Anne Hawn Smith's Reviews > The Devil's Gentleman: Privilege, Poison, and the Trial That Ushered in the Twentieth Century

The Devil's Gentleman by Harold Schechter

by
2393446
's review
Nov 07, 10

bookshelves: history, mystery, non-fiction, true-crime
Read from October 18 to November 06, 2010

This was the story of Roland Molineaux, a poisoner from the turn of the 20th century. He was the son of a famous and beloved General of the Civil War. He was accused of poisoning a rival for his intended wife and a man from his health club whom he had taken a severe dislike to. While the case added up, the motive seemed extreme for a gentleman of his class. The story was very interesting, especially as it was something of a "bad seed" affair. This is also another "Lizzy Borden" case in which there was a great deal of controversy about the verdicts which have not been agreed upon to this day.

Along with this is the story of the tabloid press or "yellow journalism" engendered by Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst. Both men took over failing newspapers and turned them into wildly successful enterprises which left them multi-millionairs. What was especially interesting to me was the fact that the papers had detectives of their own and often managed to stay one step ahead of the police. This case changed journalism forever.

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Devil's Gentleman.
sign in »

Comments (showing 1-1 of 1) (1 new)

dateDown_arrow    newest »

message 1: by Valerie (new)

Valerie Arguably, not necessarily a desireable change. It's not just that Lizzie Borden's life (for one), was utterly ruined. She didn't have a very promising life to begin with--the sensationalist descriptions of her life would (unfortunately) have been typical of far too many people of her time.

It's also that, by picking 'crime' out of the matrix of social and material life at any time, there's a tendency to ignore how irrelevant 'crime' is to most people's lives--while really major problems (which aren't as easily dissected or 'solved') go uncovered.

It's this sort of highly biased reporting (where immense amounts of attention go to a mother and child injured on a road without sidewalks, but nobody examines why the mother had to be taking her son to child care at 5:00 am) that makes me repeatedly recommend the Morbidity And Mortality Weekly Report to reporters.

And the fact that 'failing' newspapers SUCCESSFULLY increased their circulation by this kind of sleight of hand would worry me a lot less...if it weren't still going on.


back to top