Tina's Reviews > The Lover's Dictionary
The Lover's Dictionary
by David Levithan (Goodreads Author)
by David Levithan (Goodreads Author)
Tina's review
bookshelves: 2011, best-2011, literary-fiction, romance, tfg-100, 2013
Feb 14, 13
bookshelves: 2011, best-2011, literary-fiction, romance, tfg-100, 2013
Read from June 20, 2011 to February 14, 2013
Original post at One More Page
When I first heard about David Levithan's latest book, The Lover's Dictionary, I wanted to read it only because of the clever idea behind the book. I love anything that involves wordplay. I loved the idea that this book is told using dictionary words, and for some reason, this gives me the feeling that this book has a universal feel to it, like anyone could relate to an entry here at one point. I ordered a copy off Book Depository a few weeks ago after I realized that it's cheaper there, and when it finally arrived, I actually dropped the books I was reading to devour this one.
The Lover's Dictionary is quite easy to devour given its short, dictionary-like format. This book, as mentioned in the blurb, tells the story of an unnamed couple, written using different words from a dictionary. The narrator, who is a guy based on the entries, is a writer while the girl seemed like a wild, whimsical character who seems to have enchanted our narrator. But as their relationship goes on, it gets harder for the both of them, and we readers are left wondering if the they decide to stay together or part.
The entries weren't written in chronological order so the timeline tends to jump from one anecdote to another, while others just seem like a sharing, or a comment on how the relationship is or how each has changed because of the relationship. It's equal parts sad and happy, a lot mushy and it tends to leave the readers pondering on what makes a relationship tick. There's something about finding common ground, which I really liked:
Or this, about being intimidated by one another:
I'm pretty sure the story the authors intended for the characters here is not the same for everyone, but I think everyone who's ever loved will find that they are able to relate to one or two or more entries in The Lover's Dictionary . This makes the book very rereadable, especially in random -- just pick it up, open to a page and read. This book also makes me wonder: if I were to make a dictionary of my own love life, what words would I use?
But alas, my own love life is still nonexistent. That fact made me a bit distant to the novel, because I can't relate. Not yet, anyway. However, The Lover's Dictionary affirms things that I know, based from stories, reading and yes, even experiences (the proper place to elaborate on this is on my personal blog :P): relationships are messy, it takes a lot of work and it would hurt both parties a lot...but allow me to believe that even so, relationships can be beautiful at the same time. :)
Whether you're a romantic or not, I recommend The Lover's Dictionary by David Levithan. I'm sure you'll find a bit of yourself in one of the entries in this dictionary.
When I first heard about David Levithan's latest book, The Lover's Dictionary, I wanted to read it only because of the clever idea behind the book. I love anything that involves wordplay. I loved the idea that this book is told using dictionary words, and for some reason, this gives me the feeling that this book has a universal feel to it, like anyone could relate to an entry here at one point. I ordered a copy off Book Depository a few weeks ago after I realized that it's cheaper there, and when it finally arrived, I actually dropped the books I was reading to devour this one.
The Lover's Dictionary is quite easy to devour given its short, dictionary-like format. This book, as mentioned in the blurb, tells the story of an unnamed couple, written using different words from a dictionary. The narrator, who is a guy based on the entries, is a writer while the girl seemed like a wild, whimsical character who seems to have enchanted our narrator. But as their relationship goes on, it gets harder for the both of them, and we readers are left wondering if the they decide to stay together or part.
The entries weren't written in chronological order so the timeline tends to jump from one anecdote to another, while others just seem like a sharing, or a comment on how the relationship is or how each has changed because of the relationship. It's equal parts sad and happy, a lot mushy and it tends to leave the readers pondering on what makes a relationship tick. There's something about finding common ground, which I really liked:
akin, adj.
I noticed on your profile that you said you said you loved Charlotte's Web. So it was something we talked about on that first date, about how much the world radiant sealed it for ach of us, and how the most heartbreaking moment isn't when Charlotte dies, but when it looks like all of her children will leave Wilbur, too.
In the long view, did it matter that we shared this? Did it matter that we both drank coffee at night and both happened to go to Barcelona the summer after our senior year? In the long view, was it such a revelation that we were both ticklish and that we both liked dogs more than cats? Really, weren't these facts just placeholders until the long view could truly assert itself?
