ability to take feedback from the environment-to learn from mistakes." (p. 62)
My reading opened a strong debate with my wife about the merits of home-schooling, but in the end I agreed that this alternative also has its own glaring shortfalls: lack of specialized skills on the part of the parent to plan and execute curricula on a variety of subjects (or this would take a rather inordinate amount of time). Home-schooling is anecdotally related by my wife to social awkwardness and a bizarre sort of atrophy of the ability to deal with others. I have no scientific basis for this correlation, and am open to contrary evidence.
In the end my wife and I agreed that for all its faults, public/private schooling should be augmented by high expectations and extracurricular activities by us as parents to encourage education and learning as a pursuit worthy in-and-of itself and to encourage qualities and attributes that make for a principled, critically-thinking and moral human being.
Additionally, the book is very poorly edited. For instance, on pages 52-53, we see different versions of the same paragraph (begins with "We used to make steel, now we make bubbles...") that seems to me like a gross oversight. There are other instances of poor readability and editing, such as referring back to themes that haven't yet been introduced--what? And as one who is so critical of lazy thinking and poor schooling, shouldn't the author be more rigorous in his own writing? Perhaps his excuse is that he too is a product of the monstrous school system? The book is not at all coherent, rather it is a collection of former speeches that have been lightly touched up but in no way corralled into a cognizant whole.
That said, the content and anecdotes are generally provocative and open up what I think on the whole is a positive inquiry into the purpose and efficacy of schools.
This book has encouraged me to read and re-read the classics and look into the lives of some other notable people: Ben Franklin's autobiography; David Farragut (America's first admiral, took command of a captured British ship at age 12); Shen Wenrong (See Financial Times, March 17, 2006) who led an army of Chinese peasants without computers or any other sophisticated planning to move an entire steel plant from Germany to near Shanghai in about half the time the German engineers had estimated it would take; the story of Sir Richard Branson being told by his mother to find his way home as a 4-year-old from a place miles from their home (see also New Yorker article in May 2007); Dr. Carroll Quigley's Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time;
Contrasting schooling and education: "...Schooling is a matter of habit and attitude training. It takes place from the outside in. Education is a matter of self-mastery, first; then self-enlargement, even self-transcendence--as all possibilities of the human spirit open themselves into zones for exploration and understanding." (p. 61) "Education must be largely self-initiated, a tapestry woven out of broad experience, constant introspection, ability to concentrate on one's purpose in spite of distractions, a combination of curiosity, patience, and intense watchfulness, and it requires substantial trial and error risk-taking, along with a considerable ability to take feedback from the environment-to learn from mistakes." (p. 62)
My reading opened a strong debate with my wife about the merits of home-schooling, but in the end I agreed that this alternative also has its own glaring shortfalls: lack of specialized skills on the part of the parent to plan and execute curricula on a variety of subjects (or this would take a rather inordinate amount of time). Home-schooling is anecdotally related by my wife to social awkwardness and a bizarre sort of atrophy of the ability to deal with others. I have no scientific basis for this correlation, and am open to contrary evidence.
In the end my wife and I agreed that for all its faults, public/private schooling should be augmented by high expectations and extracurricular activities by us as parents to encourage education and learning as a pursuit worthy in-and-of itself and to encourage qualities and attributes that make for a principled, critically-thinking and moral human being.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Weapons of Mass Instruction.
sign in »


That being said, there are huge disadvantages in public school to kids that are above average. Teachers really have to focus on the lower third of the class to get them up to par for tests. Some of my kids' teachers have done a great job providing more advanced curriculum. For example, one teacher provided a more challenging spelling list each week for Lydia. But after volunteering in Ethan's classroom this year, I realized how hard it is to have a separate spelling test for the more advanced kids because she has to have a separate one for the kids that are behind. So basically Lydia and Ethan cruise through spelling without ever studying or being challenged.
Some advantages to home-school are that the kids have more time for specialties, like music. My most advanced student is home schooled and she won a competition this year on both piano and harp, and one of the reasons for that is that she has way more time to practice than anyone in public school. I have definitely seen plenty of families who do home-school right and their kids are not socially awkward thanks to church, sports, etc. But I have certainly seen the other end of the spectrum too.
If I had unlimited money I think I might choose Montessori school. I went to help one of my harp students for her music program at her Montessori school and I was so impressed. It was a completely different environment and philosophy than the public schools.