We were paining by numbers, starting with the greens. Because that happened to be our favorite color. And this, we figured, had to mean something.
Or this, about being intimidated by one another:
daunting, adj.
Really, we should use this more as a verb. You daunted me, and I daunted you. Or would it be that I was daunted by you and you were daunted by me? That sounds better. it daunted me that you were so beautiful, that you were so ate ease in social situations, as if every room was heliotropic, with you at the center. And I guess it daunted you that I had so many more friends than you, that I could put words together like this, on paper, and could sometimes conjure a certain sense out of things.
The key is to never recognize these imbalances. To not let the dauntingness daunt us.
I'm pretty sure the story the authors intended for the characters here is not the same for everyone, but I think everyone who's ever loved will find that they are able to relate to one or two or more entries in The Lover's Dictionary . This makes the book very rereadable, especially in random -- just pick it up, open to a page and read. This book also makes me wonder: if I were to make a dictionary of my own love life, what words would I use?
But alas, my own love life is still nonexistent. That fact made me a bit distant to the novel, because I can't relate. Not yet, anyway. However, The Lover's Dictionary affirms things that I know, based from stories, reading and yes, even experiences (the proper place to elaborate on this is on my personal blog :P): relationships are messy, it takes a lot of work and it would hurt both parties a lot...but allow me to believe that even so, relationships can be beautiful at the same time. :)
Whether you're a romantic or not, I recommend The Lover's Dictionary by David Levithan. I'm sure you'll find a bit of yourself in one of the entries in this dictionary.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Lover's Dictionary.
sign in »
Reading Progress
| 06/22 | page 172 |
|
82.0% | |
| 06/22 | page 211 |
|
100.0% | "Sigh." |
| 02/13 | page 3 |
|
1.0% | "Rereading, just because it's Valentine's Day. :)" |
| 02/13 | page 13 |
|
6.0% | "There was a pause. I was still scared of every gap in our conversation, fearing that this was it, the point where we had nothing left to say. I was still trying to impress you, and I still wanted to be impressed by you, so I could pass along pieces of your impressiveness in stories to my friends, convincing myself that this was possible." |
| 02/13 | page 55 |
|
26.0% | "We do not divulge our histories chronologically. It's not like we can sit each other down and say "Tell me what happened," and then ride from that conversation knowing everything. Most of the time, we don't even realize that we're dividing ourselves into clues." |
| 02/13 | page 93 |
|
44.0% | "The speed does us in. We act rashly, we say too much, we don't let all the synapses connect before we do the thing we shouldn't do." |
| 02/13 | page 120 |
|
56.0% | "These words will ultimately end up being the barest of reflections, devoid of the sensations words cannot convey. Trying to write about love is ultimately like trying to have a dictionary represent life. No matter how many words there are, there will never be enough." |
| 02/14 | page 199 |
|
94.0% | "Then she sat me down and told me not to worry. She said moments like this were like waking up in the middle of the night: You're scared, you're disoriented, and you're completely convinced you're right. But then you stay awake a little longer and you realize things aren't as fearful as they seem." |
Comments (showing 1-11 of 11) (11 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Monique
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jun 26, 2011 05:41am
Did you say "wordplay"? I'm interested! :)
reply
|
flag
*
Yes, wordplay! :) I think Fully Booked has copies of this, but if you don't want to splurge (it's a bit expensive for a thin hardbound volume), I can lend my copy to you. :)
Haha, sa dami ng gusto ko nang hiramin sa yo, baka next meet-up, puro sa akin lang ang madala mo. :D
Monique: haha why not? That's what being in a book club (of sorts) means, right? Haha.Isamlq: Thanks!
KD: I don't think I'm ready for that yet. Haha. :p
Wendy: You're welcome! :)
Nice review, piqued my interest. Although reading the sample entries they look a LOT like the themed drabbles I read at Fanfiction.net sometimes O_O Is there a solid story behind the drabbles or is it just a collection of tangentially related stories?
Tintin wrote: "Is there a solid story behind the drabbles or is it just a collection of tangentially related stories? "Yes, there's a story. It follows the couple through different parts of their relationship. Sometimes the narrator is just musing, sometimes there are conversations, sometimes he's remembering the time she said "I love you" to him. It jumps from one point to another, but after a few entries, you'll be able to connect the dots. :)



